Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Ballistic gelatin test results : .30 Carbine

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Brass Fetcher, Mar 30, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    Firearm : US M-1 Carbine with 18" barrel length

    Ammunition : Federal 110gr Power-Shok SPRN and 110gr M1 ball

    Block calibration : 10.6cm @ 597 ft/sec

    Both shots fired from a distance of 10' between the muzzle face and the front face of the rifle-size gelatin block.

    Shot 1 - Federal 110gr Power-Shok Soft Point round nose. Impacted at 1954 ft/sec, penetrated to 16.3" and exited the rear face of the block. Bullet was recovered at unknown distance in a polyester bullet arresting box. Recovered average diameter was 0.461".

    Shot 2 - Lake City 1952, M1 ball. Impacted at 1910 ft/sec, penetrated to 16.3" and exited the rear face of the block. Bullet began to yaw at 4.0" penetration and righted itself (apparently continued on in nose-forward orientation) at 11.9". This action of the bullet created significant wounding potential, as may be evident in the second picture below. Bullet was not recovered.

    Please note that the damage to the upper portion of the block in the second photo happened sometime during removal from the mold. It was not an effect of a bullet penetration.

    Thank you.
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    So what does this two-shot test tell us?
     
  3. goon

    goon Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Messages:
    7,246
    Well it would appear to support the idea that a .30 Carbine will shoot right through me.

    ;)
     
  4. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    It appears as though this round does transfer energy fairly well to the block of gelatin.

    I'm sure this would make a great home defense rifle for women and children who cannot handle the recoil of a shotgun or handgun.

    STeve
     
  5. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I sort of thought that it was already well known that the M1 Carbine was good for close range self defense.
     
  6. dfaugh

    dfaugh Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,994
    Yes, but I would not have expected nearly that amount of penetration/damage.
     
  7. FMJMIKE

    FMJMIKE Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    1,577
    Location:
    Copper Hill, Virginia
    Very intersting..........thanks.......:D


    GunNut.....I guess I am a woman or child. I use a M1 Carbine for my Home defense weapon. I really wouldn't critize the weapon unless you have used one. I am very comfortable with it and what it will do if needed. Just think....All the guys in WWII that used them were women and children.
     
  8. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    Sounds like M1 Carbine is use-able by women and children, just like a Ruger 10-22 finds use with shooters of all ages and gender.

    I got to shoot the gun because the owner had to work when I could get to the range (the owner of the gun usually shoots it at the blocks)... so I got some FMJ ammo that he told me to 'use up'. I'd shot a Garand before but not the Carbine. What a nice gun! The recoil was between and AR15 and an AK47, not bad at all.

    RE the terminal effects - what I was looking for was: adequate penetration and then 'what did it do to the block'. In both respects, I am satisfied with its performance. Much better results should be possible with a bullet that goes ~ 12.0" and stops ... but that test will have to be sometime in the unforseeable future... :)
     
  9. Gordon

    Gordon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,110
    Location:
    central Kali.
    Thank you for the test!:)
    For a little field data on the Carbine: I've used it for 25 years to slaughter sheep, goats,steers and hogs that I couldn't catch for some reason. My experience has been the Remington softpoint is the best bullet for this job. I've used ball for a decade before the softpoints appeared. A goat or sheep with a classic behind the front shoulder thru the lungs and heart shot from less than 50 yards goes down in a heap 90% of the time with the Rem soft point. The same shot with ball they usually run 50 yards or so and pile up. The softpoints they are usually dead when you walk up , the ball loads they are normally still concious, either way the throat is cut. ;)
    Ball or soft point a brain shot is instantaneous on all the animals including horse, donkeys,cattle and the smaller stuff, only diffewrence being the ball always is a thru and thru penetrator where the softpoint SOMETIMES is not and the eyeballs are blown out a bit:barf:
     
  10. Sylvilagus Aquaticus

    Sylvilagus Aquaticus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,170
    Location:
    Dallas, Texas
    My Ruger Blackhawk in .30 Carbine does a fine job on hogs, close-up coyotes, and cinderblocks. With a 110 grain FNHP on top of a stout load of H110 or 4227 (especially H110) it knocks mosquitoes down with the muzzle blast.

    Regards,
    Rabbit.
     
  11. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    Wow. Count me surprised. That pup packs more of a punch than I would have expected. Esp. the FMJ! Now we just need a .45 ACP test out of a Thompson-length barrel and some of the old WWII arms debates might have to be revisited.
     
  12. DMK

    DMK Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,763
    Location:
    Over the hills and far, far away
    Hogwash. These are obviously fakes. Everyone knows that .30 carbine ball bounced off the coats that the Chicoms wore. :rolleyes:
     
  13. dispatch55126

    dispatch55126 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,228
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Nice work. Have you done a 7.62x54 yet?
     
  14. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    I heard that one too...

    Unfortunately, the local fabric store was out of 'Chi-Com winter jacket' fabric to face the block with :D .

    The gentleman who lent me the rifle said that a lot of the failures to stop were due to the non-corrosive priming compound of the ammo that I was shooting - he said that the chemicals in corrosive priming compounds lends itself better to the extreme cold?

    In any case... the idea behind this test was to evaluate the defensive capability of this gun, using quality soft points. The FMJs were just a baseline (and I know that people are interested in the performance of this particular round because of performance during Korea)... I wouldn't recommend FMJ for defense except under very limited circumstances.
     
  15. john paul

    john paul Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2006
    Messages:
    133
    Location:
    cleveland tx
    imho

    right after rita i found out that the m1 carbine fits perfectly in the folded up rear seat of a f250 extended cab and no one panics if they don't see it. better to have it and not need it...
     
  16. MD_Willington

    MD_Willington Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2005
    Messages:
    3,692
    Location:
    Canuck in SE WA State.
    All I know is I'd love to be able to get a CMP M1... but they'll probably be out of them by the time I get my US citizenship in 2010 :banghead:
     
  17. Sven

    Sven Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    3,808
    Location:
    Los Gatos, CA
    [​IMG]

    All I gotta say is M1 Carbines are MM mm good. :)
     
  18. 50 Shooter

    50 Shooter member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,499
    Location:
    SoCal PRK
    JE,
    Thanks for the pics and the thread, good stuff. Just got my copy of VHP and read the article on the .50 BMG gel test.
     
  19. SSN Vet

    SSN Vet Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2006
    Messages:
    5,757
    Location:
    The Dark Side of the Moon
    thanks for posting these excellent pics and doing the write up.
     
  20. GCW5

    GCW5 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2007
    Messages:
    224
    This is why I own M1 Carbines, not AR's. Plenty of penetration and a bigger hole. I wish someone would shoot some blocks with the 95gr XTP, I think it would work even better than the softpoints. I'm going to get some and try them in mine.
     
  21. Brass Fetcher

    Brass Fetcher Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2006
    Messages:
    1,685
    Location:
    Eastern border of the United States
    You're welcome. Thank you for posting.

    @50 Shooter - Thank you - I just read the article myself... I'm published!!! But my last name is misspelled - it's Ervin, not Irwin. :(

    I thought about sizing down the heavier 0.312" XTP bullets - problem is, I don't have the dies to reload the ammo. Tomorrow I will ask the owner of the gun to see if he has the dies - if he will let me borrow the gun again, expect a lot more M1 carbine tests.

    The gun is outstanding for several reasons - the short distance between the top of the front sight and the centerline of the muzzle (mechanical offset) allows a shooter to make better use of cover, if forced to shoot over the barrier. Many head injuries are attributed to the large mechanical offset of modern assault rifles...

    The other reason I like it is for the safety - keeping a straight trigger finger alongside the triggerguard, you can, in one smooth motion, disable the safety and mash the trigger. Not a great trigger pull in that case, but good enough at close range. 2 "Brass Fetcher thumbs up" for the M-1 Carbine!
     
  22. Dave Markowitz

    Dave Markowitz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,887
    Location:
    Plymouth Meeting, PA
    Great test, thanks for posting this. It makes me happy to see the M1 Carbine feeling the love on THR. :)
     
  23. vanfunk

    vanfunk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    665
    Location:
    The widening gyre
    Great info! I agree that the "little carbine that could" should command more respect than it does. When compared to its big brother the Garand, of course it comes up short - it's not a full-power battle rifle and was never intended to be. As a replacement for a pistol, it offers greatly enhanced hit probability, increased range and much more wounding potential than any service handgun. One of my uncles actually spoke very highly of the one he used in Korea; he used to say that everyone he shot with it suddenly became "fully cooperative". Didn't Jim Cirillo also report 100% success with the carbine on the NYPD stakeout team?

    I love my carbines. I have little doubt that the carbine would be an effective defensive tool inside of 150 yards. I still prefer a lightweight AR as a fighting gun, but the M1 carbine is a viable choice.

    vanfunk
     
  24. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,812
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    I believe Preacherman pointed out that the reason
    the.30 carbine did not kill well in winter time in Korea
    or during the Battle of the Bulge is cardiovascular
    constriction due to cold weather: gunshot wounds
    just don't bleed as quickly in cold weather.

    Another poster who searched dead enemy soldiers for
    maps and other intel in Korea said that soldiers wearing
    the Chinese winter coats who were shot with .30 carbine
    usually had complete through-and-through penetration.

    I suspect that enemy soldiers shot at with M2 carbines
    in Korea simply were not hit: the M2 on full auto just
    is not very accurate.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page