Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Best self defense ammo for an LCP .380?

Discussion in 'Handguns: General Discussion' started by Buck1959, Jun 25, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Buck1959

    Buck1959 Member

    Joined:
    May 29, 2013
    Messages:
    9
    Location:
    South Florida
    I recieved my CWP last week and have started carrying a Ruger LCP .380.
    I was told by a local gun shop that the only thing that works well in that gun is Hornady 380 critical defense. Of course, even online there is none to be found.

    So my question to fellow LCP carriers, what ammo works well for you?
     
  2. Tomac

    Tomac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2003
    Messages:
    754
    Location:
    Caldwell, Idaho
    Shot placement and sufficient penetration are paramount, all else is secondary.
    Expanding rds for the .380 don't have sufficient penetration so it's FMJ/solids only for the wife's Kahr P380 (Buffalo Bore 100gr hard cast).
    If I had to use an expanding rd for the .380 I'd look at the CorBon DPX all-copper or the similar Buffalo Bore loading.
    Tomac
     
  3. Deus Machina

    Deus Machina Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2007
    Messages:
    2,228
    Location:
    Brandon, Florida
    In Florida, you don't have to worry about heavy clothes being in the way.
    I also don't strictly subscribe to the "12 inches or more" FBI penetration guidelines. So while expanding .380 is a little lacking compared to... anything more substantial, really, you'll be just fine with Critical Defense, Gold Dot, or any of the other big names you can find right now.
    But I do agree that CorBon DPX is considered sort of the holy grail of .380 loads. Nothing's perfect, but that's as good as it gets.
     
  4. MedWheeler

    MedWheeler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2008
    Messages:
    5,440
    Location:
    SouthEastern FL
    Nobody can tell you what is the "only stuff that works in your gun." What you find to function well in your gun is what works.

    When I carried a "pocket .380", which was admittedly rare, it was stoked with what I could find that ran in the gun, a Grendel P10. That was (and still is, though the gun is no longer regularly carried) simple Remington-UMC 95-grain FNEB stuff. It's a semi-jacketed flat-nosed lead solid round. Didn't worry me one bit.

    My P32 is loaded with two rounds (first two up) of flat-tipped WWB FMJ stuff, followed by Fiocchi RN-FMJ, the latter being strictly for the prevention of rimlock (which is not a concern for you, as .380 ammo is not subject to rimlock as .32 is.)

    You say you've already started carrying it. With what is it currently loaded, and have you proofed that load?

    Rock what you got, and worry about the "super-trendy-whizz-bang" stuff when you can find, afford, and proof it.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2013
  5. huntsman

    huntsman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,590
    Location:
    ohio's northcoast
    ball ammo, Remington Express
     
  6. mljdeckard

    mljdeckard Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2006
    Messages:
    12,768
    Location:
    In a part of Utah that resembles Tattooine.
    I think Critical Defense is gimmick ammo. I think that it is a solution looking for a problem. And I seriously doubt that any other premium defensive ammo is any more or less likely to fail to expand with clothing than Critical Defense.

    It's a free country, and you can do what you want, but I think that very small guns are not good beginner guns. They are harder to aim and shoot accurately.

    If I carried a .380, (or more likely, someone I know insisted on carrying one against my advice,) I would steer them towards hot loads like thos available from Double-Tap, to try to bridge the gap between .380 and 9mm.

    You do what you want.
     
  7. OilyPablo

    OilyPablo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,082
    Location:
    WA State (NOT in Seattle)
  8. antiquus

    antiquus Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    300
    My LCP eats any FMJ ammo I've fed it, and has never seen a JHP. Currently, it's loaded with Silver Bear FMJ, because it is reliable, steel jacketed and penetrates well.
     
  9. GRIZ22

    GRIZ22 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2006
    Messages:
    5,202
    I use FMJ in 380 for better feeding and penetration. If you feel you need a +P or +P+ get a 9mm parabellum.
     
  10. OptimusPrime

    OptimusPrime Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2012
    Messages:
    573
    Location:
    The Old Dominion
    I load the Mrs. with Golden Saber because it's 102 grains and I'm a fan of bigger=better. It feeds flawlessly in her gun and if it expands, great. If it doesn't expand, it's the same as FMJ.
    Mostly though, it has to feed 100% that's how you'll choose the right ammo for you.
     
  11. 1KPerDay

    1KPerDay Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2006
    Messages:
    13,068
    Location:
    Happy Valley, UT
    If you try buffalo Bore or Cor-bon hot stuff make sure it works in your pistol. That's the only stuff my LCP doesn't run flawlessly.

    I run Speer Gold Dots primarily... or whatever federal premium JHP is available.

    Or Fiocchi FMJ...
     
  12. Certaindeaf

    Certaindeaf member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    5,170
    Location:
    Wet Oregon
    Those BB loads have over thirty inches of penetration. Nothing wrong with that, perhaps.
    Oh, and a FMJ is not a "hard cast".. they are FMJ.
     
  13. History.Doc

    History.Doc Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2012
    Messages:
    131
    Federal works fine in mine also.
     
  14. tuj

    tuj Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2011
    Messages:
    1,983
    Location:
    Houston
  15. orionengnr

    orionengnr Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,434
    When I had an LCP, it was stoked with CorBon DPX.
     
  16. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,334
    Winchester Q4206 FMJ flat nose. The flat nose crushes more tissue than a round nose FMJ.

    [​IMG]
     
  17. wnycollector

    wnycollector Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2006
    Messages:
    3,122
    Location:
    Western NY
    +1 on that. This is what I carry in my LCP.
     
  18. CougarRed

    CougarRed Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    137
    Wilson Combat XTP. Low flash and low recoil. Penetrates 12" and expands some, certainly more than a flat nose.
     
  19. mes228

    mes228 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    317
    .380

    No one thinks a second about carrying hollow points in a .38 special. Why then would they not carry HP's in a .380? There seems to be little difference between the two as far as "numbers" go. I prefer penetration over expansion IF YOU MUST CHOOSE ONLY ONE. Is that the case with the .380? Seems the greater likely hood is that a HP may not expand at .380 velocities.

    If that occurs, you still have the penetration of ball ammo. If the round does expand, I suspect you would still get several inches of penetration. My position on this is "if your mouse gun will reliably run HP's there is no reason not to carry them". In the .380's I've fired (Sig, Ruger, Keltec, North American) I've had almost no problems feeding HP's. Perhaps I'm wrong but I'd carry Remington Golden Saber in the first mag. If the pistol would run it.
     
  20. huntsman

    huntsman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,590
    Location:
    ohio's northcoast
    and what if that's not enough? maybe several inches on a thin human is enough but according to .gov we're becoming an obese nation, 3" of fat first could make your several inches of penetration worthless
     
  21. CougarRed

    CougarRed Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2005
    Messages:
    137
    Actually, it took the ammo industry decades to come up with 38 special load that would penetrate and expand reliably per FBI testing protocols out of a snubnose.

    JHPs out of 380 mousegun barrels usually don't penetrate anywhere close to the 12" minimum if they expand. I've noted the exceptions to the rule elsewhere (XTP, HydraShok). And the reason they are exceptions is because they expand less than average.
     
  22. huntsman

    huntsman Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2003
    Messages:
    3,590
    Location:
    ohio's northcoast
    I've used that ammo for plinking but for carry ammo I have doubts about their QC, it's still just ammo made to a price point.

    I've settled on Remington Express not because it's a magic bullet but because it was the accepted standard target ammo and carried the brand quality that shooters used to demand.
     
  23. mes228

    mes228 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2006
    Messages:
    317
    .380

    There are videos I've seen with the Rem. Gld. Saber in .380 penetrating ballistic gelatin as far as ball ammo does. The point was clogged with the denim they covered the gelatin with. There was no expansion, but plenty of penetration. However, I must admit to not really knowing anything "for sure". I'm just a shooter and a reader. The main point I was making is the perception difference between .38 special and .380 auto. Essentially the same in performance numbers yet I think most would use HP's in a .38 special.
     
  24. Certaindeaf

    Certaindeaf member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    5,170
    Location:
    Wet Oregon
    If you handload and cast, the Lee 105 grain SWC works pretty good. It makes a hole much bigger than itself in/through meat and bone.. from the get go.

    90315-250x250.jpg
     
  25. Shawn Dodson

    Shawn Dodson Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,334
    The most important "number" is sectional density. A 90gr .380 JHP bullet has a sectional density of 0.102. Whereas 110gr .38 Special has a sectional density of 0.123; 125gr has a sectional density of 0.140; and 135gr has a sectional density of 0.153.

    .380 ACP cannot propel a JHP bullet that possesses sufficient sectional density to reliably achieve adequate penetration after the bullet expands.

    If a bullet has to first pass through an arm to penetrate the chest then the bullet can lose as much as 30% of its TOTAL penetration potential. Thus a bullet that normally penetrates 10" may, in this situation, penetrate only 7" TOTAL. If you subtract 3-4 inches just for passing through an arm then you have 3-4 inches penetration potential remaining to reach and damage vitals in the torso.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page