Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Boycott San Diego County Fair!

Discussion in 'Legal' started by jnojr, Jun 1, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jnojr

    jnojr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,095
    Location:
    Reston, VA
  2. No_Brakes23

    No_Brakes23 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,604
    Location:
    Everett, WA Recently escaped from San Diego, PRK
    Living in a state where the LEOs get to enjoy more of their constitutional rights than I do mine, I could give a hoot about the Del Mar fair. In fact, good on 'em for evening it up a little bit.

    Oh and by the way, they are doing this at the behest of the San Diego Sheriff's Office, you left that little bit out. (Even if the SDSD wants to waffle about their opinion on the matter.)

    Now ask me next year, when I might be an LEO, and I bet I will have a different perspective on this issue, but as one of the untermensch right now, it is just fine by me.
     
  3. answerguy

    answerguy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    881
    Location:
    Bay City Michigan
    Couldn't we just boycott San Diego?
     
  4. No_Brakes23

    No_Brakes23 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,604
    Location:
    Everett, WA Recently escaped from San Diego, PRK
    Har har. How is this a useful contribution to the discussion?

    San Diego has about 14 military installations and loads of former servicemembers, making it one of the least "blue" of all the metro areas in CA.

    Assembleyman LaSuer and Congressman Cunningham are both representing San Diego CA, and trying to reverse the retarded firearms laws we have now. Seeing as how Cali is one of the front lines in the RKBA battle, ditchin SD would hurt the cause, not help it.
     
  5. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe Member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,700
    Location:
    SW Ohio
    Why just San Diego? Boycott the entire RPK!
     
  6. 10shooter

    10shooter Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    71
    Location:
    Dallas/FortWorth
    Silly question but is this decision legally binding. In my state Texas they can post this all they want but the penal code exempts LEO in nearly all clauses. If they say no Mr. policeman you can't bring that in here then its possible occupational discrimination.
     
  7. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    I'm sure I'll always miss the beaches and temperate climate.
     
  8. jefnvk

    jefnvk Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2004
    Messages:
    4,938
    Location:
    The Copper Country, Michigan
    For holding off duty LEO to the same standard as other people? I don't think so. If anything, they get an attaboy.
     
  9. 38SnubFan

    38SnubFan Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2004
    Messages:
    451
    Location:
    Harrisburg, PA
    With the new Federal law allowing all current and retired LEOs to carry concealed, I don't see how this can be legal.

    Then again, CA has been known to push the envelope of "illegal" by their retarded and overzealous gun control laws for years.

    I sincerely hope there's a reversal in this decision, or that the boycott is HUGE!

    -38SnubFan
     
  10. peacefuljeffrey

    peacefuljeffrey member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Messages:
    546
    Location:
    West Palm Beach, FL
    You say something like this:

    ...and then you challenge the value of someone else's contribution to the discussion?

    Isn't it true that you are saying that you're irritated by the fact that LEOs enjoy greater self defense rights (i.e. gun carry) than the rest of us, but that it won't bother you that we "untermensch" still don't have full exercise of our rights once YOU become one of the "ubermensch"?

    So, as long as you are one of the elite, the struggle of the underclass won't bother you, is that what you're admitting is likely to happen if/when you become LEO? :rolleyes:

    And people wonder why so many here take a dim view of law enforcement personnel.


    -Jeffrey
     
  11. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,562
    Location:
    Forestburg, Texas
    How is this useful? It sort of illustrates the ludicrous futility of boycotting as is often the case. You won't be making any great political victories when your opposition isn't a government agency or other agency that can effect a change in the law. In other words

    HB218 does not supercede state laws pertaining to carriage on state and local government property or to private property.
    http://www.grandlodgefop.org/legislation/issues/hr218faq.pdf

    As for Texas law exempting LEOs, what is the specific penal code? I don't recall ever reading it. I figure it might be inisghtful.

    In regard to occupational discrimination if cops were not allowed to carry off duty into certain places, that is no occupational discrimination. The cops are allowed to go in those places, just not with a gun. Since unarmed officers would be allowed in, then it isn't discrimination against their occupation.

    http://www.grandlodgefop.org/legislation/issues/hr218faq.pdf

    Following a different lead, the concept of occupational discrimination does not pertain to discriminating against folks who work for entities different from the one supposedly doing the discriminating. The cops are not the employees of the county fair and they are not being trying to gain employment within the fair or trying to rise to a higher level within the county fair business hierarchy.
     
  12. artherd

    artherd member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,518
    Location:
    An Elevated Position in the Bay Area, PRK
    Sigh, wouldn't have belived it if I hadn't seen it in print. JTFC.


    On another note:

    Aircraft? Hrm???
     
  13. No_Brakes23

    No_Brakes23 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    1,604
    Location:
    Everett, WA Recently escaped from San Diego, PRK
    Not what I said or meant at all.

    To clarify, if I was an LEO, I would be apalled that they want to deny me the right to do what I can do elsewhere,

    but,

    as a resident of a state where civilians are not allowed to CCW, I am not going to go to bat for someone else's right that I don't even posess.

    I am certain that as an LEO, plenty of things that I can do but my friends cannot will bother me. But I am certainly not going to NOT carry out of some kind of protest for the unfairness to others. That would be irresponsible to my family.

    Ya know, taking the actions or opinions of someone who is NOT yet a cop, (Like me,) and then letting that form your opinion of LEOs is intellectually lazy. Ignoring for a minute that you put words into my mouth, I am hardly represntative of LEOs as a whole.

    There are far deeper issues that cause the dim view of LEOs.
     
  14. mitchshrader

    mitchshrader Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    56
    Population Pressure?

    Let us admit that the thickness of the crowd MIGHT affect what's sensible? I've been in state fairs, and a thoughtless person with a package of firecrackers isn't unthinkable.

    Were I carrying in a large crowd, and suddenly heard loud noises and screams, my actions thereafter wouldn't necessarily be entirely safe (for members of that crowd)..
    mistakes do get made, and i'm not immune from them.

    And I'm careful, mature, have a bit of training, and don't drink ..

    Some more impulsive sort, with perhaps a beer or two aboard and scant life experience would arguably be even less safe.

    While I can see the idea as an insult to off duty officers, BY GOD I'd rather be insulted than interred.

    Considering the circumstances, ANY carrying might NOT be the safer alternative, from the event promoters perspective.

    Now, in all fairness, were I involved in said decision, I'd try to explain myself very clearly, and quite possibly offer discount tickets, and not weasel about it.. how the policy was formed isn't clear, nor who formed it, and it would cost little to try to mitigate perceived insult.

    If the fair has gone so far as to install metal detectors, then at least Someone thinks there's a real danger .. While that might be a strong arguement for extra security, and MORE official presence, I can certainly understand the idea that anyone (not in uniform) seen with a firearm would be presumed dangerous.

    Reflexive assertion of ''rights'' should be tempered with deliberate effort to see not only 'the other side' but 'the big picture'. Sez me..
     
  15. jnojr

    jnojr Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,095
    Location:
    Reston, VA
    If they can get away with keeping active LEOs from carrying, what do you suppose the chances of a "peon" with a CCW ever being able to carry?

    This is a stupid decision, and needs to be changed.

    I'm in the hiring process right now, and could take the same attitude. But wrong is wrong. And stupid is stupid.
     
  16. riverdog

    riverdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,826
    Living in San Diego I could care less about the Del Mar Fair, didn't go last year or the year before and I won't attend this year. BTW, Roger Hedgecock (previously a SD mayor and currently a conservative radio host) has a CA CCW and he can't carry at the Fair either -- he's pissed. It's not just off duty LEO's, it's all CCW. The guy running the Fair who made this decision is an idiot IMO.

    That said, regardless of their policy on CCW, I won't be attending so this is one boycott I can support without hesitation.
     
  17. NavyDoc

    NavyDoc Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    126
    "Har har. How is this a useful contribution to the discussion?

    San Diego has about 14 military installations and loads of former servicemembers, making it one of the least "blue" of all the metro areas in CA.

    Assembleyman LaSuer and Congressman Cunningham are both representing San Diego CA, and trying to reverse the retarded firearms laws we have now. Seeing as how Cali is one of the front lines in the RKBA battle, ditchin SD would hurt the cause, not help it."


    All that military in the area. All on the front line of the WOT, and not a single one can CCW.....
    I'm sorry, but I can't support someone considered "superior" to myself.
     
  18. O.F.Fascist

    O.F.Fascist Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    262
    Location:
    Corpus Christi, Tx, United States of America
    I'm not in California and as such I have no plans to to visit the fair, consider me boycotting it. :D
     
  19. 10shooter

    10shooter Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    71
    Location:
    Dallas/FortWorth
    Double Naught Spy Section 30.06 of the Texas penal code is in referance to carry conceal permit holders not peace officers on the do's and don'ts of trespass notices and do not carry in here postings. No carry signs in Texas do not effect peace officers. Many agencies and states require a peace officer on or off duty to respond to a felony or breach of the peace committed in their view. This is why some agencies consider their officers kind of on duty at all times. Unarmed in the presence of a violent felony being committed may make me just a good witness to not a stopper of.
    On occupational discrimination when you say no carry conceal but are referencing a bit of the penal code covering carry conceal holders and not peace officers then say well for us that means you.
    The question is in California does the laws covering off duty carry by officers give city/counties or other entities the ability to bar officer carry.
    Sure my county could pass a rule barring all minorities from walking outside at night but it couldn't be enforced, because its not legal.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page