Best bipod for the money?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Atlas are great, but if you’re spending the money beyond a Harris, get an MDT Cyke pod. Exceptionally versatile, the legs will go seemingly anywhere, and lock rigidly. The double pull and triple pull are super slick for field shooting also, with crazy tall max heights, still in a “prone-able” minimum height.

If you’re spending any money beyond a $100 Harris you recommend a $1000 bipod next?
 
If you’re spending any money beyond a $100 Harris you recommend a $1000 bipod next?

Yes.

You’re not getting anything new, despite spending hundreds of dollars more, until you get to that $700 Cyke pod. Atlas has 45degree legs, but in general, you’re not gaining 3x the value there. The Cyke pod puts a leg anywhere you need it, so if your life involves a frequent instances where you need a leg where a conventional bipod can’t put one, then it’s the next worthwhile investment.
 
I know several responded with Harris knockoff being the answer for casual or hunting but I strongly disagree. When it comes to activities involving shooting, ammo expense is considerable over time. The amount of money spent hunting is also no trivial amount, let alone my desire for a successful, humane harvest.

Pursuant to the above, I would strongly recommend the Harris being the first rung on the ladder and that’s not speaking ill of Harris, simply noting in my mind the recognizable uptick in durability, design, and and value.
 
It's not rocket science to reverse engineer a bipod. The Harris sling-swivel mount pods aren't very complicated. If you don't need the rapid deployment and adjustability features that the PRS shooters like then a knockoff might work just fine.

I use the Cvlife ones from amazon.

These days, I mainly use a bipod as an alternative to a front rest when shooting off of a bench. I recently got a carbon-fiber CVlife and it is as stable as my Harris.
 
It's not rocket science to reverse engineer a bipod. The Harris sling-swivel mount pods aren't very complicated. If you don't need the rapid deployment and adjustability features that the PRS shooters like then a knockoff might work just fine.

That is correct. But there is still a noticeable difference in the quality of the knockoff bipods versus the Harris bipods. I can definitely tell the difference between my Harris and Caldwell bipods. The Harris is more solid and stable.

That being said, the cheap knockoffs will work okay for casual use from a bench or prone positions and occasional hunting use.
 
It's not rocket science to reverse engineer a bipod. The Harris sling-swivel mount pods aren't very complicated. If you don't need the rapid deployment and adjustability features that the PRS shooters like then a knockoff might work just fine.



These days, I mainly use a bipod as an alternative to a front rest when shooting off of a bench. I recently got a carbon-fiber CVlife and it is as stable as my Harris.
I did some research a while back and pretty much every review listed the CVLife as one of the best despite the very affordable price. I have no complaints.

MmHut-t7Idijm1Z3Ui2oXDFPRydvSVA5xOVPOL2Rt_5EsDQ4yFubLdOoYAGxe405Er4u1Dg=w1102-h826-no?authuser=0.jpg
 
That is correct. But there is still a noticeable difference in the quality of the knockoff bipods versus the Harris bipods. I can definitely tell the difference between my Harris and Caldwell bipods. The Harris is more solid and stable.
I admit I've only used 6-9" knockoffs, but I don't see much difference in stability, maybe taller ones are different. What I do notice is the sloppy tolerances in the sling swivel attachments. When I pull the cheap one out of the range bag invariably one or both of the ears have flopped around and I have to fish them back thru the slot it's a slight PITA.
 
I admit I've only used 6-9" knockoffs, but I don't see much difference in stability, maybe taller ones are different. What I do notice is the sloppy tolerances in the sling swivel attachments. When I pull the cheap one out of the range bag invariably one or both of the ears have flopped around and I have to fish them back thru the slot it's a slight PITA.

How the bipod mounts to the rifle is part of its stability too. So looser tolerances at the sling swivel mount will lead to less stability. And when comparing my Caldwell to my Harris, there are differences in how tight or loose the legs are too.
 
How the bipod mounts to the rifle is part of its stability too.
They're fine once you get them attached, the PITA is getting it attached. The sling swivel mount pods all have the same or at least very similar rubber lining to keep from marring the stock.
 
I did find with mine that after my first range session I had to re-tighten it down, same with the second session but not as bad but by the third time it was fine. Probably I didn't tighten it down enough the first two times.
 
I have and have had Caldwell, Blackhawk, and “Winchester” branded Harris knock-offs; 6-9”, 9-13”, and 13-27” ballparks; some for only a few years, some for more than 25yrs. I haven’t struggled to shoot small from the knock offs, but I also have felt the wiggle and shift of the mounts, and the yielding give of the legs when I preloaded. The differences are real. Substantial? Eh, guess it depends on how demanding you’ll be of your gear - like I mention, I have a Kmart sold, Winchester branded 13-27” knock off which would be ~25yrs old, and I’ve killed handfuls of deer, and hundreds of coyotes and hogs from it over the years. It’s not as rigid as my Harris version, but I paid $93 plus tax in the late 1990s for the Harris, and only paid $49.99 for the “Winchester” a few months later… both still work for the tasks I ask of them. Do I recommend the Winchester/knock off? Nope. Do I recommend the Harris? Highly. I can’t really say my knock off has held up this long because of quality, but maybe moreso because of recognition and concession - I don’t baby my gear, but I do spend extra attention to avoid breaking stuff I might consider to be breakable.

And at the other end of the spectrum, at the PRS Midwest Regional Finale last month, someone in my squad had a squib round and lodged a bullet 3” down his bore… seeing us tapping with rocks on a cleaning rod, one of the guys from the squad behind us brought over his MDT double-pull Cyke Pod and used the arca clamp like a hammerhead to drive out the bullet… might not have been my first thought with an $1000 bipod set up, but he swung it like something was gonna give, or something was gonna give…
 
Harris. Most of us choose one of their notched legs models without the swivel (tilt) feature. Believe me, I've read a boatload of Harris bipod threads on a variety of discussion forums. My preference is the Harris 6-9 inch size.
 
Ever seen a used one for sale. Where do we find those at?

I have but they’re usually priced close to what a new one costs. If you run across one priced close to what a Harris cost you better be quick about snagging it.

Like most have already stated, the Harris is the best bang for the buck. I’d forego the knock-offs. They just don’t hold up, therefore, it’s no bargain
 
I’ll throw this into the discussion- I have these two bipods from Leapers/UTG and I’ve been impressed. That being said, I shoot from a tabletop at the outdoor range. They are solid, all metal, and I really like the included sling stud/rail adapter, which can also be purchased separately. I ordered a half dozen or so, and just leave them on the rifles. The overbore takes up some real estate on the bench but it’s rock solid. They both are. 34332D5F-64C6-48B9-B4E1-F05145C512A6.jpeg F0F4054D-DA60-4DF8-BC0F-6842AFE2D345.jpeg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top