Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Beveling cylinders

Discussion in 'Blackpowder' started by Tinpan58, Apr 25, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Tinpan58

    Tinpan58 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    California
    I have a lot of extra cylinders for my 1858s, And I have been experimenting with them and find some shoot better than others, and some shave a better ring than others, some shave a complete ring and others shave a partial one, so I took one and using a cone shape grinding stone put a little bevel in the top of the chambers, so instead of shaving a ring it compresses the ball into the chamber. I was surprised at the improvement in accuracy, in my 8” remmie it shot a very tight group, it also worked quite well in the 5.5 remmie although the groups wern't quite as tight as in the 8”. It also was nicer on the loading side especially loading on the gun not having all the lead shavings to deal with. I know that beveling a cylinder is nothing new but am interested in what you have to say about doing this, good or bad?
     
  2. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    Good. I do it to all my C&B revolvers, though I call it chamfering. :D
     
  3. Lunie

    Lunie Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    Messages:
    530
    Well what if I wanna cut a radius instead of a chamfer? :neener:
     
  4. Tinpan58

    Tinpan58 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    California
    Thanks junkman I knew, there was a term for it that started with a ch, i’ll have to write that one down.
     
  5. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    It would be a LOT harder to do.
     
  6. Busyhands94

    Busyhands94 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,371
    Location:
    California, the "you can't have it" State.
    I do it to all my BP revolvers. It seems to make them easier to load!
     
  7. Hellgate

    Hellgate Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,440
    Location:
    Orygun
    All the eight Euroarms Remingtons (36 and 44 cals) I have had are/were well chamfered, maybe 1/10 of an inch.
     
  8. Berkley

    Berkley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Sam Colt claimed that chamfering the chambers eliminated chain-fires:

    2mcsfub.jpg
    -"On the Application of Machinery to the manufacture of Rotating Chambered-Breech Firearms and Their Peculiarities" by Colonel Samuel Colt; Excerpt Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 1855.
    Although he used the term "chamfer", he also called it a "bevil" - typically for him, his spelling was a little idiosyncratic.:)
     
  9. oldcodger

    oldcodger Member

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2012
    Messages:
    57
    bevel vs. chamfer

    If my memory serves me (from four years of high school
    industrial arts) - and it may not;

    my own recollection, NOT from any other source:

    Bevel - angled cut between and adjoining two surfaces which are 90 degrees (plus or minus) apart--i.e., as above, said surfaces being the cylinder face and chamber wall

    Chamfer- angled cut between and adjoining two parallel (or approximately parallel) surfaces-- i.e., the sharpened edge of a wood chisel

    I hope this clarifies, rather than just making me look like a know-it-all. I ain't, and don't. :D

    oc
     
  10. chicharrones
    • Contributing Member

    chicharrones needs more ammo

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Galveston Bay is an Hour Away ©
    Thanks for the post, Berkley. :cool:
     
  11. arcticap

    arcticap Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,185
    Location:
    Central Connecticut
    There was a thread discussing whether the "exaggerated" beveling in the illustration, or other chamfering was ever used in any of the Colt designs, or ever used on a regular basis or on which models and when.
    There's more details about it on page 2, as well as about some of the pluses and minuses of chamfering.

    http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=583952&highlight=bevel
     
    Last edited: Apr 26, 2012
  12. Berkley

    Berkley Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    Interesting thread. Since I don't have any original Colts, I can't comment on whether or to what extent the chamber mouths were in fact chamfered. Later in the same publication, in response to a question, Colt certainly claimed that it was done.

    3465pwl.jpg
     
  13. Noz

    Noz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2010
    Messages:
    801
    Location:
    Southwest Missouri
    I have an 1862 produced Colt 1851 that has chamfered chambers.

    The easiest way to do this is with a case mouth beveling tool, Lee makes a very inexpensive one. 4 or 5 turns in each chamber mouth and you are done. It is most noticable in allowing much easier loading.

    All of my 1860s are chamfered. Seven shootable at the moment.
     
  14. arcticap

    arcticap Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2005
    Messages:
    6,185
    Location:
    Central Connecticut
    Are the Ruger Old Army chambers chamfered, or chamfered
    so much to not be able to cut rings off the balls?
    If they aren't chamfered at the factory then I wouldn't do it. :)

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Apr 27, 2012
  15. fdf

    fdf Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    176
    Why do folks modify, bevel or chamfer, cylinders? Your warranty is gone by doing so.

    If there was such an advantage, why does the manufacturer not do do?????

    Are folks smarter than the engineers who design safe products???
     
  16. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    Sometimes.
     
  17. kwhi43@kc.rr.com

    kwhi43@kc.rr.com Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,153
    This is how mine look on my custom target revolver. I think that you shoud
    not shave a ring of lead when you seat the ball. You will get much better
    accuracy if the ball is swegged in.
    ThePerfectOneCylinder.jpg
     
  18. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    ....and here is what my Colt types look like.

    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

  19. fdf

    fdf Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2012
    Messages:
    176
    Would any of the Masters from Friendship or Phonenix like to comment on accuracy methods to improve revolvers and this discussion, we might all learn something.
     
  20. Busyhands94

    Busyhands94 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2011
    Messages:
    2,371
    Location:
    California, the "you can't have it" State.
    Not to mention if it shaves a ring you might lose a couple grains, even a precisely weighed ball would be useless if you end up cutting two grains off one, three off another, etc. and I would assume a professional like yourself would want them to all weigh exactly the same. And of course each chamber might do it slightly different, so it would (at least in theory) improve consistency on the ball going into the chamber.

    Any thoughts on this?
     
  21. chicharrones
    • Contributing Member

    chicharrones needs more ammo

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2010
    Messages:
    4,628
    Location:
    Galveston Bay is an Hour Away ©
    Manufacturers in many cases will not add a cost increasing step in their firearms meant for general use. If a manufacturer has a custom shop, they can do additional modifications for extra money that many "shade tree gunsmiths" can easily do themselves.

    As far as any warranty is concerned, after I've fired a firearm enough times to prove it works as issued by the factory I don't mind taking some risk upon myself by altering trigger pull, chamfered cylinder bores, etc.

    Not all warranties last indefinitely anyway. :cool:
     
  22. kBob

    kBob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,444
    Location:
    North Central Florida
    SO from this thread and the referenced one we know that chamfering may allow easier seating of the ball with the rammer, it might make such harder, it makes a revolver more accurate, it ruins accuracy, it must be done with precission tools and a Lee Case trimmer by hand works fine. It might also increase the incidence of chainfire while lessing the chance of chain fire. A skilled machinist has told us to not do this and a skilled machinist has told us to go ahead.

    Man I love the web and the infernal net!

    My guess is that it's whatever blows your skirts up.

    WHen I was shooting three position rimfire I noted that scores improved when what folks THOGHT should work for them was tried and mysteriously when someone who did not believe such a change would be useful tried it it was not. This in reference only to accuracy. I believe that for most of us shooter skill and CONFIDENCE are the keys to accuracy more than the little tweeks we try. As far as accuracy goes I wonder if the difference between sharp chamber mouths and chamfered ones might not be how the shooter feels about them.

    As to mechanical advantages in ramming force, that would seem to be straight forward as to measuring it. It is either harder or easier.....ecept it may be dependednt on ball hardness, how over sized the ball is, the angle of the chamfer, the qualities of the steel, how smooth the chamfer is, the prescence or abscence of some sort of lub, and local weather conditions.

    DOes it cause or prevent chain fires? Is that with over ball soft lube or bare ball? Is that with wonder wad or equivilant or ball on powder? Is that with filler or with out? and in combinations? Is it an increase of 1 more chainfires per 2000 shots or a decrease of 1 less in 2000 shots?

    I am interested in these discussions but sometimes it seems to come down to modifying Master Yoda's advice and "Do or Do not but for the Force's sake don't depend on the infernal net!"

    -kBob
     
  23. junkman_01

    junkman_01 member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,728
    Location:
    Florida
    kBob,

    I'm SURE your keen insight was enjoyed by all! :what:
     
  24. Tinpan58

    Tinpan58 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2011
    Messages:
    145
    Location:
    California
    Thanks every one for the great response I am currently in tombstone AZ for a few days and y ft didn't work hear great place got hear Thursday be home Sunday using phone to type. This Big pain thanks again
     
  25. kwhi43@kc.rr.com

    kwhi43@kc.rr.com Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2008
    Messages:
    2,153
    The guy who built my revolver does it for a living. He puts a bevel on it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page