Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CCI #34 primers

Discussion in 'Handloading and Reloading' started by GarandOwner, Apr 17, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. GarandOwner

    GarandOwner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    537
    Location:
    Florida
    Does anyone know of a place online that has CCI #34 primers in stock? I cant seem to find any and I need some to reload for my Garand.
     
  2. dmftoy1

    dmftoy1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    Lexington, IL
  3. ReloaderFred

    ReloaderFred Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2005
    Messages:
    5,936
    Location:
    Oregon Coast
    They had some at Sportsman's Warehouse in Salem, OR, the last time I was there. In fact, CCI primers were all they had.

    Hope this helps.

    Fred
     
  4. WayneConrad

    WayneConrad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,128
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I think I got mine from Graf & Sons, a ways back. I think these are the critters.

    I forget... are primers hazmat of some kind, or do they get shipped normally?
     
  5. LotI

    LotI Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    America's Dairyland
    I was just at Recob's yesterday and they had them on the shelf...which means they probably have tons in the warehouse.

    They are knee deep in CCI since that's what's available right now.
     
  6. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    11,374
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    Regular large rifle primers will work just fine. CCI #34 primers are a marketing gimmick. They're just a magnum primer. Mind you, you'll have to work up the load again.
     
  7. WayneConrad

    WayneConrad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,128
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I've got at least one reloading manual with a strong caution that the NATO spec primers must be used in firearms with floating firing pins, specifically mentioning CCI #34. I ain't saying you're wrong, but I'd sure like to know what you have to back that up before I ignore that caution.

    So are you saying that the CCI #34 aren't NATO spec? They're no harder than usual?
     
  8. Jacka L Ope

    Jacka L Ope Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    382
    Location:
    Washington State
    The CCI #34 "Arsenal Primer", which the ballistic equivalent to the CCI #250 Magnum primer, is designed specifically for 7.62mm NATO, 30-06 and 7.62 x 39mm ammo due primer sensitivity is a more important consideration in military autoloading rifles than in bolt or single shot rifles. Mil-spec or equivalent primers have thicker or harder cups, a military type priming mixture and lower overall sensitivity.
     
  9. LotI

    LotI Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2005
    Messages:
    228
    Location:
    America's Dairyland
    Sources please?
     
  10. WayneConrad

    WayneConrad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,128
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    For reference, here is the warning reference CCI #34 primers, from Speer Number 13, p. 331:
     
  11. GarandOwner

    GarandOwner Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2006
    Messages:
    537
    Location:
    Florida
    I read that the #34 isnt harder than a regular primer, it just as the anvil seated farther back so that it is less likely to ignite due to lighter impacts. I have used regular rifle primers before with no problem, but for the same price, it gives added security. Its not that using regular primers will cause a slam fire, its just that by using #34's it reduces the chance further.
     
  12. Jacka L Ope

    Jacka L Ope Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2007
    Messages:
    382
    Location:
    Washington State
    From the CCI website FAQ:

    http://www.cci-ammunition.com/education/faq.aspx

    Another snip from Speer Number 13, p. 37:

    The "discussion" referred to in Jerry Kuhnhausen's shop manual is an extensive, in-detail 20 pages worth of information that I'm not even going to attempt to reprint here due to its length not to mention copyright. Suffice to say that he does mention CCI #34 & 41 primers, and states that mil-spec or military equivalent primers should be used in reloaded cartridges for use in military auto loading rifles.

    In the gun and gunsmith world, the name of Jerry Kuhnhausen speaks of itself. If someone would like to take a shot at knocking his knowledge and experience as a "marketing gimmick", give it your very best. ;)

    All said and done, to each their own reloading bench, ammunition, firearms, fun and risk of life and limb.

    Cheers! beerchug.gif
     
    Last edited: Apr 18, 2008
  13. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    Not to poke sticks at Kuhnhausen, but his lawyer has to eat just like everyone else's who publishes load data.

    I've shot upwards to 10k WLR primers and about 3k Rem primers through the M1 and M1a. I don't think the #34 primer is necessary, but the risk of slamfire is out there and measures of some type should be taken to avoid it.
     
  14. zxcvbob

    zxcvbob Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,061
    Location:
    S.E. Minnesota
    You mean I got screwed when I bought a case of 'em for $75 when I could have bought regular LR or LRM primers for $100? (powdervalleyinc about a month or two ago)
     
  15. Wiljen

    Wiljen Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2007
    Messages:
    46
    I think the mil-spec primers are a good suggestion in Military rifles that are owned by the military and treated as such.

    For most of us, getting our beloved M1 or M1a full of mud and failing to clean it is not very likely. Slam fires in these weapons are a result of a non-rebounding firing pin (no spring). If cleaned and well taken care of, the pin shouldn't stick in the forward position and cause a problem. I shot Remington and Federal match primers in my Garand for years shooting NM and never once had or saw anyone who had a slamfire on the line. I suspect care of the weapons makes a huge difference in the likelihood of that problem.
     
  16. Peter M. Eick

    Peter M. Eick Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    5,035
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    Your analysis of the problem is reasonable. It is weapon dependent or at least that is my opinion also.

    So now we are faced with a quandary.

    Do I buy c-34's and not-risk having my rifle blow up in my face because I don't want to pay extra for a less sensitive primer and I am so sure I am right that I am willing to risk it?

    Or do I buy standard rifle primers and hope that my rifle does not require C-34's?


    Interesting problem isn't it. Sort of like the lottery, if you know you are going to win, they don't call it gambling, it is investing. Unfortunately, most of us are forced to gamble.


    Me, I shoot c-34's and never look back. I read the books, I read the information that Speer and Springfield put out on slam fires and figured "why risk it".

    [​IMG]

    At 100 yards off the bench, my Supermatch does not seem to have a problem putting 50 shots in a row in a reasonable group. Thus I am not too concerned about any downsides to c-34's and am happy for the peace of mind they give me.

    "you pay your money and take your chances" so to speak.
     
  17. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    I'm going with 'marketing gimmic' myself.

    A lot of 'milspec' products are common everyday products that happen to have gone through the proper bureaucratic channels to get qualified as an item that can be purchased through .gov contracts. Just like any other mall ninja gear, 'milspec' will command a higher price that some people will be more willing to pay (just ask any Colt owner).

    I've used the No. 34 primers, but I've found better loads using WLR primers for the M1 and have shot through more than 1K of them without a problem.


    And yes reloading manuals need to cover their butts. They don't want to be blamed is some dope seats their WLR primers high and has a slamfire- at least with the 'milspec' primers they can cicle back and say- "see it wasn't the primer's fault that it went off."
     
  18. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,791
    Location:
    Alabama
    You can always call CCI at 800-627-3640 1, 1, and talk to the technical guy. I called CCI when their "Mil Spec" primers first came out on the market. I asked them about the sensitivity of the primers and was told that these were originally part of their military product line. They brought them on the market after the Clinton primer scare.

    The CCI rep told me that this product line is less sensitive ("harder") than the commerical line and that these are magnum level primers.

    When Winchester changed their product line in 1999, I called them and was told that the new brass finish primers are more sensitive.

    Of course they all could be lying, and it could all be a marketing gimmick. But I don't see why they would be. After all there is a group of people who want less sensitive primers, and there is a group who want extremely sensitive primers.

    The "extremely sensitive" primer group is primarily composed of "spring changers". These folks swap out mainsprings to get the lightest possible trigger pull and then blame the primer when the gun does not go off.

    As to primer sensitive, there is a two level drop test which is used to lot test primer. The low height is called the H-2s and I think it corresponds to "none fire". And the high height, H + 5S, is the "all fire"

    I recommend finding George E. Frost's book “Ammunition Making” for a good description and procedure for calculating the sensitivity numbers in a primer test. According to his book, Of interest, the H – 2S (two standard deviations) means that 4 primers in 900 would be expected to fire, and H + 5S means 3 in 10, 000, 000 primers are expected to misfire. So it can be seen that even at the lowest drop, there is a probability of ignition.

    (If I have garbled this, someone please clarify)

    That is why, in a gas gun with a free floating firing pin, it is important to use a less sensitive "hard” primer to reduce the chance of an out of battery slamfire.

    I have had two slamfires with Garands, using Federal primers, one slamfire blew the back of the receiver off. I have talked to others who have had slamfires. All with Federal primers and Garands. One guy had an M1a slamfire with Federal primers. Folks don't like being labled as stupid accident prone gits, and so they don't go around broadcasting their accidents. You really have to dig in a non judgemental way to discover these things.

    And, I use CCI #34's in my Garands and M1a's. They shoot just fine.

    This target of ten shots, was shot at 100 yards in practice, prone with a sling, using the iron sights on one of my match Garands. I have not had any problems with the accuracy from CCI #34 primers.

    M1Garand30-06168Nosler47.jpg
     
  19. dmftoy1

    dmftoy1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    Lexington, IL
    I was going with the "BS" route myself on Saturday . . . .after all it had never happened to me over 2500 rounds of 30-06 and .223 . . .on Sunday my mind was changed.

    I was shooting the ISRA's Garand Match yesterday and a guy was there with a nice Service Grade Garand. Looked to me to have been very well maintained. He was shooting "American Eagle" factory 30-06 loads. (150 grain, FMJ) and in the Offhand Slow fire stage (single loading, no clips) he had a slam fire just releasing the bolt. Scared the bejesus out of the guy shooting. (I had finished, cleared my gun and was sitting back and watching the guys who were smart enough to have not rushed like did. :) )

    Just my .02

    Regards,
    Dave
     
  20. Slamfire

    Slamfire Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2006
    Messages:
    7,791
    Location:
    Alabama
    Interesting, and it happened with factory ammunition.

    I assume the slamfire was in battery, because if it was an out of battery slamfire, he could have blown the back of the receiver off and there would have been significant damage to the rifle.

    So, how does it feel to read all the posts which say slamfires are "BS", and yet, you saw one?
     
  21. strat81

    strat81 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,912
    Location:
    Nebraska
    I've used a few hundred CCI Large Rifle Primers in M43 reloads fired through my AK with no problems. I'd prefer the arsenal primers, but I couldn't find any at the time. I just make sure to seat them below the rim and take care to clean the bolt well after using.

    I'm using #41 primers for my AR reloading and they're fine. No additional cost over regular magnum primers.

    YMMV.
     
  22. cracked butt

    cracked butt Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    6,986
    Location:
    SE Wisconsin
    Federal primers are well known to be 'soft' or 'sensitive' I won't use them in an autoloader.

    For singleloaded slamfires- there's a reason for 'SLEDS' or at the very least riding the bolt handle 1/2 way down when a round isn't chambered from a clip or magazine.
     
  23. 30Cal

    30Cal Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    Albany, NY
    I don't shoot them, but mountains of FedGMM has been fired through M1a's over the years. That's supposedly the most sensitive primer available.
     
  24. WayneConrad

    WayneConrad Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2005
    Messages:
    2,128
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Very nice shooting, and done properly and not from a bench. Very apropos nick.
     
  25. dmftoy1

    dmftoy1 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    2,213
    Location:
    Lexington, IL
    Yup, as far as I can tell he was in battery when it fired. He wasn't slamming the bolt forward but I'm sure he was just nudging it and letting it put it home.

    he had the muzzle slightly depressed and so the round went into the ground about 20-30 feet in front of the line.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page