Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Bogus-gun use rises in real crime in D.C.

Discussion in 'Legal' started by RealGun, Feb 11, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    Bogus-gun use rises in real crime in D.C.

    By Amy Doolittle
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES
    February 11, 2006

    D.C. police and city officials want to stiffen the penalties for offenders who use BB, pellet and air guns as weapons.

    Such "guns look very real, the weight is real, they have removable clips," Metropolitan Police Chief Charles H. Ramsey said. "If an individual uses them to commit a crime, they should be treated as if they are using a real gun."

    Under current law, if an offender discharges a BB, pellet or toy gun in the District while committing a crime, that person is charged only with the crime committed. If a person discharges a firearm during a crime, he or she also is charged with a weapons violation.

    Persons convicted of owning or carrying a handgun in the District face a maximum of five years in prison.

    There is no penalty for owning or carrying a BB gun, air gun or toy. It is illegal for people under 18 to own a BB gun in the District.

    http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20060210-110721-4118r
     
  2. Manedwolf

    Manedwolf member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2005
    Messages:
    3,693
    Location:
    New Hampshire

    So what happens if someone points a fake but real-looking gun at you, and you shoot them?

    What're the legal precedents for that, in various areas?
     
  3. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Much depends on your state law. In most states, if it looks like a real gun, you're justified in shooting the criminals wielding it during a robbery, et cetera. In Washington, D.C. or Chicago, you'd be arrested and charged with having a firearm.
     
  4. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    Yeah, there is a "reasonable belief" test. Assuming that self defense against threats to life is allowed, self defense against conduct that appears to be such a threat is also allowed.

    None of this would be a problem if non-criminals in DC had real guns to defend themselves with.
     
  5. carebear

    carebear Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,373
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    This is kinda backwards.

    Rightly enough, if you use a fake or real gun in a robbery you are charged with armed robbery because the victim can't know the difference.

    If you discharge the real gun in the course of the crime (proving it to be a real firearm to the victim) you are also charged with discharging a weapon in the commission of a crime.

    Now they want to make discharging the FAKE weapon (thus proving it to NOT be a real firearm to the victim) in the course of the crime have the same penalty.

    :confused:

    In any event, does armed robbery not carry a heavy enough sentence that we have to bother with discharge violations?
     
  6. Crosshair

    Crosshair Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,985
    Location:
    Grand Forks, North Dakota
    :neener:
     
  7. gc70

    gc70 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    3,030
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Excuse my ignorance, but how do you discharge a fake gun?
     
  8. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    No, the problem is that people can legally walk around with pellet guns and if they rob someone, the robbing is the crime rather than the pellet gun possession.

    Put another way, if a cop walks up to you and tries to arrest you for shooting a pellet gun at pigeons, you can currently tell him to piss off. This law aims to change that.
     
  9. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    7,308
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    I see this as taking "deadly" out of "deadly weapon".

    There is a separate firearms violation charge, possibly the only charge prosecuted. This law proposal would allow the possession of "looks like a deadly weapon" to be treated as a felony in its own right.

    I suppose that if you shot someone weilding such a "weapon", and use of the "weapon" was not illegal, you could be sued by the punk's mom.

    Rather than get lost in the trees with this concept, I go back to an objection to being prosecuted merely for possession, demonizing the gun. I think it should be an entirely different matter if a gun is actually used while committing a crime. If it isn't a "deadly" weapon, what are we really trying to accomplish here? It seems to me that "pretending to have a deadly weapon" is now a felony. It figures that it would come out of DC.
     
  10. Fastlane

    Fastlane Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    329
    Location:
    Ohio
    It will be just another excuse for D.C. to justify continuing their gun ban.
     
  11. silliman89

    silliman89 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Messages:
    283
    Location:
    Virginia
    But if this law saves just one pigeon... It's for the baby pigeons!
     
  12. carebear

    carebear Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    4,373
    Location:
    Anchorage, AK
    If I was shooting a pellet gun at pigeons in DC and a cop saw me with the thing I'm pretty sure I'd be telling the cop to "piss off" while I'm proned out at gunpoint. :D
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page