Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Beretta 92FS

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by CCantu357, Feb 3, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. CCantu357

    CCantu357 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    50
    Considering buying a 92FS, but cannot decide if I want the standard blue model or the Inox model with wood grips. I notice the Inox now has black controls. Is there any advantage to the Inox model? I have seen some reviews say the finish rubs off.
     
  2. hq

    hq Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    1,138
    Location:
    Finland
    Eventually yes, but the black finish ('bruniton') seems much more durable than regular bluing. My 92F has fairly severe holster wear but that's a result of two decades of semi-regular carry use. Given the choice, I'd prefer Inox, mainly because wear is less visible, resistance to rust and corrosion is better and stainless steel is easier to refinish by media blasting and/or polishing. But that's just me, of course.
     
  3. Kiln

    Kiln Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Messages:
    2,465
    Maybe look at the Taurus model? I've heard nothing but good about the Taurus 92 copy and they're cheaper with a lifetime warranty. Beretta will only cover the gun for 3 years (I think).

    Both have had the locking block redesigned to fix the issue that the pistol used to have with constantly breaking that part. Another bonus to the Taurus PT92 is the frame mounted safety. It is just easier to operate IMO.
     
  4. tarosean

    tarosean Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    Messages:
    5,403
    Location:
    TX
    Inox holds its value better.. Otherwise its just a preference...
     
  5. 1goodshot

    1goodshot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    168
    Location:
    chandler,Az
    I like the black ones better but have a friend who only likes the stainless. Id get the one you like. I think the Italian ones come with all stainless controls while the American made ones come with black.
     
  6. JonnyGringo

    JonnyGringo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    50
    The blued finish is going to wear off with holster use. The rate at which this happens will depend on the type of holster used. Since you will end up with a partially shiny gun anyhow, you should go with the Inox, especially for future resale potential.
     
  7. Russ Jackson

    Russ Jackson member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    Messages:
    564
    Look at the Taurus PT92.
     
  8. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,651
    Location:
    USA

    If you are talking about Beretta's "Bruniton" finish, it is extremely durable. I've had an M85FS for about ten years that I CCW about half the time, and re-holster the gun each morning and night to check it, so its gone in and out of a holster A LOT. It shows no finish wear as of yet.
     
  9. JonnyGringo

    JonnyGringo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    50
    This picture taken yesterday (ignore the SIG) is what I'm talking about. All holster contact points are heavily worn after a few years of heavy use in a Fobus holster. Different materials will wear on the finish differently.
     

    Attached Files:

  10. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,651
    Location:
    USA
    The Fobus holster is plastic, right? The Bianchi holster I carry the 85FS in is ballistic nylon. The harder surface must affect the finish more. I only use leather or nylon holsters, so no experience with the Fobus. I've even carried what some consider the fragily blued HK P7 in a nylon holster for years with no visible wear.
     
  11. JonnyGringo

    JonnyGringo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2013
    Messages:
    50
    Yes it's plastic. I used to carry another 92fs concealed by use of an 'in the pants' style holster which was made out of fabric (Uncle Mikes) which also wore through the finish after a few years of heavy use. I shoot a lot, therefore use my holster a lot. My holsters wear out too. The OP is concerned with potential for the finish on the gun to wear out. My experience on two separate guns of the same model with two different types of holster indicate that this is not only possible, but likely under certain circumstances.
     
  12. CCantu357

    CCantu357 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    50
    Thanks. I really like the look of the Inox, just want it do be as durable as most SS finish guns. And yes I have looked at PT92, but not a big fan. Prefer the quality and pedigree of the Beretta
     
  13. jdh

    jdh Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2008
    Messages:
    967
    "Look at the Taurus PT92."

    Russ there was a time when I would have agreed with you. However now, as Taurus quality has slacked a bit and Beretta quality has increased a bit, with the prices of the two near equal I will have to say the Beretta is the better bargain now.
     
  14. berettaprofessor

    berettaprofessor Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,861
    Location:
    Kansas
    The Inox will be more durable and have a higher resale.
     
  15. cyclopsshooter

    cyclopsshooter Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    2,241
    Location:
    The Shadow Knows...
    I like the older Inox pistols before they went to black plastic small parts but just picked up a M9A1 (with plastic parts) thinking of getting the steel trigger and guiderod upgrades but wow the pistol shoots tight groups.. just not sure I want to dink with something already preforming so well. I also like the US factory roll-marks better than the Italian ones.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page