Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by josiewales, Sep 17, 2013.
Posted from Thehighroad.org App for Android
Anti-gun media and government rulers appear content to keep it that way unless they can show without doubt that the sorts of guns they're focused on banning were used.
passed a background check. When we hear talk of bans on these evil semiautomatic weapons, we can point out that this guy had a pump shotgun, which is pretty close to what Biden recommends gun owners buy.
Increasing their lethal nature from what? That's what shot shells have in them, geniuses.
Guess if you can't call it a military style assault weapon the next best thing is to call it law enforcement style, as if this is something that is not supposed to be in civilian hands. Nevermind that it's one of the most popular shotguns on the market.
FAT MAN BOMB by scarfam, on Flickr
That's what they will be going for, taking more guns out of civilian hands.
A takedown 870? That would be pretty cool, but ummm.... huh?
Perhaps they just mean a folding stock?
Good observation. Do you see any parallels between that and the Newtown shooter? His evil black AR15 rifle of mass destruction was perfectly legal even under Connecticut’s distorted assault gun ban. That kernel of factual information was and is ignored by the people with an agenda.
Just take the barrel off...takes three seconds to put it back on...and reduces the overall length to just that of the barrel.
Thanks...I'm adding that to my arsenal of facts...
I love bugs bunny myself
Yep. The 870 is clearly shown under the AR-15 description.
It is my firm belief that journalists have this taped up beside their computers.
How many must die in gun free zones before we learn?
EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban
.. can you even buy an AR15 in Washington DC ?
I understand that most of these people would not know the difference between a Purdy and an SKS, but why would anyone allow their name to be associated with such blatantly WRONG info put out as fact? You put your stamp on that statement, Jennifer...you own it forever. I was glad this morning to hear Bill Hemmer going off about the non-existent AR that had been reported so widely as fact, though. Seems to me that Fox, among the others, needs an on staff or contract 'expert' to handle these kinds of facts when things like this occur. Maybe a high profile type like Colin Noir or Cody Donaldson who come across well to the general uninformed public. I see a huge opportunity here with upside in several directions.
I remember as a very small kid watching a documentary called "The Guns of Autumn" with my father....narrated by none other than an up and coming Dan Rather. My dad was a WW2 vet who had seen quite a bit of the downside of humanity and rarely let himself get animated. I will never remember his quiet anger as he explained to me what was going on, and how I would fight this battle all of my life if I chose to pursue firearms as a hobby. As things turned out, I made a living for 30 years with them, but I have never given so much as a single moments credence to any statement that came out of Dan Rathers mouth from that evening on. Jennifer, you are in that category now. Enjoy the company!
Any gun ban talk that comes from this, we need to strongly point out that:
-Loon used a Biden-approved gun
-Loon passed a background check
Lots of innocent people still died.
Separate names with a comma.