I owned a pair of the original Bulldogs, blued & stainless.
Never really pleased with functioning & accuracy of either. (Part of the accuracy problem was reportedly the older 200gr STHP bullet design, though, to be fair, but the LSWCHP loads never really seemed to produce outstanding practical accuracy, either.)
I tend to think their QC was a bit unpredictable.
I really wanted to keep the stainless one, but after the third time it was "repaired" by the factory for the cylinder seizing up (in both dry & live fire conditions), I removed it from the box after the latest factory repair and it seized during dry-fire before making it all the way around the cylinder. I traded it into the shop who had done the shipping & receiving for me, and who apparently had a very bored gunsmith who wanted a project gun ... and didn't revisit CA revolvers again.
I have no idea what the latest incarnation of the guns are like, nor am I interested in finding out. I tend to like a more robust design than that offered by the CA guns (and some of the other inexpensive revolvers, for that matter).
I know a couple of other guys who owned and carried .44 Bulldogs over the years, but neither of them did any serious practice with them. Carried a lot and seldom fired for practice. I tried to use mine fairly frequently, though.
I feel S&W and Ruger offers enough models to suit my own needs.
Sure, the nostalgic streak in me still feels like a .44 Spl snub would be a nice wheelgun to own, but it doesn't appeal to my practical perspective any longer. That's just me, though.