Not sure where this should go, or if there's already a discussion, but...
There was a grizzly attack in Canda last week that killed a couple and their dog. It appears that they did everything right. Hung their food in a tree away from camp, etc. Reports are that park rangers found their tent smashed and their e-readers out, so it looks like they might have been attacked while in their tent. What grabbed my attention was the statement "One can of bear pray had been fully discharged, but htis bear was not to be determined."
I spend a lot of time in the Alaska woods. I've long been a proponent of bear spray. (I'm in the minority on that up here.) But for about the past 7-8 years, I've also carried a revolver. Alaska's laws are such that killing a bear out of season is worth risking your life to avoid the hassle. This past hunting season, I opted to leave the revolver at home. I mean...it's an absolute boat anchor. Never, for a second, do you forget that you have it on you. I also haven't run across a bear in the wild in quite a few years. On one trip this past hunting season, we had a mechanical failure and ended up spending the night in our side by side. My hunting partner had also left his pistol at home. It was an uneventful night, aside from the cold, but that experience and this article really has me rethinking.
Needless to say, I won't be leaving the revolver behind anymore, although I may leave the spray behind from now on. I definitely no longer buy the line from US Fish and Wildlife that spray is better than bullets, although, I'm sure that debate will go on; it's not unlike the 9mm vs 45acp debate, or, for that matter, 70s disco-that crap will never die.
Here's a link to one of, I'm sure, many articles on the event.
The relative of one of the victims of a fatal bear attack in Canada’s Banff National Park says he received an SOS call and message from the couple.
www.foxnews.com