CA Handgun Roster/Unsafe Handgun Act facing new legal challenges

Status
Not open for further replies.
California is forcing these issues one at a time. Each tiny incremental step in banning guns will have to go all the way to SCOTUS to get knocked down, an expensive (for our side) proposition.
And why we need permanent enforcement of federal/state laws like for First Amendment to stop states from passing future unconstitutional 2A laws.

Slowly but surely we are getting there, just like for First Amendment.
 
Update to Boland v Bonta (CA handgun roster) and Renna v Bonta (CA Unsafe Handgun Act/Handgun roster) - https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...-legal-challenges.913421/page-3#post-12739163


9th Circuit vacated both cases pending Duncan - https://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2024-03-25-Order.pdf

Submission of this case is vacated pending the en banc decision in Duncanv. Bonta, 9th Circuit.​

Same for Renna - https://assets.nationbuilder.com/fi...4.03.25_049_ORDER_Staying_Case.pdf?1711395230

Submission of this case is vacated pending the en banc decision in Duncanv. Bonta, 9th Circuit.​
 
Depending on the outcome of November election and `resulting make up of Congress, this bill could become reality and do away with states' handgun rosters.

Issa, Stefanik Introduce Legislation to Prohibit Unconstitutional Handgun Roster - https://issa.house.gov/media/press-...ion-prohibit-unconstitutional-handgun-rosters

August 20, 2024 WASHINGTON – Today, Congressman Darrell Issa (CA-48) and House Republican Conference Chair Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (NY-21) introduced the Modern Firearm Safety Act which will stop states from enacting unconstitutional “handgun rosters” that prevent law-abiding citizens from accessing modern, safer handgun models.​
“Handgun rosters are a tactic that serves only a single purpose: to undermine the Second Amendment under the cynical pretense of firearm safety. These rosters impose excessive and unnecessary requirements that only restrict access to modern firearms equipped with the most up-to-date safety features,” said Rep. Issa. “I’m proud to join Chairwoman Stefanik in defending our sacred constitutional rights and ending these unjust restrictions.”​
“I am proud to introduce the Modern Firearm Safety Act to put a stop to the unconstitutional gun-grabbing agenda pushed on law-abiding American citizens by Far-Left Democrats like Kathy Hochul. My legislation would ban Albany Democrats from imposing illegal handgun roster requirements meant to deter gun ownership. I will always stand up for our Second Amendment rights and provide a critical check to any entity attempting to encroach on their liberties,” said Rep. Stefanik.
California, New York, Maryland, Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia have already enacted restrictive handgun rosters, with others considering similar measures. These rosters currently mandate that firearms include costly and unnecessary features including loaded chamber indicators, magazine disconnect mechanisms, and microstamping technology. This makes it nearly impossible for manufacturers to introduce new handgun models.​
The Modern Firearm Safety Act prohibits states from enforcing these restrictive requirements, ensuring that citizens have access to the most up-to-date and safe firearms available. Additionally, the legislation aligns with a recent 2024 federal court ruling that found California's handgun roster requirements to be unconstitutional.​
Additional cosponsors of the Modern Firearm Safety Act include Reps. Chuck Edwards (NC-11), Clay Higgins (LA-03), Claudia Tenney (NY-24), Lance Gooden (TX-05), Mike Collins (GA-10), Ashley Hinson (IA-02), Andy Harris (MD-01), and Andy Biggs (AZ-05).​
The bill has received support from the following organizations:​
  • National Rifle Association (NRA)
  • Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation (CSF)
  • Peace Officer’s Research Association of California (PORAC)
  • National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF)
  • Firearms Regulatory Accountability Coalition (FRAC)
“The Modern Firearm Safety Act contains positive provisions that would bar abusive laws and administrative rules that are designed to stifle firearms technology and/or limit access to mainstream firearms in common use by law-abiding Americans and sportsmen. Overall, the cited bill’s provisions are beneficial to law-abiding sportsmen, lawfully-armed Americans, and the industry—and FRAC strongly supports such provisions,” said Travis White, President & CEO of FRAC.​
 
The fact that the roster still manages to exist at all, even after numerous legal challenges across the last decade (and then some), is absolutely mind-boggling.
There are handgun roster cases making their up the judicial system to the Supreme Court from different states.

And just like for First Amendment Supreme Court rulings that received permanent enforcement by the way of federal/state laws, same will happen for Second Amendment Supreme Court rulings because the Second Amendment is not a "second class right" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_...eme_Court_cases_involving_the_First_Amendment

Bill introduced in post #78 is such and depending on the November election results decided by "We the People", bills as such could indeed become federal/state laws to apply permanent enforcement of Bill of Rights/Supreme Court rulings.
 
Fingers crossed!!!

Ironic that as a retired LEO I can keep the handguns I bought while on active duty but since I retired, I can’t buy LEO only handguns.

Doesn’t make sense!!! Apparently I wasn’t a threat when I was working, but I am now???

Oh, CA considered you a threat back then to. They just wanted you to be a bigger threat than the bad guys
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top