Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Breaking news: ATF bans importation of parts kits with intact barrels

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Gun Wielding Maniac, Jul 1, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Gun Wielding Maniac

    Gun Wielding Maniac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    Most of you probably will not care about this announcement, but word has been breaking all over the net and I have done some investigation on my own. Yesterday, the ATF called up all the importers of parts kits in the US and informed them that they had ruled not to approve the importation of any more parts kits of non-sporting firearms, such as the AK, FAL, or G3 rifles, with intact barrels. This means that any barrels included with these kits will have to be torch cut in the same way as the receivers are. The ruling takes effect immediately.
    :fire:
    I called up Lois at Centerfire Systems to find out if it was true. It is. Centerfire Systems had a load of AMD-63 AK parts kits coming in next month. Since they heard of this hearing, the order has been cancelled. If the parts kits are not already in the country, they never will be allowed in... at least with intact barrels.

    This will force home builders and manufacturers such as Century and Global Trades to have new US barrels made. This will of course, cause the cost and difficulty of any build to increase. No word yet on how this will effect the WASR rifles or SAIGA guns which are imported built with foreign receiver and barrels.

    If you are in any way interested in building your own semi-auto clone of any "assault weapon" you need to start thinking of it soon. The prices will surely get jacked up overnight.
     
  2. KaceCoyote

    KaceCoyote Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,471
    Location:
    St.Louis Missouri
    It kills me the ATF can do this without public consent.


    Still, I cant help but feel the "fold yourself" receivers somehow contributed to this.
     
  3. MudPuppy

    MudPuppy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,529
    Location:
    UK and Texas
    Link?

    What next??? I can't believe we won the cold war but have lost the peace.
     
  4. Pinned&Recessed

    Pinned&Recessed Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    214
    Location:
    Hicks Airfield, TX
    How's that?

    What's got the ATF so pissy about imported barrels? Why not just import the barrels seperately?

    I agree that the ATF making it's own rules outside public consent is wrong. See their recent decisions regarding SBR Form 1s.
     
  5. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    This kind of thing is enough to make one forget about any firearms laws.


    Why bother regulating barrels when even convicts in ultramax prisons can make working firearms, when they're being WATCHED carefully?? It boggles the mind.
     
  6. KaceCoyote

    KaceCoyote Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,471
    Location:
    St.Louis Missouri
    Well first I'm under the impression that mating a barrel to a gas block is a very difficult excersise.


    Only the AK can bost a "build it yourself" receiver for the common man, then add a parts kit and bam. Quite easily, you have an entire rifle thats "off the books". They cant stop folks from buying a flat sheet of metal with holes punched it in, and its easily produced by anyone with a drillpress anywho. So they throw the brakes on what they can.
     
  7. epijunkie67

    epijunkie67 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    690
    Location:
    East TN
    Link?
     
  8. countertop

    countertop Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,640
    Location:
    At the diner
    All over the net???

    Thats funny. I haven't seen it anywhere but here, least of all on the ATF page.
     
  9. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    epijunkie67 - the book "Zips, Pipes, and Pens" is a good place to start. I'm sure there are other sources as well.


    My personal favorite example was a fully automatic SMG, suppressed. Used in a breakout attempt.
     
  10. Gun Wielding Maniac

    Gun Wielding Maniac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    .

    You havent been looking very hard. Check Gunco, FALfiles, AK-47.net, AR-15.com... The ATF hasnt updated their site yet. No surprise there, as this would apply to importers only anyway.

    Called up the ATF Firearms and Explosives Import branch in Washington, DC. The secretary said she didnt have any knowledge of any ban on parts kits... but that they didnt have a full staff there anyway. She said call back tuesday when the branch chief comes back in. So, I can't get strong confirmation either way from an "Official" source till then. Personally, I believe it is true.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2005
  11. Henry Bowman

    Henry Bowman Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    6,717
    Location:
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    :fire: It burns me that the ATF views us as their enemy. I wish they were more like the Ag extension office that you could call up for advice when you were having trouble using or building you guns.
     
  12. countertop

    countertop Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,640
    Location:
    At the diner
    Eeer, I wouldn't trust the rumourer mill of gun boards


    Why?? How else would people know about this??

    I'll tell you what makes this super suspect, your original line

    Sorry, but the ATF doesn't simply call people up. Thats not the way the system works. This decision, if it were to be made, would most likely be open to notice and comment rulemaking inwhich the ATF announced their intention to change existing import rules and the public would have the opportunity to provide comment on those rules. I can't find evidence of that rule making beingundertaking.

    While it is true, that they may being to simple deny import requests - they would need to issue a very specific letter ruling to the effect and explaining why the situation changed and what was SOP yesterday is no longer SOP today. Further, the decision would not be in effect immediatly, but would have some period of time before it went into effect (so as to provide sufficient notice for importers to comply with a new rule).

    As the poster on AR-15.net said - this is nothing more than the hogwash that some (sadly, alot) of firearms dealers routinly spread so that they can justify otherwise outrageous pricing.

    Caveat emptor - buyer beware.
     
  13. spacemanspiff

    spacemanspiff Senior Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,067
    Location:
    alaska
    ATF was quick to post a memo to their website on 9/13 regarding the sunset of the AWB.
     
  14. Gun Wielding Maniac

    Gun Wielding Maniac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    .

    But the expiration of the AWB had more to do with individuals then this does. The AWB also covered the possession of high-capacity magazines. This strictly deals with legal importation.

    The fact of the matter is that we don't know how long this has been in the works or to what extent anyone had any input into the ATF's regulatory process. This has to do with the approval of new parts kits entry into the USA.

    Hey, believe what you want. Regardless of whether this is true or false, parts kits WILL be jacked up in price in short order.

    Here are a few of the people who would be lying. Remember it well:
    Centerfire Systems
    Akron Armory
    Global Military Gunsmithing
    Global Trades
    Century International Arms
     
  15. Third_Rail

    Third_Rail Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2004
    Messages:
    4,981
    This really does make me so happy that I'm going into machining for a living.
     
  16. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,213
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    I have seen darts, dartguns, homemade knives,(shanks), fece grenades, "cocktails" of every bodily fluid, but never have I ever seen a manufactured firearm in a supermax prison. It happened in "Carbine Williams", is that what you refer to? That actually did happen.
     
  17. countertop

    countertop Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,640
    Location:
    At the diner
    Well, I just spoke with the General Counsel's office (I won't divulge who I spoke with, but if you PM me and I know you I might) and they said "there are no new bans as of today." As his secretary told me as I was waiting for him to get back to his desk (he's an acquaintence, hence he took my call after 4:00 on the Friday before July 4th weekend) "sounds like there is another crazy internet rumor ".

    Anyway, there is no new ban on anything from the ATF - if they were to ban something it would come in one of two forms - either a new regulation (open to notice and comment rulemaking) or a written interpretation from main Justice based upon existing law which would first be published by DOJ (in a very public form) and then reacted to by BATF (again in a very public written manner). Of course, neither the DOJ action nor the BATF reaction would have an impact on parts already here nor would they be necessarily the law of the land as they are only interpretations of current law - but to the extent BATF no longer approves imports - you couldn't go ahead and do it.

    In no instance would they EVER have agents just "calling up" dealers and importers.

    Bottom line, as I said - its a big fat internet scare.

    As for your list of "reputable" firearms dealers - well, this is a public forum so I'll leave my thoughts about them to myself.
     
  18. Gun Wielding Maniac

    Gun Wielding Maniac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    At this point, I'm waiting till I talk to someone in the office of the ATF who might actually know what the hell is going on before I say anything else. That will be Tuesday.

    As I mentioned earlier, I also called the ATF but was only able to speak to a secretary. Looking at the frantic reaction of the importers... ALL of them, I wouldn't be so quick to decry this an "internet myth". You may come too on Tuesday or Wednesday only to find the parts kits running 400 or 500 dollars for what is 200 this week.

    Of course, you may have no interest at all in building up a non-sporting firearm (whatever the heck that really means anyway), in which case this doesnt matter to you.
     
  19. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Apt comparison.

    I'd say it's time for us, the people, to pull the plug on the B.A.T.F.E.
     
  20. countertop

    countertop Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,640
    Location:
    At the diner
    Eeer, did you ever hear anything different?
     
  21. TMM

    TMM Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,049
    does this really have any logical reasoning behind it except for the anti's dream of "gun control today, total control tomorrow"?

    oh wait, an overseas barrel is OBVIOUSLY an assauly weapon while an american made barrel will CLEARLY prevent full-auto fire and be nice and docile.

    ~TMM
    ...idiots
     
  22. Kharn

    Kharn Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,999
    Location:
    Maryland
    Isnt there another topic on this already? Here's a FALFiles post on the subject:
    FALFiles source
    Sounds like people are starting rumors while the ATF moves shop from DC to WV. :rolleyes:

    Kharn
     
  23. hifi

    hifi member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    318
    Government agencies will always try to justify their existence and expand their power. Why do things like this ever surprise anyone?
     
  24. Gun Wielding Maniac

    Gun Wielding Maniac Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2004
    Messages:
    466
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    "Sounds like people are starting rumors while the ATF moves shop from DC to WV. "

    Not so fast. I called the ATF office and they didnt know what the hell is going on. Of course, they rarely do. Here is something posted on Gunco.net recently.

    "Weaponeer provided proof on one of the other threads that the barrel ban is true. I asked them to start a fresh thread.

    http://www.gunco.net/forums/showpos...28&postcount=48

    Not wanting to steal their thunder, I waited a few minutes before starting this thread.

    The detractors are correct; the scan of the memo on Weaponeer's website is illegible, so my thread here is just a quote of their thread. I have not seen the actual memo.

    They quoted the text of a fax they received from DOJ:

    http://www.weaponeer.net/forum/foru...1996&PN=0&TPN=3

    And here I'm quoting it:

    "I cannot post a legible copy of the fax because it's marked CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT from the DOJ, and posting a confidential memorandum from the DOJ is [not] legal.

    I'll tell you what the fax states:
    Dated: June 30, 2005
    URGENT NOTIFICATION BY FACSIMILE
    MEMORANDUM: IMPORT CLIENTS

    SUBJECT: ATF Processing of FORM 6 & Permit Applications for Non-Sporting Barrels and Receivers.
    We are advised that ATF has suspended the processing of ALL Form 6 permit applications for Non-Sporting Barrels and Receivers for commercial resale. If you need to import pther gun parts, please call us for guidance. We will provide further informatin as soon as we receive it."

    This subject is very important."

    Many people with a lot of weight in the industry have confirmed that this is true. The ATF has NOT come outright saying this wasnt real. I've just gotten stammering responses from ATF secretaries.

    As far as I am concerned, the subject is still on the table.
     
  25. HKrazy

    HKrazy Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2004
    Messages:
    101
    Location:
    USA
    18 USC 925(d)(3):

    (d) The Secretary shall authorize a firearm or ammunition to be
    imported or brought into the United States or any possession thereof if
    the firearm or ammunition--

    (3) is of a type that does not fall within the definition of a
    firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue Code
    of 1986 and is generally recognized as particularly suitable for or
    readily adaptable to sporting purposes, excluding surplus military
    firearms, except in any case where the Secretary has not authorized
    the importation of the firearm pursuant to this paragraph, it shall
    be unlawful to import any frame, receiver, or barrel of such firearm
    which would be prohibited if assembled.


    18 USC 925


    The BATF was allowing an exception to the law by letting these parts in for "repair or replacement" only.

    They probably feel that it is being abused. So, I guess, they have decided to tighten up.

    They have the authority of law to do so.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page