Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Calling Mosin 91/30 experts

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by ghettofab, Apr 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ghettofab

    ghettofab Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Tennessee
    Hello all.
    I've got a 1939 mosin that has had its bolt forced matched to the reciever via electropenciling. It's in exellent condition with a bright bore and suprisingly enough, a good trigger with just a little creep. Point is, I'd like to put a scope on it, and I was wondering if this rifle is considered "matching numbers", due to the electropenciling. If so, then I won't cut it, to preserve "value". Thanks all.
     
  2. cortez kid

    cortez kid Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Messages:
    358
    Location:
    Scranton, Pa
    Technically an electro-penciled stencil is a forced match and not a true match. If it were me I would probably wait until I found an all matching gun, then modify the one you have. It's clear your concerned with the authenticity of your collection. Get the collector you want and the shooter you want to make.
    kid
     
  3. armoredman

    armoredman Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2003
    Messages:
    16,767
    Location:
    proud to be in AZ
    Yes, and no. The electropenciling was done at the arsenal, when it was re arsenalled, probably in the 50s sometime. Mosins used to have all thier bolt dumped into a big pile during cleaning, and it is kinda rare to find a wartime with the same bolt number.
    I would not cut it anyway, due to the fact therewill never be any more of them, and it is a historical peice by itself. It is, of course, your rifle, and you may do what you please, but I would reccomend you look at the scope mounts that replace the rear sight, and work from the rear sight base.
    Enjoy!
     
  4. kfranz

    kfranz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2003
    Messages:
    1,155
    Location:
    WI
    I'd agree with armoredman. There's no need to cut it if all you want is a scope.
     
  5. MilsurpShooter

    MilsurpShooter Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,541
    Location:
    Under a rock somewhere
    1939, hex reciever probably? I'd say go with a scout mount on the rear site. Minimal fuss (PU scopes are a little tougher to install on a Hex Reciever then a round one from what I hear)

    The electropencil marks don't necessarily mean it's a part rifle, it could have been done during a re-arsenal www.7.62x54r.net has some wonderful pictures of re-arsenal markings, I'd check your rifle for those before going to do the scope method.

    All said and done it's your rifle, you can do with it as you please. Some will come on here and say go ahead and do it, it's a $60 rifle... Well they're right, for now, I bet alot of people were saying the same thing back when the Springfields were for sale. Good luck with it either way.
     
  6. Avenger29

    Avenger29 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Messages:
    2,728
    Location:
    SC
    Go with a scout mount and extended eye relief scope instead of the reciever mount. No drilling or tapping to fool with, and it does not ruin the value of the rifle. You can also drop it into one of the synthetic stocks to save the wood stock from damage.
     
  7. Hoppy590

    Hoppy590 Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Messages:
    4,277
    Location:
    MA :(
    well all points seem to have been covered.

    * electro pencil isnt a bad thing for a shooter
    * Moral dilema of to drill or not to drill

    heres the question. what kind of scope do you intend to put on it? due to the split bridge design you need a bent handled bolt for any traditional scope, or soviet PU/PE style. long eye relief or "scout" style you dont

    if you want a soviet style ( sniper style) id go and get a "ex-Sniper" while they are still available and still some what cheap. these are rifles that were drilled for mounts and then either issued as snipers or put in storage. pre drilled holes make mounting a breaze

    if you want a traditional hunter type scope. to be honest i feel youd be doing yourself a disservice by investing time and money into the rifle, bent bolt handle, drill and tap to come out of it with an inferior hunting sporting rifle than if you just bought a stevens 200. but im not here to beat a dead horse
     
  8. ghettofab

    ghettofab Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2007
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Tennessee
    thanks for the replies

    Regarding the scout -type mounts:

    I have to admit i'm leary of these things. One, I see the probability to lose zero easily, due to the need to center them in the rear sight base. Lots of screw adjustments to wobble loose under recoil. Anyone have problems with that?

    Also, I don't want to mount a pistol scope on a rifle capable of more range than the magnification of a 2-4x scope will allow. So, my question is, how much eye relief do I need to mount a scope in the rear sight?

    Thanks again everyone.
     
  9. redman900

    redman900 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2007
    Messages:
    117
    scout scpoe

    :neener: I have a m38 mosin and I have a scout scope on it and it has not come loose or lost zero. Like everyone else said gun can only go up in price. So keep all the parts from the rear sight. And first and foremost ENJOY your Rifle!!
     
  10. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    With inferior scope mounts, yes. Darrell's are the ones to get. Do a search on him and you'll find a bunch of threads.

    http://p102.ezboard.com/fparallaxscurioandrelicfirearmsforumsfrm85
     
  11. Gustav

    Gustav Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    554
    M-39 a keeper!

    Many of the Finns were rebuilt or arsenall repaired at one point or another so mismatched can be quite normal and elecro penciling is not uncommon. Compared to the total number of Russian Mosin Nagants made the Finns are a small percentage of the Mosins out there.
    Few Mosins remain in Finland today as the majority have been sold here already so prices will go up especially if kept as original as possible.
    The M39 was adopted by Finland after extensive testing and suggestions from both the Civil Guard and the Army providing both with one common rifle.
    They had to meet high standards before being accepted into service many consider the M-39 and 28/30 the most accurate and best of the Mosins
    they were the last of the type developed other than the type 59 carbines which basically are cut downs.
    Back when the M-27s m-28s and 28-30s were imported IIRC 1986 or so they were inexpensive under $100 now they can bring four to eight times that amount depending on condition markings and rarity.
    Russia produced millions of different Mosin Nagants
    Finlands production total is in the 6 figure range IIRC total counting all models.
    If you simply must scope it consider a repro PE or PEM scope and see through mount they are a copy of the old Zeiss (IIRC) scope, make a repro M-39 SOV
     
  12. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    Actually, I think he has a 91/30 made in 1939.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page