Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Can you shoot more accurate with a big or small caliber handgun?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by 357-8-times, Apr 14, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 357-8-times

    357-8-times Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    210
    Shooting offhand that is...
     
  2. Eric F

    Eric F Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2007
    Messages:
    2,934
    as physics goes a smaller bore should be more accurate but then again some one will argue that one out............
     
  3. k_dawg

    k_dawg Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Messages:
    816
    Flinching is probably the main reason why someone is more accurate with a smaller caliber
     
  4. Snapping Twig

    Snapping Twig Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Messages:
    655
    Maybe it's the guns involved, but I definitely shoot my 25-7 .45LC better than most of my other pistols, that said, my 627-0 is also a one ragged hole shooter.

    I also have a Kimber custom CDP II that shoots a ragged hole, so that's 2 .45 cal pistols and one .357, so IMO, it's the particular pistol - all things being equal.
     
  5. Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow

    Dr. Tad Hussein Winslow member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    13,146
    There's no mechanical/physics reason why larger or smaller would be more inherently accurate or inaccurate, but two things:

    1. Due to less flinch (potentially), the smaller the better, as a practical matter, in the real world. .22s are easy to shoot well for this reason.
    2. But, all other things being equal, it's easier to make one-hole groups with the *same number of shots* with a big bore. This is "cheating" because the C-T-C measurement will be the same, but the outer limits of the holes "reach" further in all directions, including toward one another - toward the center of the group. A "one hole group" *appears* a bit more impressive to the untrained eye.
     
  6. theotherwaldo

    theotherwaldo Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2008
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    In the Wild Horse Desert of Texas
    I was curious about this, too, so I pulled out my Super Blackhawk .44 mag and Single Six .22lr, put up matching paper plates at fifty yards, and tried it out.

    I did better with the .44. The gun is so heavy and comfortable that you feel like you could pull your hands back and just leave the gun in mid-air. Rock-steady.

    The .22 isn't quite as long or heavy, so it's slightly harder to stabilize off-hand. It feels easier to shoot, but the results don't match.

    my .02
     
  7. CBS220

    CBS220 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Messages:
    868
    I'm not sure how you would prove or even justify this. Benchrest shooters would all be packing .17s and .20s instead of 6mms if this were the case, it seems.

    Now, I'm not saying you're wrong, but I find that many people shoot a moderate to soft recoiling large bore handgun better than snappy, smaller caliber ones (.45 vs. .40, for instance).

    As a matter of what it does to the target, we may as well debate the difference between being hit by a Uhaul or your UPS delivery man :p
     
  8. tblt

    tblt member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2007
    Messages:
    954
    Location:
    florida
    Biger for some reason.
    I really suck with a 22 and good with 9,40,45,357 magand 44 mag
     
  9. cleardiddion

    cleardiddion Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2007
    Messages:
    1,353
    Location:
    US
    So far, of all the handguns I've fired (.22, .40, .45, .500, 9mm) I've had the best luck with a Glock 21 in .45. So I guess towards the bigger end.
     
  10. Mousegun

    Mousegun Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2005
    Messages:
    555
    The longer and more often you shoot larger cal guns like the 45, the less flinching becomes a problem.

    I have been shooting 45's for a lot of years and would much rather shoot a 45 for score than a 22 who's holes are a lot smaller.

    Of course the 45 of which I speak is a home built fully accurized specimen that can punch a 2" or less hole with 10 shots from a Ransom rest at 50 yards.

    I have reached a point where I never flinch in anticipation of recoil.
     
  11. kamagong

    kamagong Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2006
    Messages:
    850
    I shoot better with my Baer Concept II than I do with my Ruger 22/45. It doesn't really make sense, but it's true. It's probably a couple of things. 1911s point very naturally for me whereas the balance of the 22/45 is a bit barrel heavy. The Concept II also has an excellent trigger; the 22/45 not so much. I'm thinking of changing out some of the internals for Volquartsen parts.
     
  12. The Annoyed Man

    The Annoyed Man Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2007
    Messages:
    596
    Location:
    Grapevine, Texas
    I shoot better with my 3" Kimber UCII than I do with either my H&K USP Compact .40, or either of my full sized 1911s. I shoot as well with my 5" Model 29 in .44 mag as I do with the Kimber. I shoot lousy with my Colt Government .380.

    I don't own any .22 pistols, but I shoot worst with my smallest caliber pistol, the .380, and I shoot best with either a very small .45 or a very large .44. Does one of you want to give me a .22 pistol so I can find out how I would do?

    :D
     
  13. makarovnik

    makarovnik Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2006
    Messages:
    1,677
    I shoot better with a bigger gun regardless of caliber. For me a longer sight radius and more "weighty" gun means better accuracy.
     
  14. Elza

    Elza Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2007
    Messages:
    692
    Location:
    North Texas
    I do about the same with either for the most part (what ever that says. :eek: ). My best shooting is with my Smith 29.
     
  15. lefteye

    lefteye Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    Iowa
    My Ruger Mk II SS Bull Barrel is much easier to shoot accurately (and is far more accurate) than my Kahr P45 or Ruger SP101 .357 Mag (with full loads.)
     
  16. subierex

    subierex Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2007
    Messages:
    271
    I've never been able to shoot 45ACP worth a hoot, even after trying multiple different platforms. 45Colt thru my Rossi lever is one of my most accurate.

    .357 thru a 6" S&W has been my most accurate handgun.
     
  17. SsevenN

    SsevenN Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    554
    Location:
    NM
    I agree that the caliber of the bullet isn't relavent. IMHO its all about the barrel. A 6" barrel is naturally more accurate then a 3" barrel....Right?:rolleyes:
     
  18. GearHead_1

    GearHead_1 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2007
    Messages:
    316
    Location:
    Utah
    All other factors being equal, If I answer this as an over the long haul type question it would have to be a small caliber. It doesn't start out that way but 100 rounds later it becomes reality.
     
  19. Radagast
    • Contributing Member

    Radagast Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,148
    Location:
    Australia/OZ
    Larger calibers for me as well. The most accurate guns I have shot are, in descending order:
    S&W 686 six inch
    Bul M5 .38 super 1911
    S&W 66 four inch
    HK USP 9SD
    Glock 17

    Then the .22s.

    The fact that I've put tens of thousands of rounds through my centrefire guns (former IPSC competitor) and only a few hundred through my rimfires may have something to do with this.
     
  20. hockeybum

    hockeybum Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2006
    Messages:
    300
    .357 snub nosed revolver is more accurate than .40 S&W. .40 S&W is more accurate than .45 para ordinance. I like the .357, I put the 5 shots into a 2 inch group.
     
  21. gbran

    gbran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2003
    Messages:
    2,977
    Location:
    california
    38/357 Wadcutters out of a Blackhawk are about as good as it gets for me.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page