Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Bush to sign border fence bill during Arizona campaign swing

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Desertdog, Oct 3, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    Bush to sign border fence bill during Arizona campaign swing
    http://kvoa.com/Global/story.asp?S=5493368

    President Bush plans to sign a bill that could bring hundreds of miles of fencing to the busiest illegal entry point on the U.S.-Mexico border during a campaign swing through Arizona on Wednesday.


    The signing will be another move in Bush's get-tough approach to illegal immigration and will come in the state that has been the illegal entry hot spot for several years and the center of much of the debate over secure borders.

    Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano is expected to be present for the bill signing at the Camelback Inn in Paradise Valley. The ceremony will follow a breakfast fundraiser for U.S. Rep. Rick Renzi, a Republican seeking a third term from Arizona's sprawling 1st District.

    Included in the Homeland Security funding measure Bush plans to sign is $1.2 billion for border security spending, including fences and other barriers along the border.

    Bush's actions come despite last-minute pleas from the Mexican government for him to veto the bill. In a diplomatic note sent to the United States on Monday, Mexico harshly criticized the Senate vote authorizing 700 miles of new fencing along the border.

    The money will also go toward border infrastructure and other security assets and resources that will complement the development of a high-tech virtual fence that DHS announced almost two weeks ago, agency spokesman Russell Knocke said.

    DHS awarded a $67 million contract to Boeing Co. to install 28 miles of high-tech fencing along a portion of the Arizona border, including towers with cameras and other sophisticated sensing devices. The $67 million comes from money allocated during the fiscal year that ended Saturday, Knocke said.

    The government has said the virtual fence will eventually cover 6,000 miles along the Mexican and Canadian borders in efforts to make them secure. It has not placed a price tag on the project.

    "Fencing is an important part of the plan for the urban areas," Knocke said. Physical fencing will be more critical in those settings where undocumented crossers can quickly blend in with crowds of people, he said.

    In remote areas, Knocke added, the virtual fencing will be more important in enabling Border Patrol agents to intercept illegal immigrants "on their own terms and in the location of their own choosing."

    Mario Martinez, a Border Patrol spokesman in Washington, said no figures were available yet on how much fencing is to be built.

    The visit will be Bush's 15th to Arizona as president, and second since a May 18 stop in Yuma to tour the U.S.-Mexican border near San Luis.

    Bush was scheduled to arrive in Arizona on Tuesday evening following a day of campaigning in California for Republican candidates.

    "The president has shown that he loves Arizona and the voters ... have stayed with him, they're true supporters, true in their loyalty to him," Renzi said.
     
  2. Biker

    Biker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    6,105
    Location:
    Idaho
    Excuse me for not posting a more lengthy reply, but duplicity makes me puke.

    Biker
     
  3. bouis

    bouis member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2006
    Messages:
    369
    So this is how the poor must feel about Democrats and all the things they do to (purportedly) advance their "war on poverty," eh?

    [​IMG]
     
  4. FTF

    FTF member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2006
    Messages:
    561
    Too little, too late and too close to mid-terms. :cuss:

    They're already here you retards!
     
  5. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    That's an expensive fence. We could probably save some money by hiring Mexicans to do it.
     
  6. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama

    Get tough approach???

    I must have entered some bizarro world where up is down, black is white, and Bush is tough on immigration.

    Either that, or its just an election year.
     
  7. salvador31c

    salvador31c Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2006
    Messages:
    189
    Location:
    Phoenix,AZ
    "Bush's actions come despite last-minute pleas from the Mexican government for him to veto the bill. In a diplomatic note sent to the United States on Monday, Mexico harshly criticized the Senate vote authorizing 700 miles of new fencing along the border."

    Sorry for not knowing this if i should but why would Mexico Care if we put up a fence its like when i put up block fence around my home why would my neighbors care they got a nice new block fence for free
     
  8. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Mexico wants illegal immigration to continue. Millions of dollars of US money are sent back to Mexico each year by the illegal immigrants.
     
  9. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    Mexico urges Bush to veto U.S. border fence bill

    Mexico urges Bush to veto U.S. border fence bill
    http://today.reuters.com/news/artic...78_RTRUKOC_0_US-MEXICO-USA.xml&src=rss&rpc=22


    MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexico pleaded with President Bush on Monday to veto a Senate proposal to build a new fence to keep illegal immigrants out, saying it could backfire by making the border more dangerous.

    The U.S. Senate overwhelmingly backed a bill on Friday to construct about 700 miles of fence, a project Republicans hope will impress voters calling for tougher immigration control ahead of November 7 congressional elections.

    "The Mexican government strongly opposes the building of walls in the border area between Mexico and the United States," President Vicente Fox's spokesman Ruben Aguilar told reporters on Monday.

    "This decision hurts bilateral relations, goes against the spirit of cooperation needed to guarantee security on the common, creates a climate of tension in border communities," he said.



    Aguilar said it would send a diplomatic note to Washington later on Monday urging Bush to veto the bill, which requires the president's signature to become law.
     
  10. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    I'm very nearly a proponent of open borders.

    But the Mexican government's stand on the border irritates the daylights out of me. And the fact that anyone at all on this side of the border gives a flying @#$! about what the Mexicans think we should do about immigration is arguably even more annoying.
     
  11. 3rdpig

    3rdpig Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    603
    At this moment in time I don't care WHY it's being done, just that it IS being done. It's pointless to worry about what to do with the illegals that are already here while thousands more are pouring across the border each day. Shut off the flow, then we'll deal with illegals already here and employers that knowingly hire them

    I'm glad to see the Republicans are getting the message from their base, "Start behaving and voting like conservatives or we'll vote third party and Dems will wind up in office".

    I'm also happy that the core Republican base is standing firm and not putting up with the RINO's in the Senate. The message is much like the one that the Father of Dobie Gillis had for his son. "I brought you into this world, and I can take you back out again". We put them there, and by God we can put them right back in the private sector if they stray too far from their base.
     
  12. mons meg

    mons meg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    727
    Location:
    Logan County, OK
    Shutting off the flow will not be accomplished with a fence.
     
  13. ilbob

    ilbob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    11,428
    Location:
    Illinois
    how about a real get tough policy? a few snipers at random places along the border. inexpensive and effective. it is time to take the invasion seriously.
     
  14. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,085
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Feckless.
     
  15. fourays2

    fourays2 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Messages:
    378
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    trying to figure out just who's the bigger hypocrit here, either jorge bush or our "alternative lifestyle" governor who has vetoed every piece of border legislation given to her.:banghead:
     
  16. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    It's a good start.

    We need to constrict the border flow first, then go after who is here.

    The fact that Mexico is upset at this, means it will work.

    I support it.
     
  17. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    During the Clinton years, how many Democrats switched to the Republican Party? IIRC it was over 400. If so, maybe that is what happened to to the Republican party.

    If that is the case, let's get the third party candidates to change the party to where we want it.
     
  18. Keith Wheeler

    Keith Wheeler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Ah yes, Mexico's reaction surely trumps two thousand years of history that shows fences don't work. From the Great Wall to the Berlin Wall...
     
  19. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    The border fence at San Diego is working extremely well and was supported by Democrats and Republicans alike.
     
  20. Desertdog

    Desertdog Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    1,980
    Location:
    Ridgecrest Ca
    But the Berlin Wall did work. Yes, I realize that a few got through, then hords got through when the wall fell.

    Don't forget;The Berlin Wall was not to keep people out , it was to keep people in. Never forget that
     
  21. Keith Wheeler

    Keith Wheeler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2005
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    Arkansas
    In San Diego. In very controlled, very calm terrain. I lived in San Diego for 6 years. One of my favorite hobbies during that time period was to take my Rover out into the "back country" -- the Anza Borrego desert, "valley of the moon", "canyon sin nombre"...fun places to go. Have you ever been there? The terrain is ungodly rough, to put it mildy. One of my favorite humourous anecdotes was having lunch on the tailgate of the Rover, only a few hundred yards from the border, watching a border patrol agent trying in vain to get his jeep cherokee up the hill we were on top of. A few minutes later he came walking past on foot...

    Mexicans who struggle through that terrain won't be stopped by a fence. It seems to me that a fence will be on a difficulty level of 8, the terrain 10+. Add in to that the remoteness of these places and difficulty of maintaining any structure in this environment, one of the most geologically active places on earth. Research the railroad through Anza-Borrego, and how difficult that was to maintain.

    My point being "build a fence! build a fence!" is about like the anti-gunners saying "no more school shootings, ban guns!".

    Are there places where a border fence is practical? Sure. And these exist in many places, and should be bolstered where practical. The concept of building "The Great Fence of America's South Border", an all encompassing way to keep "them" out, will be an expensive waste of effort. In my opinion, the concept of a complete fence on the border is only a knee-jerk reaction presented by well meaning citizens and clueless politicians who have never actually visited the rugged and punishing terrain they are talking about.
     
  22. LAR-15

    LAR-15 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2004
    Messages:
    3,385
    But a fence in areas where the border is easy to cross is necessary.

    It's not a 'cure all' but in certain places a solid fence is needed.

    I'm not naive enough to think a fence is the magic answer.
     
  23. MrTuffPaws

    MrTuffPaws Member

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,511
    Location:
    Az
    Can't we just annex Mexico and be done with it?
     
  24. longeyes

    longeyes member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,227
    Location:
    True West...Hotel California
    I'm waiting to see a crackdown on employers. Until we do that, and start taking away public assistance and money transfer, we're not going to make serious headway on this problem.

    The fence is one important step but only the first of many needed.

    Color me skeptical.
     
  25. .38 Special

    .38 Special Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2006
    Messages:
    2,303
    Location:
    Orange County, CA.
    Amen, brother. There ain't nothing wrong with Mexico except for Mexican government. And one well armed troop of Boy Scouts could solve that little problem within a week, max.

    Then instead of being a bunch of damned foreigners stealing jobs from decent Americans, they'd just be a bunch of hard working folks trying to get ahead.

    Hmm...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page