Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

campaign finance: unintended consequences...or not?

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Monkeyleg, Jul 9, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Monkeyleg

    Monkeyleg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    5,058
    Location:
    Decatur, AL
    The co-author of the Campaign Finance Reform legislation (otherwise known as the Repeal of the First Amendment) is facing some serious challengers here in WI.

    The best-funded challenger is Russ Darrow, who owns 20 new car dealerships that bear his name. He's been running a fair number of campaign ads, and is largely funding his own campaign for the moment.

    And therein lies the rub. Since the car ads mention "Russ Darrow Pontiac" or "Russ Darrow Buick," the question before the Federal Elections Commision is whether the ads for his car dealerships constitute illegal political advertising. Yep, that's right, folks. They're suggesting that his company not run any advertising 60 days before the election.

    That sixty-day period is also one during which most car dealers advertise the most.

    Not even George Orwell or Ayn Rand could have predicted this.

    The full story is too long to post here, so here's the link: http://www.jsonline.com/news/state/jul04/242434.asp
     
  2. deej

    deej Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    449
    Location:
    (Occupied) California Republic
    Everything old is new again:

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page