Best handgun SHTF caliber and weight

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Feb 25, 2005
Messages
448
Location
Houston, Texas
YMMV, but I think (normally being a 45acp guy) that the best bullet one can have for SHTF in his/her handgun is a 9mm 147 grain FMJ bullet. It provides incredible penetration through a variety of obstacles, is a quieter bullet, has less recoil than snappier 124 grain loads, and did I mention penetration? Normally I would choose FMJ .45acp as the way to go but recently I gave it some thought and I have come to the conclusion that in SHTF penetration is number 1, not wound channel size. I'm not talking about everyday situations, only SHTF. And please, no caliber wars:neener:
What do you guys think?
 
I'll buy into your 9mm theory as long as I can have a Glock 18 and a backpack full of loaded 33 round mags. :evil:
Seriously though, let me be the first to say "Shot placement is more important than caliber".
 
with the rifle caliber debates, I normally side with the folks who want the smaller, lighter cartridges, with this though, i dunno how much of a weight advantage 9mm has over .45. Capacity yes. I myself am a '9 is fine' camper, its what I shoot the best, and what I have.

A g19 with a ton of mags would be my SHTF pistol. My 26 would be in my boot or something.
 
.45 acp, Glock 21 all the way, if it has to stay concealed for the time being. Otherwise I would go for a rifle if I knew I was going to a gunfight.

My G27 is the always gun though. It would not be a bad contender in the SHTF scenario with the 29 rd mag on board. Normally I dont carry a spare mag.
 
curious why in "SHTF" penetration would be more important?
+1
I would think it would be better to put them on the ground and that would make me go 45
 
I do not mean penetration in flesh, I mean penetration of objects. This would be exceptionally true if you live in a big city with countless numbers of large structures and cars.
 
If you want maximum penetration, why 9mm over 158 gr .357 magnum then? 147 gr @ 990 fps vs. 158 gr @ 1235 fps = no contest. I could see why you wouldn't want .41 or .44, since those are a little more scarce, but .357 and .38 are common enough that you'd have a fair chance of scavenging or trading for some.

According to my Crazy Insane Terminal Ballistics Calculator (patent pending), performance of handgun rounds is as follows (all figures assume the bullets don't tumble or deform):

147 gr @ 990 fps 9mm
ballistic gelatin: 33.6"
generic wood: 12.1"
mild steel: 0.113" (assuming a solid block; more penetration for sheet steel)

158 gr @ 1235 fps .357
ballistic gelatin: 41.5"
generic wood: 17.1"
mild steel: 0.185"

180 gr @ 1015 fps .40 S&W
ballistic gelatin: 33.0"
generic wood: 12.0"
mild steel: 0.115"

230 gr @ 860 fps .45
ballistic gelatin: 29.3"
generic wood: 9.6"
mild steel: 0.083"

So 9mm and .40 S&W are just about tied, and both have an advantage over .45. But .357 magnum is the king, in this case.
 
I guess the old king (357 MAG) must have slipped my mind...I suppose I was referring to autoloaders. Without a doubt though if I had to have a revolver in a SHTF situation it would be a GP-100 with a 4" barrel and 180 grain FMJ loads running around 1100 FPS:what:
But in an autoloader, the 147 grain @ 1000 FPS 9mm FMJ takes the cake.
 
There's always the Georgia Arms (147gr @ 1050fps) or Double Tap (147gr @ 1135fps) 9mm options, but then I noticed the original poster mention FMJ ammo. In the case of using FMJ only, I'd probably want a bigger caliber.

Actually, if SHTF (however your version works), I'd want at least one long gun to use before I needed to worry about which handgun round works the best.
 
I've got a couple of 9mm's, but my regular carry guns are .40's. And I'd stay with a good HP round in either case. A pistol is the last line of defense, it's what you use to fight your way to a real gun. With expanding ammo you have an improved chance of incapacitating the BG quickly if/when you hit him.
 
I vote for a .357 - far more versatile. In SHTF you might have to hunt, shoot through car doors, who knows what. Get a variety of .357 ammo from 125 grain .38 special hollowpoints to 200 grain .357 hardcast and you should be able to handle it all. Plus, you can get a lightweight 7 or 8-shot revolver if weight is really the main issue.
 
Glock 20. 15+1 10mm.

It's like a .357 revolver. With three instant reloads.
 
zahc said:
Glock 20. 15+1 10mm.

It's like a .357 revolver. With three instant reloads.

I was thinking the same thing. Why have a 9mm when you can have a 10mm...
 
I have a question about the 9mm. I am not slamming

the people who prefer it. Here is my question: Since the 9mm. became the carry of law enforcement we see more people shot repeatedly with the 9mm. before being brought down.

I have a 9mm. and would not want to have my life depend on it. I know, I know the ballestics are far superior to the .38 Spl. I prefer the .38+P, .357 and the .45.

One of the advantages that is repeated is that you can carry more rds. in the handgun. Do you really need more rds. capacity if the .45 does the job with 1 rd.?
 
I shoot my 9mm better than any .45 I've shot. For me, I'd rather have good shot placement than a 'superior caliber'. Thats a whole nother debate.
 
Ryan M:

Close, but my 158/357 loads do 1550. Nice horsepower there.

I also vote 357 for SHTF. Why? Look at rounds per pound and rounds per square foot of storage space. VERY tough to beat. And in my book 9mm ain't got enough oomph. This statement is NOT A FLAME WAR STARTER, just my opinion. If you are comfortable with 9mm, fine by me.
 
Add one more vote for the 357 in 158 grain jhp or jsp with the rifle to match.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top