Bloomberg in the Wall Street Journal

Status
Not open for further replies.

3KillerBs

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2008
Messages
993
Location
NC Sandhills
Bloomberg is blathering about "reasonable restrictions" in the Wall Street Journal today: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121478283640414407.html?mod=opinion_main_commentaries

My response:
Mayor Bloomberg is being disingenuous. There is no “middle ground” on guns to be found. His “reasonable restrictions” are nothing but an attempt to get the camel’s nose back under the tent.

Keeping criminals from getting and using guns is impossible. Even the most repressive of police states can’t achieve that despite draconian laws and Stalinesque police powers. Criminals ignore laws. That’s what makes them criminals.

There is no “gun-show loophole”. The same rules apply to all private sales regardless of whether they take place in the parking lot of a gun show between strangers or in the dining room of a family home where a grandmother sells her purse gun to her adult granddaughter before entering a nursing home.

Guns in the hands of honest, law-abiding citizens decrease crime, not increase it. “Gun control” laws are nothing but an empty, feel-good smokescreen to distract people from the real issue of solving crimes and punishing criminals. If Mayor Bloomberg actually wanted to reduce crime he’d end the catch-and-release-policing that puts offenders right back on the street without having seriously inconvenienced them, much less punished them.

If he wanted to chop crime to the lowest practical levels permitted by human nature he’d put time and money equivalent to all he’s put into his “gun control” efforts into providing a gun and a firearms safety course to every sane, adult, non-felon in his city. It wouldn’t be all that expensive – widely-used models such as the Taurus 85 revolver in .38special and the Bersa Thunder semi-auto in .380 are available new for $300 or less and many NRA instructors would undoubtedly be willing to spend some time volunteering in NYC if their expenses were paid. It's likely that wealthy donors concerned about reducing crime would assist with the funding too.

Instead of imagining a world without guns try imagining a world without helpless victims.

Lets put a lot of letters into the Wall Street Journal's inbox this morning letting Mayor Bloomberg know that his elitist group of "mayors across the country" don't get to rule from on high.
 
This isn't a discussion forum on what the article did or didn't say. Open another thread in General if you want to discuss what was said in the article.
 
Apologies to the OP for the hijack. I didn't think a duplicate topic would be appropriate, but the mods disagree.

I moved my question to a new post at here
 
Given that they think "we can all agree," I believed myself duty-bound to provide appropriate and unambiguous feedback. Therefore, I posted to the WSJ forum and e-mailed to messrs. Bloomberg and Menino the following simple message:

I do not agree.

Regards,
Kenneth David Hall
Fairview Park, Ohio
 
Here's what I posted there ...

The largest flaw in the thinking of those who support gun control laws is that they believe you can legislate human behavior for the entire population under their control You cannot. Law abiding citizens represent about 90% of any given population or more. The other 10% are criminals who live outside societal and legal rules. So their behavior will not be dictated by gun control laws. Therefore gun control only increases the likelihood of criminal success because the other 90% of the population is unarmed or less likely to be armed.

So Mayor Bloomberg, what part of this series of steps didn't you understand or choose not to believe? The rest of the country has liberalized their arcane gun control laws and seen crime decrease. Can you learn from this? I sure hope you do someday or you will be passed off in history as another politician who "didn't get it"...
 
The "fire sale" he is referring to is when the BATFE shuts down a gun shop/seller/dealer.

Bloomberg would have you believe that after the BATFE has shut him down for illegal sales or procedures, and pulled his FFL license, they would then allow him to take the remaining arms in inventory to a flea market and sell them to anyone that comes along.

"terror gap" is a new liberal term, that I don't quite understand either. But it has the words terror (emotional play), and gap, which would indicate something is missing.

But his statement, "If the federal government can prevent a potentially dangerous person from getting on a plane....", is ridiculous. The Federal government can't stop a potentially dangerous individual from getting on a plane. Too many non-metallic items can be used as weapons, carried in the pocket and never detected. They can't keep drugs and weapons out of Federal prisons, you'd have to be pretty naive to think they can keep them out of planes and off the streets.
 
You could substitue Mayor Nutter of Philly and Mayor Daley of Chicago for Bloomberg in that article. The ignore this common sense in order to pander to a large minority constituency who has been brain washed into not "snitching" on the criminals in their neigborhoods. They don't want them in jail, so these Mayors persist in the catch and release nonsense.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top