Burris insert rings

[publiuss]

Anyone have experience with the Burris rings with the plastic inserts. They look like a great idea to me. You can change insert sizes to increase range and the rings won't scratch your scope.

 

[Jim Watson]

I have used them to gain elevation and to correct for misaligned gun D&T.

 

[Odd Job]

I have them on two rifles, they work great!
In the Resources section I have uploaded a manual explaining how the rings work:

https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...rings-and-pos-align-offset-inserts-manual.12/

 

[Skylerbone]

Got ‘em on a bunch of rifles and just recently declared them best sub-$100 rings available. I try not to cheap out on rings, even on cheap rifles where some of mine cost less than the rings they wear.

 

[ColtPythonElite]

They are all I use if they are available for the particular rifle I am scoping. I dont like ring marks

 

[BigBL87]

Burris Sig Zees and Warne Maximas are my preferred rings. I actually have some offset inserts for the Burris rings that I never ended up using, ended up going a different route with that rifle and mount.

 

[greyling22]

They saved my bacon with 1 rifle I needed way more elevation on due to what I assume was a poorly machined receiver. Or something. I like them.

 

[Varminterror]

I’ve used several pairs of both the Signature Zee rings (sleek and low drag hunting rings) and XTR Signature rings (bulky and robust tactical rings). Both are great for their purposes. I do prefer an angled rail and a conventional ring design better, but occasionally angled bases are not available, or I want to maximize the potential utility my optic’s elevator, so I’ll put adjustable or angled rings on top of an angled rail.

 

[cdb1]

I have not tried them. My first choice will always be Warne. I’ve used Leupold STD when having windage issues and shimming when having elevation issues. I’ve decided the next time I have issues to try the Burris system with inserts. I’ve heard so much good about them it would be silly of me to not give them a go.