Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CCSF Police Chief Quits Over Gun Policy

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Telperion, Jun 8, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Telperion

    Telperion Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,482
    Location:
    Oregon
    More lessons not learned. The swords must be destroyed.


    http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=5376569

    Jun. 7 - KGO - The police chief at City College of San Francisco has resigned over a question of security. He wanted his officers to be able to carry guns on campus, especially in light of a recent incident, but he was overruled.

    In late April, 52-year-old Peter Lee rushed into a classroom in the science building, dressed in camouflage. Students say he threatened to kill everyone. But campus police had to wait until S.F.P.D. arrived before they could respond. That's because campus cops don't carry guns -- only pepper spray and batons.

    Fortunately, Lee was not armed either and they arrested him without incident.

    Since last year, City College Police Chief Carl Koehler has been lobbying the administration to allow his officers to carry guns.

    Carl Koehler, CCSF Police Chief: "In this day and age, there are guns on campus, but the police don't have them."

    The carnage at Virginia Tech convinced Chief Koehler even more that his officers need to be armed. But he was fighting a 70-year-old college policy prohibiting its officers from carrying guns.

    In the end, Chief Koehler lost. He resigned this week.

    He said in an e-mail to his officers, "the reasons are many, but mainly evolve around my proposal to arm the district police officers."

    Peter Goldstein, CCSF Vice Chancellor: "The police force does not carry weapons... I guess he felt that ultimately didn't fit in with his vision of where the department should be."

    Koehler was unavailable for comment. His officers declined to talk on camera. Privately, they told us they're angry and frustrated. But the administration has no intention of changing policy.

    ABC7's Vic Lee: "So it's a dead issue?"

    Peter Goldstein: "At this point, I'd say unless the board of trustees wishes to consider it, it's not an issue for the college."

    So, City College police will continue patrolling this campus unarmed, protected only by their bulletproof vests.​
     
  2. Pilgrim

    Pilgrim Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,957
    Location:
    Nevada, escaped from the PDRK via Idaho.
    He's to be honored for standing on principle.

    Pilgrim
     
  3. Titan6

    Titan6 member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,745
    Location:
    Gillikin Country
    That took some guts once he came around. You have to hand it to him. I hope he gets another job soon.
     
  4. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,212
    Note to self: Do not apply to City College of San Francisco!

    Doc2005 (Grad Prof)
     
  5. pacodelahoya

    pacodelahoya Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    SW PA
    Kudos to him. Willing to stand up for his principals. If everyone did that, we would have, no more no knock warrants, no more patriot acts, no more double standards.






    Hey, a guy can dream can't he?:)
     
  6. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    Its good that he stood up for his beliefs. But I would take the view that if students cant legally carry there then I dont think police should be able to.
     
  7. pacodelahoya

    pacodelahoya Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2007
    Messages:
    911
    Location:
    SW PA
    And I would have to agree with you (as I'm sure you already know).
     
  8. langenc

    langenc Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Messages:
    949
    Location:
    Montmorency Co, MI
    "Bullet proof vests" and no guns!! Isnt that ridiculous.
     
  9. Car Knocker

    Car Knocker Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    3,809
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    I wonder why the administration would require the officers to wear "bulletproof vests" if the campus is a gun-free zone? :evil:
     
  10. Eightball

    Eightball Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    4,257
    Location:
    Louisville, KY
    I hope he finds employment at a more "friendly" place nearby.
     
  11. Valkman

    Valkman Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2003
    Messages:
    6,703
    Location:
    North Las Vegas, NV
    If it's been that way for 70 years it must be The Way, right?

    Some whackjob will walk in kill 10 and they still won't change it. And if they did they'd have the whole anti city come down on them to change back. Guns are bad and that's the way it is.
     
  12. obxned

    obxned Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2007
    Messages:
    1,490
    Location:
    OBX, NC
    Carl Koehler, CCSF Police Chief, shows an accurate grasp of the situation. Too bad he's leaving.

    So why issue bullet-proof vests if there are no guns on campus? The lawyers are going to have a field day with that whenever a shooting occurs on that campus. How can people who's business is education be so freakn stupid?
     
  13. Mannix

    Mannix Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2007
    Messages:
    593
    Well, this seems like a perfect "gun-free" zone for another VT to happen, but I pray to god it doesn't turn out like that. VT is what made me change from fence sitter to pro RKBA, guess the anti folks are just more hard headed than others. Good for him for standing up for his principles, and that's one more(like I really needed another :rolleyes: ) reason not to go to school in the PRK.
     
  14. rhubarb

    rhubarb Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2005
    Messages:
    765
    Location:
    South Texas
    If there's a violent person around, the police have to call 911? Why is California such a caricature of leftist stupidity?

    At least it's fair. Normal citizens can't have guns and police can't either. It'd prevent a lot of deaths if SWAT teams carried only pepper spray and batons.
     
  15. thexrayboy

    thexrayboy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2006
    Messages:
    1,324
    Location:
    northern nevada
    Ah yes San Franfreako, the city by the bay. It has devolved into a bowl of granola. What ain't fruits and nuts are just plain flakes.

    At least this LEO has some principles. Rare to see a chief LEO who will buck the powers that be and then tell them to get stuffed when they persist in displaying insane behavior. He should have no trouble finding gainful employement once he leaves the land of make believe and good feelings.
     
  16. yokel

    yokel Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2007
    Messages:
    1,193
    Attitudes there towards self-defense starkly reveal how poorly rights are understood.

    PC groupthink apparently trumps the imperative toward survival and self-preservation.:uhoh:
     
  17. ilbob

    ilbob Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2006
    Messages:
    12,319
    Location:
    Illinois
    I see no reason to allow cops to carry guns if I cannot.

    My life is worth every bit as much as their's is.
     
  18. QuestionEverything

    QuestionEverything Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    178
    He's to be admired? I like CCSF's gun policy better than the ones in place at schools that let cops have guns while students go disarmed. If students can't carry, I don't see why cops should be able to. Of course, in SF there's no way a student could get a permit unless they're the child of an actor or politician.
     
  19. larry_minn

    larry_minn Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    1,455
    Location:
    Minnesota
    In the early 80s I worked security at a major University that did NOT allow us to carry ANYTHING that was remotely considered a weapon. (we were supposed to leave pocket knives in our cars) Not that many yrs before they ISSUED guns. (.38 revolvers) with NO training. :( :(
    So can anyone guess what happened? Yep a (guard) was playing with his gun (he said he was cleaning it) the gun "went off" :0 and almost hit a staff person.
    So because "One time" a idiot WAS a idiot none of us could be armed. (no matter our training)
    I only carried twice. Once a gun I (conficated but gave back a few days later as the person was not a threat just stupid) The other was my own gun as I had a incident with two gents who had knives and promised to come back and get me.
     
  20. Autolycus

    Autolycus Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    5,456
    Location:
    In the land of make believe.
    I do agree but it is nice to see a political figure stand up for his beliefs. Either way I understand the sentiment and I agree with you. But finding someone to actually follow through with their ideas and beliefs is rare.
     
  21. eric_t12

    eric_t12 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    172
    Location:
    SD
    I'm glad for him, standing up for himself and his officers most importantly.

    i would have liked to have him ask about why the PEOPLE can't carry weapons on campus... since -

    "there are guns on campus, but the police don't have them."

    well let's see, the police don't have them, WE don't have them... who has them?

    criminals, eh? a fair answer...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page