Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Bull Barrel on a Ruger Mk III?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by FourteenMiles, Feb 22, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. FourteenMiles

    FourteenMiles Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Messages:
    192
    Location:
    USA
    So I was looking to pic up a a Ruger Mk III or II and I was wondering if I should get the bull barreled one, or the regular tapered one. I like the look of the tapered one better but I am wondering what advantage a bull barrel would bring.

    Seems the vast majority of guys on Rimfire Central have the bull barrel...
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  2. 458lottTN

    458lottTN Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2011
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    Jackson, TN
    If you get a MK III, all the bull bbl models have adj. sights and are drilled and tapped for an optics rail (included). The tapered bbl models are usually just as accurate, but the adj. sights are nice. The bull models also balance nicely (with a steel frame).

    Check out the slab side competition model, too. Nice rig.
     
  3. tprice

    tprice Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2009
    Messages:
    155
    Location:
    NW Georgia, USA
    Pro:
    - heavier barrel reduces loss of accuracy from heating up (during long shooting sessions)
    - makes gun more muzzle-heavy (helps improve accuracy for some)

    Con:
    - makes gun overall more heavy
    - may reduce aftermarket options for sights, etc (not by much)

    Go bull and don't look back IMHO. They make a great base for a tack driver. Would stay away from a polymer lower/bull upper setup though, probably too top-heavy for good balance.

    I own a Mk II bull, excellent shooter and quite accurate, after >10,000 rounds and 10 years of ownership!
     
  4. SGW42

    SGW42 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2007
    Messages:
    742
    Location:
    Houston!
    Hold each in your hand and decide which one ballances better for you. I have a standard barrel Mk II and a slabsided Mk III. For me the extra weight up front on the slabesided barrel helps keep the front sight on the bull. But everyone is different, YMMV.
     
  5. CZ57

    CZ57 member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,533
    Location:
    Heart of Texas
    Personally, I prefer the 6 7/8" Target model. It is also a tapered barrel but heavier than the standard model and the extra sight radius really helps with accuracy. I think it balances better than the bull barreled versions.;)
     
  6. metalman8600

    metalman8600 member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2010
    Messages:
    276
    If you go with the bull barrel, you will have the option of having a threaded barrel that has the suppressor as the same diameter, making it look nice and seamless.
     
  7. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,927
    If you like the tapered, get it.

    I prefer the bulls, both my MK I and MK II have them. I doubt if I would ever buy a tapered on, simply because I don't care for the look.
     
  8. CajunBass

    CajunBass Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    5,690
    Location:
    North Chesterfield, Virginia
    I like both, but I probably like the bull barrel a little more.
     
  9. Greg528iT

    Greg528iT Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2010
    Messages:
    1,220
    Buy what YOU like.
    My buddy really likes his 6-7/8" heavy taper
    I really LOVE my 5.5" bull barrel, with red dot sight.

    Rugerreddot.jpg
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  10. Pilot

    Pilot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    6,652
    Location:
    USA
    I like the balance of the bull barrel models. I have two 5.5 inch bull barrel MK II's and a four inch bull barrel MK II-22/45. I do have a standard Anniversary Model, but that remains NIB, so I've never shot it.
     
  11. Fishbed77

    Fishbed77 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2010
    Messages:
    3,041
    Is there any noticeable difference between the accuracy of the 5.5" bull barrel on the Target model and the longer slab-sided barrel of the Competition model?
     
  12. ColtPythonElite

    ColtPythonElite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    7,927
    All the models shoot pretty darn good from what I have seen.
     
  13. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,276
    My Ruger Mark II Slab Side was worthless. Seriously, my standard weight barreled Mark II was more accurate. I know my Slab Side was an exception, but I never forgave Ruger for letting that one slip through. Once bit, twice shy and all that.

    Geno
     
  14. 340PD

    340PD Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,378
    Another option. The Hunter model. Had to borrow the photo.
    RugerHunter.jpg
     
  15. bannockburn

    bannockburn Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2007
    Messages:
    14,629
    I have always liked the looks of the 6 7/8" tapered barrel, but I prefer the balance and overall feel of the 5 1/2" bull barrel. Try them both and pick the one that's right for you.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page