Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Before NFA?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by ccsniper, Jan 2, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ccsniper

    ccsniper member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    1,621
    Location:
    midwest Arkansas
    I was wondering if anyone knew what the prices of full auto firearms were before 1934? I would like to know cause I just watched public enemies and thought about how much they were and how available. Could you just walk into any hardware/gun store and pick one up?
     
  2. PTK

    PTK Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,712
    Location:
    Montana
    The Thompson gun was nearly $200, IIRC. And you'd generally order from the company, not many stores were going to stock something worth 6 months of pay.
     
  3. mp5a3

    mp5a3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    366
    My dealer in DFW Texas, Nick Tilotta, who has around 90 full auto Tommy guns from the 1920's said that Tommy Guns were sold in hardware stores for around $200. That was a great deal of money then. I've handled many of his guns and they're a work of art. Handmade and very heavy.
     
  4. mp5a3

    mp5a3 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    366
  5. General Geoff

    General Geoff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Location:
    Allentown, Pennsylvania
    Just as a comparison: in 1927, you could buy a brand new Ford Model T for ~$250. So yes, $200 for a firearm was very expensive indeed.
     
  6. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,765
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    And remember, in 1934 when the NFA was passed, the tax at that time was still $200. I don't think the intent of that could have been anything other than a defacto ban, since no one but the very rich could have afforded that. 76 years later it is still keeping out the "average" gun owner, but since the amount has never been corrected for inflation, the "average joe" can pay the tax if he wants to.

    The '86 new machine gun ban has effectively relegated machine guns only to the wealthy. But not because of the tax.
     
  7. 545days

    545days Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2007
    Messages:
    180
    Location:
    TX
    What $200 invested in 1928 would be worth today (compounded annually over 81 years)

    At 10% $450,648.05
    at 9% $215,068.26
    at 8% $101,942.24
    at 7% $47,986.16
    at 6% $22,428.75
    at 5% $10,407.90

    According to the US Bureau of Labor Stastics, the buying value of $200 in 1928 would be the equivalent of $2,530.18 in 2009 (the calculator won't calculate for 2010 yet.)

    The S&P500 compound annual growth rate from Jan 1 1928 to Dec 31, 2008 was 9.32%, so if your grandfather had invested $200 on Jan 1 1928, it would be worth $272,708.99

    I don't know what a mint 1928 Thompson goes for today, but it looks like the stock market probably beat it.
     
  8. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,765
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    And the primary reason that gun would be worth what it is today is because of the 86 ban, not natural market forces. I assume a mint 1920s model would have some inherent collectors value regardless of the '86 ban, but the '86 ban is still going to be a big factor.
     
  9. sumpnz

    sumpnz Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    2,276
    Location:
    Sedro-Woolley, WA
    Prior to the '86 ban, from what I understand, FA guns were only nominally more expensive than their semi-auto equivalents. Not counting the tax stamp. E.g. if an AR-15 in 1985 would have sold for, say $400, an M-16 would have sold for $500-600 before the tax stamp. Not saying that's what the actual prices were, just an illustration. In fact I seem to recall seeing a non-transferable M-4 at a gun show that was advertised for sale for $800 a few years ago. You had to be a LEA to buy it, but the price was within $100 of the semi-auto only M-4geries a few tables down the aisle.
     
  10. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,765
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    In the case of an AR-15, the only differences between select fire and semi-only are a slightly different carrier (in some cases) and different shaped trigger parts, plus one extra trigger part (sometimes requiring an extra pin hole in the receiver). If there is even $100 difference in retail, that is coming from something other than the actual cost differences in the parts.
     
  11. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,842
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Off the investment and back to gun prices: In 1982, a brand-new full-auto Thompson retailed for around $740 plus sales tax. I test-fired one at a dealer's before he made delivery.

    In the WW II era, a Model 70 Winchester retailed for around $54, from an ad I saw in an American Rifleman of that era. The SuperGrade was around $70 or so.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page