Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Berry's 148 Grain Plated HBWC...anybody use them?

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by LeonCarr, Jul 12, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. LeonCarr

    LeonCarr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,819
    Location:
    At The Range
    Hey Folks,

    I just picked up some Berry's .38 caliber 148 Grain Copper Plated HBWCs, and have a few questions.

    Is loading data interchangeable with the 148 Grain Lead HBWC? I have used the search feature on several different forums, and surfed the powder and bullet sites also. I have been unable to find any specific data for the plated HBWC.

    Is accuracy on par with the Lead HBWC?

    Hopefully some of the experienced reloaders and match shooters here on THR have some experience with this bullet.

    Thanks in advance,
    LeonCarr
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2007
  2. JJE

    JJE Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2005
    Messages:
    348
    Location:
    SW Washington State!
    I've loaded a bunch of the plated HBWCs and DEWCs. People often say, go ahead and use the lead data. Rainier make equivalent bullets (supposedly with a slightly heavier plating) and they recommend on their website using lead data. I shot both types of WC over 3.5 gr W231 in a +P rated snubby and a .357 revolver. Since the WC is a target bullet, the loading data for lead WCs is for light accurate loads rather than max-pressure loads.

    The copper plating is harder and causes more friction than lead, so you are going to lose some velocity (and get higher peak pressure) compared to a lead WC (maybe losing 50-100 fps depending on barrel length). If you use lead data, it's possible that the plated bullet will be moving too slowly to stabilize and you won't get the same accuracy as a lead WC. That's why I increased the W231 load from the 3.0 gr that is usually recommended for lead to 3.5 gr when I saw that my plated WCs would occasionally keyhole at 3.0 gr. Since I was shooting a +P .38 and a .357, I wasn't too concerned about the increased pressure. The plated bullets seemed to consistently fly straight with the higher charge.

    I would say that it's possible to get the same accuracy with plated as with lead, but not by simply using lead data. You'd have to invest some time at the range to get the right load for your gun. Turns out I'm not a good enough shot to see any difference.:eek:
     
    Last edited: Jul 12, 2007
  3. GunCSI

    GunCSI Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    I used the Berry's plated WC and interchanged loading data with no problems. I wasn't all that happy with the results no matter what powder charge I used. I just couldn't get them to group like the lead version. I have good luck with their .40 and .45 bullets but the WC's just didn't do well enough for me to buy any more.
     
  4. Black_Talon

    Black_Talon Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2003
    Messages:
    863
    Location:
    Peoples Republik of **********
    I tried them too, and could never get them to shoot as accurately as plain 'ol lead HBWCs, no matter what I tried, load-wise. I tried them anywhere from 625 to 850 fps, using BE, 231 and some VV powder (320 maybe?).

    I don't really see a need for them anyhow. Regular swadged HBWCs have never leaded any gun I've ever shot them in, as long as the velocity is kept below 800fps. My standard 38 spl 148 gr HBWC load give me around 720-750 out of a 6" barrel, and is extremely accurate. No need to push them any faster than that, IMO.
     
  5. EddieCoyle

    EddieCoyle Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2005
    Messages:
    1,231
    Location:
    Massachusetts
    OK, I'm going to be different. I found them at least as accurate, and maybe more accurate than lead out of my 3" barrel S&W Model 65. I loaded them over 3.1 grains of Titegroup. This load is a tad hotter than the 2.7 grains I use for lead.
     
  6. grosland

    grosland Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2007
    Messages:
    13
    Location:
    Paradis, LA
    I also get great accuracy with the Rainier 148 DEWC behind 3.0 grains of TiteGroup. Have had no problems with keyholing and the load is relatively clean to shoot. I'm shooting them in a S&W 686 6" but my brother shoots them in his Rossi 4" with the same positive results.

    I just loaded a bunch of Rainier 158 FP's with TiteGroup but have not yet shot any of them.

    These are the only bullets that my local supplier had on hand and has been having them for quite some time. The boxes were dusty and with old price stickers on them. I don't know why shooters are bypassing these bullets; I tend to like them. I took some more off his hands for $44/1000 plus tax.
    grosland
     
  7. LeonCarr

    LeonCarr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Messages:
    3,819
    Location:
    At The Range
    Thanks to all for the great information.

    Thanks again,
    LeonCarr
     
  8. Foton

    Foton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2007
    Messages:
    23
    Old Post resurrected

    Greetings,

    I'm in the same boat as the OP, just picked up some of Berrys Plated HBWC in .38spcl. and though Ive looked in Lymans, Speer, Hornady etc. havent found any load data for plated or jacketed in the HBWC profile.....

    I'll be shooting these out of 4" and 3" S&W barrels, the 3" is a +p the 4" is NOT - so Im a bit concerned about getting it right. Generally Ive been loading W231 and Bullseye with Dardas cast SWC and have had no problems at 3.2 and 3.4gr, the guns seem to love them but they loads are smokey. In the hopes of reducing smoke I bought some of the plated and am now looking for data and experiences.

    Anyone have any suggestions - at the moment I dont have a Chrony.

    TIA
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page