Cannon rounds from WWII

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Bazoo, May 15, 2022.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. 22250Rem

    22250Rem Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,765
    Location:
    Western NY State
    Never thought of that thing being a spittoon. Perhaps that was what it was being utilized as. It was back around the mid 1970's so the memory is faint. All I can recall is it having cigarette butts in it, but it may have been a dual- purpose spittoon & ashtray. Good point concerning those handles, I never thought of that.
     
    230RN and RetiredUSNChief like this.
  2. 230RN
    • Contributing Member

    230RN I keep pushing that pendulum back.

    Joined:
    May 27, 2006
    Messages:
    7,558
    Location:
    Colorado
    POLICE YOUR BRASS
    Of marginal interest to this thread...
    1943 » Sicilian Campaign: Operation Husky
    (Could not post the image itself for some reason. Here's the link to the document's page.)

    https://www.history.navy.mil/content/history/nhhc/our-collections/photography/numerical-list-of-images/nara-series/80-g/80-G-40000/80-G-42522.html

    Empty shell cases litter the deck near the forward 6-inch/47-caliber gun turrets of USS Brooklyn (CL-40) after she had bombarded Licata, Sicily, during the early hours of the invasion, 10 July 1943. (80-G-42522).
     
    Last edited: Sep 17, 2022
    22250Rem likes this.
  3. Bazoo

    Bazoo Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2021
    Messages:
    2,365
    Location:
    Cecilia, Ky
    It’s odd to me that effort is not made to reload these big boys.
     
  4. CapnMac

    CapnMac Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,523
    Location:
    DFW (formerly Brazos County), Texas
    Part of that is that you'd need a press the size of a one-car garage.
    The other is that the stresses involved are right at maximum levels.
    Which is logical, if a single use is intended--make the case "just enough" to work, and not a gram more.
     
  5. hk940

    hk940 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2008
    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    NC, USA
    I think another reason for not reloading is it was more important to get supplies to the troops than to worry about getting empties back to be reused.
    As they say it's the cost of doing business!
     
    RetiredUSNChief and rabid wombat like this.
  6. rabid wombat

    rabid wombat Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2014
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    TX
    RetiredUSNChief likes this.
  7. RetiredUSNChief

    RetiredUSNChief Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2012
    Messages:
    11,317
    Location:
    SC (Home), VA (Work)
    There's also only so much room aboard ship, room that's better served for other things in order to maximize what space you have shipboard overall.

    Certainly, there would be absolutely NO reloading aboard ship. First of all, having reloading supplies themselves would take up initial space that could be utilized for the storage of more live munitions. Second, it would be INCREDIBLY dangerous to have all the powder/primer material itself aboard a combat vessel just lying around waiting to be ignited. That's a fire/explosion hazard of frightening magnitude.

    Even simply saving the empties to be off loaded later would be a logistics issue which would radically interfere with the speedy reprovisioning of the vessel for return to combat.
     
  8. CapnMac

    CapnMac Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,523
    Location:
    DFW (formerly Brazos County), Texas
    Yeah, near two decades after being needful. The Battleship Texas Foundation, which has taken over maintenance of the ship has not covered itself in a lot of glory over it's span of "preservation." It's a very sore topic among the hard-core fans and volunteers. The fact that the only sure thing at this point being that Texas is to never return to San Jacinto, where she has resided since 1948. TBF is rather quietly auctioning off the ship to whoever promises the most dollars to display her. There are any number of issues which the accounting of the tax appropriations and how they were spent over the last 22 years. There's the annoying factor that the required number of paying visits per year for the required 100% "paid for" budget exceeds what any museum ship currently gets, and been glossed over, and a rug put over it, too.

    I may be sore picky about this as someone who put in many hours aboard, and donated rather a lot of artifacts to their collection.

    Back on topic, Texas actually had very little brass-cased ammo aboard, historically, only the 1.1 inch and 40mm Bofors ammo (some of the 20mm ammo was steel cased, some brass). Both the 5"50 and 14"45 guns used bagged charges, and that was all through Texas' life.

    Cool side note--the only way to keep the quad 1.1" "machine gun" mounts running was to station a Gunner's mate underneath the weapon and to poind the bottom of the receivers wit ha 4# sledge when they jammed.
    Quad1.1onUSSEnterpriseCV-6.jpg 28_mm_AA_gun.jpg
    Nicknamed "the Chicago piano" by the crews. The mount needed crew of ten, and weighed as much as a twin Bofors to be less effective.
    The round was a 28x119mm that was not quite 1 pound per each with a barely 7000 yard range.
     
  9. lysanderxiii

    lysanderxiii Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,539
    Location:
    North Carolina
    In August 1945, the USS Texas (BB-35) was fitted with the following armaments:

    5 ea - Mk 3, Mod 14, 14"/45 two gun turrets
    6 ea - Mk 13, Mod 6, 5"/51 single pedestal mounts
    10 ea - Mk 22, Mod 4, 3"/50 single pedestal mounts
    7 ea - Mk 2, Mod 14, 40mm AA Quadruple Mounts
    3 ea - Mk 2 Mod 18, 40mm AA Quadruple Mounts
    44 ea - Mk 10 Mod 23, 20mm AA single mounts
    2 ea - Mk 4, Mod 3, Main Battery Gun Directors
    2 ea - Mk 6, Mod 7, 5" Gun Directors
    10 ea - Mk 51, Mod 2, AA Gun Director
    2 ea - Mk 50, Mod 4, 3" Gun Directors
    4 ea - Mk 51, Mod 3, 3" Gun Directors
    1 ea - Mk 21, Mod 4, Stable Vertical Directors
    2 ea - Mk 3, Mod 2, Main Battery Radar set
    1 ea - Mk 8, Mod 3 Main Battery Radar set
    2 ea - Mk 10, Mod 5, 3'"or 5" DP Radar set

    The 20mm used 3 types of case, the Mark 2 and 4 were brass, the Mark 3 was steel.
    The 40mm also used 3 types of case, the Mark 1 and 2 were brass, the Mark 3 was steel.
    The 3"/50, Mk 22, used 4 types of cases, the Mark 3, Mod 0, Mark 3, Mod 2, and Mark 7 were brass, the Mark 9 was steel.

    Only the 14"/45 and 5"/51, were bag guns, a majority of the ammunition would have been cased ammunition.

    The 5"/51s were in casemates at the base of the forward tripod mast.
    The 3"/50s were in open tubs, three above the 5" casemates, and two aft abeam the after super firing 14" turret
     
    Last edited: Sep 19, 2022
  10. DustyGmt

    DustyGmt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    3,188
    Location:
    Green Mountains Vermont
    I have a couple, one is misplaced at the moment but my mom was using it as a flower vase and I would like to locate it, it's huge, I think it might be the same as the larger two pictured above. The other one I have is on my TV stand and when I'm home ill post a picture, I'd like to know what it is.
     
    RetiredUSNChief likes this.
  11. DustyGmt

    DustyGmt Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2016
    Messages:
    3,188
    Location:
    Green Mountains Vermont
    It's also crazy to think of the Navy Ship guns that were obsolete and scrapped along with the thousands of tons of shells that just got demil'd and scrapped. Crazy firepower to just get scrapped, they should have just sold it to us....:D
     
    Bazoo, Demi-human, lightman and 2 others like this.
  12. CapnMac

    CapnMac Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2009
    Messages:
    14,523
    Location:
    DFW (formerly Brazos County), Texas
    Passing familiar, what with having volunteered aboard for right at two decades.
    In the 20s, the tops of the cranes sported 3"25s. The mounts had a small davit to haul ammo up--it was considered less than ideal.
    ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fum1fppku39l91.jpg
     
  13. lysanderxiii

    lysanderxiii Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2015
    Messages:
    2,539
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Yes, these seem a somewhat awkward to work . . .

    0CokAzD.jpg

    The 3" mounts were removed during the 1925-26 overhaul, this was the overhaul that removed the cage masts and replaced them with the current tripod masts.

    013515.jpg

    In 1942 she had her AA suite upgraded by adding numerous 20mm and 40mm mounts all over the ship. New smaller tubs were put atop the crane supports and each had a 20mm Oerlikon put in them.

    013519b.jpg
     
  14. DukeConnor

    DukeConnor Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2016
    Messages:
    989
    I was a 13E FDC chief. Yep basically a artillery god :)

    Shot a lot of arti. The 8 inch was a amazing field gun. been looking for a demilled 8 inch howitzer round for years. 105's had casings. 155 and 8 inch were bags.
     
    rabid wombat likes this.
  15. MutinousDoug

    MutinousDoug Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2005
    Messages:
    1,132
    Location:
    Arizona
    I haven't any real stories associated with this pic. These were among my Dad's trinkets and souvenirs from 32 years of service with the AAC-USAF from 1939-1972.
    The big one is stamped 120mm M-24 and the little one has no ID on the base- was given him as a retirement memento by an Army Arty outfit, as evidenced by the cutoff length and cartridge brass handle. 30-06 cartridges ArtyBrass2.jpg for perspective.
    Dad didn't retire until almost two years after I got out in Jan 1971.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2022
    NIGHTLORD40K likes this.
  16. Robert

    Robert Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    13,844
    Location:
    Texan by birth, in Colorado cause I hate humidity
    As fascinating as this is, and it truly is, it has wandered pretty far from anything remotely on topic for THR. As much as I LOVE BB35, she is also off topic. This is one of those times where I hate my job...
     
    NIGHTLORD40K likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice