Carrying the K6

Status
Not open for further replies.
975509cb-a222-4a2e-9106-cac0242793a9_1.9a29cdb98503a331f4273480850d5e93.jpeg
Thanks! They make a universal version that attaches with some type of adhesive. That maybe an option.
I did a little research and the only one available is the tape on version. I think the solvents from Hoppes and the like would dissolve the adhesive eventually. I did find them for an LCR. They're available, but as I feared.. some drilling and tapping is required. I'd have to think long and hard on that one. I guess now I'll have to get a S&W "J" frame. LOL
 
Last edited:
View attachment 890505
I did a little research and the only one available is the tape on version. I think the solvents from Hoppes and the like would dissolve the adhesive eventually. I did find them for an LCR. They're available, but as I feared.. some drilling and tapping is required. I'd have to think long and hard on that one. I guess now I'll have to get a S&W "J" frame. LOL
Now you are cooking with Crisco!
 
I haven't had the pleasure of handling a K6. How do they compare in size to a SP101 or Colt Cobra? Anyone got a pic that compares them side by side? I've saw a couple of K6's that kinda look nice but haven't actually handled one. I was cautiously awaiting some reviews as this was Kimbers first revolver.
 
Kleanbore is the OP and he does not care to post pics, which is his right. That doesn't stop others from posting pics of their Kimbers with their holsters.

When I went back and forth with Kleanbore on posting pics I didn't realize he was the OP and speaking for himself. No one has to post pics.

Others can and that's up to them.
 
Nice comparison. As far as looks go that model of Kimber they used is butt ugly. I have observed a few that look better than that one.

I was looking for snub-nose, 6 shot, brushed stainless, .357, decent sights, hammerless, and snag-free. Somehow, this combination isn't easy to find. TBH, if it has those attributes, I wouldn't have cared if it looked like bat poo. But, as 9mmepiphany stated,
the two tone is not a more handsome version of the K6.
 
I did not take it as rudeness.

I simply do not post files i have created when I cannot tell what data remain in them and what do not, and what may be decipherable by others.

It's a personal thing. Camera and photo management software are so complex that I find them daunting--not like silver halide.

I am happy that Driftwood Johnson feels otherwise.


Perhaps you could take a picture and then screen-shot said picture to guarantee that any residual data that may be in the background can be removed. If your concern is of embedded information then resizing the image and compressing the file size should disrupt the embedded info enough to make it useless. I understand your position, but I offer this as a potential workaround.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top