Beam scale

Nomes

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2023
Messages
58
I have a Lyman that is at least 50 yrs. old it seems to work well and no I don't do competition shooting.
Is it time for a new one?
 
I have a Lyman that was purchased new 40 years ago. Piece of garbage.
I also have a Redding that is much older than that, and it's a NICE piece! Much more precise and better made. Moves a LOT more freely than the Lyman. Has a dipper/paddle that goes down into a pool of oil that dampens its very free movement. Gives extremely precise results. It's the only scale/balance I use.

hD123mm.jpg


7tzbaS7.jpg


tElge6z.jpg
 
Yep, I too have a Redding No. 1. I don't use it much anymore, sometimes oil is messy. Last time I checked it, with mineral oil in reservoir it was right on with check weights. Taken care of and they will last beyond The Rapture. Have no Idea how old it is...
 
I also have the Redding beam scale N2omike describes along with a Herter's Model 5 "Technical Ballistic Laboratory" hehe, torsion wire balance. I use both depending on my mood. I'm pretty careful with the torsion wire scale so as not to damage the frog-hair wire. Both scales check well against both calibration weights and a small electronic scale. The only bad thing, if it is, is that the oil from the reservoir seems to capillary out of the well and eventually coat the entire scale. I think the crinkly finish on both contribute to the oil flow. Maybe if I used some heavier oil, such as the 30 wt noted in mike's picture it might alleviate the problem. I've always used clean mineral oil, which is pretty light viscosity. So, yes, they are a little messy...

Also makes me wonder whether Herter had Redding make his scales. But, I suppose crinkly finishes were pretty common in those days.

-West out
 
The only bad thing, if it is, is that the oil from the reservoir seems to capillary out of the well and eventually coat the entire scale. I think the crinkly finish on both contribute to the oil flow. Maybe if I used some heavier oil, such as the 30 wt noted in mike's picture it might alleviate the problem. I've always used clean mineral oil, which is pretty light viscosity. So, yes, they are a little messy...
I use heavy motor oil, don't fill it all the way to the top, and don't have any issue with it seeping out. Could even use gear oil. The thicker the oil, the better it will dampen... with no loss in accuracy. I don't even own an electronic scale. I prefer the manual balance. I believe my dad picked this up used at a gun show 40+ years ago for cheap. Glad he did! I'm 55 and started reloading with a Lyman Spar-T turret press before I had my driver's license. Lyman was pretty low quality compared to RCBS, Redding, etc back then. But, sometimes 'cheap' is a quality overcoming many faults. lol

Have since upgraded the Lyman powder measure, scale, case trimmer, etc. But ironically, replaced the old Spar-T turret press with the new Lyman turret. MUCH nicer piece, minus the priming system. Later found it was a copy of one that Redding sells. lol Lyman seems to have stepped things up a bit since back then.
 
I went back in time with my last press purchase. I think i got the last ''new'' one available. I forget if i got it from Cabela's or Amazon. One of them was out of stock. It was this set here.
 
I have a Lyman that is at least 50 yrs. old it seems to work well ... Is it time for a new one?
My Ohaus 10-10 is probably similar in age and I do not plan on replacing it as it verifies check weights down to 0.1 gr - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-unlimited-budget.912629/page-2#post-12465906

Get yourself ASTM Class 6 Troemner check weight set for $29 (Made in USA) and if scale verifies accurate, I would keep the scale - https://www.amazon.com/Troemner-151...icate-Stainless/dp/B078H9VQ5Z/ref=sr_1_8?th=1
 
I have a Lyman that is at least 50 yrs. old it seems to work well and no I don't do competition shooting.
Is it time for a new one?
Some people will never give up their beam scale. Sort of like the folks that still write checks at the grocery store and carry a flip-phone. Beams are accurate to a tenth of a grain and that’s not good enough (for me).
I obtain .02 gn +/- accuracy from my digital. And I use Apple Pay at Costco
 
I would never verify a beam scale with an electronic scale but would not hesitate to verify an electronic scale with a beam scale. I would never verify a dial caliper with an electronic caliper but wouldn't hesitate verify an electronic with a dial caliper. You can see where I am going here.

I do not own and electronic scale. It's not because of my purchasing inability with cell phones or at grocery stores. It's because of the reviews I have read about them.
 
Last edited:
I don't write checks or have a flip phone but I do use an Ohaus 10-10 after using a digital with dispenser for years. Digitals are fine as long as they are designed well and can tolerate air currents and fluorescent lights. Mine also got glitchy. I only use the beam scale to set my weight on the micrometer stem in my powder dispenser. Using the dispenser with micrometer is oh so fast, easy and accurate.
 
I have a RCBS 502 that I have used for years and it works good for me. I also have check weights I use all the time. It’s not real fast but I have the rest of my life and I hope it is a long one.
 
Some people will never give up their beam scale. Sort of like the folks that still write checks at the grocery store and carry a flip-phone. Beams are accurate to a tenth of a grain and that’s not good enough (for me).
I obtain .02 gn +/- accuracy from my digital. And I use Apple Pay at Costco
How about good enough to see the impact of a kernel of H4831...

zz17tpoh.jpg


Is that accurate enough for ya?

Just a cleaned up 50+ year old 10-10 with a little magnification.
 
Gravity has not changed much in the last 50 years.

N6ixH7V.jpg



I don't trust electronic scales when the weather is cold. Had too much scale drift with modern electronic scales. That is when I take out this Redding. The only trick is to remember the scale on the left is in 5 grain increments. The one on the right is tenths of a grain.
 
Back
Top