Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Carbine/Rifle "Pistols" ???

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by SullyVols, Mar 13, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SullyVols

    SullyVols Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Messages:
    117
    Im assuming whether correctly or not that if a "rifle" does not have a stock then its barrel can be less than 16".

    I've seen an AK variant and an AR variant "pistols" with ~12" barrels.

    Legality and praticality? Experiences?

    Thanks
     
  2. adelbridge

    adelbridge Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107
    Location:
    Texas
    If it is a rifle it has to have a stock and a minimum barrel length of 16"

    If it is a pistol/handgun it can have any size barrel and cannot have a stock or certain other features like a vertical foregrip.


    the gray area is switching back and forth between a rifle and pistol format like with Thompson Center Encores and Contenders. If it starts life as a rifle it technically has to stay a rifle. You can turn your pistol into a rifle but it has to have a 16" minimum barrel and a stock. Look at the Mec Tec conversion.
    If you want to make an AR-15 pistol start off with a bare receiver and have the FFL log it as Receiver/Frame only in his books and the 4473. If you have a receiver/frame registered you can build what ever you want.
     
  3. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,065
    Ultimately, it's how the reciever (the "firearm" under our dumb laws) was connoted at its manufacture. Which is why you can't saw down a Mosin into a bolt-action pistol without tax stamp, but can buy an AR pistol with the goofy buffer tube sticking out with a tennis ball on the end and a magazine to hold onto.

    And this isn't even getting into the constructive possession thing Adelbridge is alluding to. I assume there's a more informative sticky in the NFA forum, I'd check or ask around there.

    TCB
     
  4. CA Raider

    CA Raider Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    244
  5. PGT

    PGT Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Messages:
    364
    Location:
    Leesburg, VA
    that Rossi has a 16" barrel and is called a rifle. Now, the only area of concern is OAL but I'm sure it meets regs if Rossi calls it a rifle.
     
  6. MrCleanOK

    MrCleanOK Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2007
    Messages:
    1,355
    Location:
    Alaska
    With a lower that was transferred from an FFL as either a stripped lower or a pistol, you can build a pistol with a < 16" barrel and no buttstock. You can add a buttstock and a >16" barrel and turn that pistol into a rifle. You can go from pistol to rifle. You can not go from rifle to pistol.

    To me, the only practical purpose for AR pistols is to test a barrel/gas sytem that you intend to SBR. You build the pistol, shoot the crap out of it. If it works, SBR the lower and put a buttstock on it.

    Some people also think that a noisy rifle you can't shoot from the shoulder is fun, but I'm not one of them.
     
  7. OARNGESI

    OARNGESI Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2011
    Messages:
    803
    They make really fun range toys
     

    Attached Files:

  8. barnbwt

    barnbwt Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2011
    Messages:
    7,065
    There's a really funny picture of Steve McQueen "sighting" down the bare barrel of his "Mare's Leg" trying to hit something at range (good luck with that) :D

    TCB
     
  9. pdsmith505

    pdsmith505 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    385
  10. GarySTL

    GarySTL Member

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2005
    Messages:
    873
    Location:
    Warrenton, MO
    I've got a ranch hand in 45 Colt. Fun to shoot, but, in my opinion, not too practical.
     
  11. Upstater

    Upstater Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2012
    Messages:
    284
    Location:
    Upstate N.Y.
    One thing of concern with a ranch hand is that if the state you live in has a law regarding the maximum weight of a pistol that model may not be legal as it weighs over 50 oz. in N.Y. Believe it or not it is not legal!
     
  12. B!ngo

    B!ngo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2011
    Messages:
    781
    Separate from the legal issue, the practicality issue is important as well.
    I have not shot an AR pistol but from everything I have read, youtubed, observed and so on, they are toys and/or fill very niche needs but in general do not very satisfying and appear to be a rather miserable shooting experience.
    I see many people struggling to shoot them accurately or comfortably, many others building, shooting and then selling them very quickly, others in a constant state of 'improvement' but never seeming to end in a satisfying and stable gunsafe member in good standing.
    Based on all of that, I wouldn't recommend a 'true AR'-based pistol configuration for anything other than the toy/project/niche thing.
    BTW, some time ago I had a chance to purchase a 'pistol' configuration of my MP5/94 H&K clone - i.e. the stablemate to the AT94. It's a much better designed version of rifle-turned-pistol with no buffer tube to muck up the design. But with the mag limit out here it really made little sense and I passed.I do have some regret on that one but that's the only pistol-from-rifle design that I'd consider. Perhaps I'd also look at the Sig design that is like the MP5 pistol but chambered in .223/5.56. But neither of those have buffer tube oddities that are common in all AR pistols.
    Up to you.
    B
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2013
  13. backbencher

    backbencher Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2005
    Messages:
    397
    Location:
    Texas
    SV, I built an AR "pistol" as a legal stop-gap enroute to a an AR "rifle". I started w/ a stripped Stag receiver that the dealer transferred to my my brother as a "pistol". (Now they are transferred as "others".) I bought the virginity certificate from Stag for $10, added a full length buffer tube and a 16" bbl, and had a "pistol" longer than my issue M4. Just recently, I bought a carbine buffer tube & put a stock on it so I could practice for this deployment.

    I literally only built it as a pistol so that someday should I want an actual AR pistol, I can take the stock off my rifle, & put a short bbl on it, assuming current laws, etc, don't change.

    AK pistols are heavy, but they have a much more effective round out of a short bbl than a .223" AR. .223" AR ballistics out of SBRs suck - even my M4 is measurably worse, even by Army standards, than the 20" M-16. And the AR buffer tube can only be made so short before reliability suffers.
     
  14. Mobuck

    Mobuck member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    285
    I've shot a scoped AR "pistol" with a 11.5" barrel that was just as accurate as a rifle from a benchrest. For most uses, the rifle caliber pistols are obnoxiously loud, produce a monumental muzzle flash, and aren't especially handy to carry. Mine(equipped with high output light and laser) hangs above my bed in case of a Zombie assault(or similar multiplayer invasion). Carried by a single point sling, the AR pistol or AK Krinkov provide overwhelming firepower compared to a handgun.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page