Quantcast

Best No. +P ammo for S&W 640 Centennial

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Mikey5oh, Dec 4, 2019 at 7:15 PM.

  1. Mikey5oh

    Mikey5oh Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2019
    Messages:
    1
    Hi all, Suggestions for the best defense Non +P round for a Smith and Wesson 640 Centennial.

    Thanks
     
  2. 351 WINCHESTER

    351 WINCHESTER Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,484
    Location:
    NE FL
    Buffalo Bore wadcutter.
     
  3. SteadyD

    SteadyD Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2017
    Messages:
    788
    Are you looking for something that is low recoil?
     
  4. rabid wombat

    rabid wombat Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2014
    Messages:
    269
    Location:
    TX
  5. SeanSw

    SeanSw Member

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2005
    Messages:
    1,087
    Location:
    Central IL
    Buffalo Bore or Underwood Ammo standard pressure wadcutters and sem-wadcutter hollow points. Anything's better than nothing though.
     
    .308 Norma and Lucky Derby like this.
  6. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    15,699
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    Be warned... BB stuff is not fun to shoot in a J frame even in their non +p flavors. Maybe it’s better in 640s than aluminum frames though.
     
    SteadyD likes this.
  7. Gary A

    Gary A Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,653
    Winchester Defend, 130 grain, has gotten some good reviews. It did pretty well in the Lucky Gunner tests. https://www.luckygunner.com/labs/revolver-ballistics-test/. The 640 Centennial is noted to be a very strong J-frame. Is your reason for using standard pressure for concerns about the revolver or concern about recoil? Some of the earlier Model 640s were factory marked “+P+” and it was chosen as the base for the first J-frame .357 because if its inherent strength. Aside from the Winchester Defend ammo, I favor plain 158 semi-wadcutters in standard pressure.
     
  8. fordtrucks

    fordtrucks Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2016
    Messages:
    194
    Wadcutter. Check luckygunner’s reviews and data set on the 38.
     
    LUCKYDAWG13 likes this.
  9. fordtrucks

    fordtrucks Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2016
    Messages:
    194
    Gordon likes this.
  10. SpangledHatch

    SpangledHatch Member

    Joined:
    Tuesday
    Messages:
    1
    Another Buffalo Bore option...

    Standard Pressure Short Barrel Low Flash Heavy .38 Special Ammo
    125gr. Jacketed Hollow Point - (900 fps/M.E. 225 ft. lbs.)


    ITEM 20E

    These are loaded with Speer Gold Dots.

    I occasionally carry a mid-70s Mod. 60 and feel very comfortable with these rounds.
     
  11. Ratshooter

    Ratshooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,618
    Location:
    Burleson,Texas
  12. Gordon
    • Contributing Member

    Gordon Contributing Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    9,687
    Location:
    Southern Oregon
    I have switched to the Federal 130 HST Micro which IS +p rated but does not recoil as bad as the 158 grain loads and the 642 is plenty stout ! This load is devastating in the recent testing i've done and just does nt blast and roar and kick as
    others I used before.
     
    Last edited: Dec 7, 2019 at 6:24 PM
  13. Steve C

    Steve C Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2006
    Messages:
    4,776
    Like Gordon, I carry the .38 spl +P Federal 130 HST Micro loaded in my S&W 637 EDC. It does well in the Gel tests and the Federal HST's have a good reputation so they seem to be one of the better options. The only down side I find with them is they are difficult to reload quickly as the short bullet is like a Wadcutter and doesn't align with the chambers as easy as a longer nosed bullet does, so my reloads in Safariland speed loaders are Remington Golden Sabers.

    I don't find the recoil of +P ammo to be difficult to control in the air weight. But my perspective on recoil has changed after shooting a S&W 500 a couple years ago and don't find anything I own having much recoil compared to that.
     
    Gordon likes this.
  14. Wishoot

    Wishoot Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,484
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    I was using 135gr +p Gold Dots, but accuracy suffered.

    I switched to 110gr Hornady FTX's and really like what I see. Very easy to shoot out of my J-Frame, accurate and quick follow up shots..
     
  15. tbob38

    tbob38 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2005
    Messages:
    293
    Location:
    Utah's Dixie
    I've done the same.
     
    Gordon likes this.
  16. Gary A

    Gary A Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,653
    It is perhaps worth noting that the OP asked about a *640* Centennial, not a 642 or other airweight. The 640 has always been a steel-framed revolver, heavier and stronger than 642s. It could have been a typo, I suppose. Even the older, .38 only 640 Centennials are plenty strong enough for any current plus P loads, so I assume recoil might be the issue.
     
    Gordon likes this.
  17. Ratshooter

    Ratshooter Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    Messages:
    3,618
    Location:
    Burleson,Texas
    I wondered why the OP wanted non +P ammo and just thought it for lower recoil. Since his gun is rated for real 38 Special ammo it will easily handle the +P loads that are at best the same as original 38 Special loads. Reducing bullet weight goes a long way towards reducing recoil.
     
    Gordon and fordtrucks like this.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice