Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Cheap; long-range; high velocity gopher cartridge

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by Lucky, Nov 22, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lucky

    Lucky Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,919
    Location:
    Calgary, near Rocky Mountains - Canada
    What's the best option? I see a sea of various cartridges, what's the one that's the best bang for the buck? If it comes to reloading I can do that too. But I want one I can shoot a lot, that will reach out hopefully 500m, and it'd be a bonus if it's common enough to be available. I suppose the higher velocity ones will probably require frequent barrel changes, so that's a factor in cost.

    Afaik I can't reload rimfire on my press, and I haven't had the best reliability with them in cold weather. But I'm not closing the door to them, in fact there are legal advantages to RF over CF.

    What do you guys have?
     
  2. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
  3. gvnwst

    gvnwst Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,614
    Location:
    Somewhere.........
    .22-250 or .243. it is not possible to reload rimfire, at all. No rimfire will go 500 accurately anyhow.
     
  4. Lucky

    Lucky Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,919
    Location:
    Calgary, near Rocky Mountains - Canada
    Thanks, 22-250 looked popular, but why's it better than 22hornet or 22ruger?
     
  5. Eyesac

    Eyesac Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    1,393
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    Um... 223? Cheap + high velocity + great for gophers...
     
  6. gvnwst

    gvnwst Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2008
    Messages:
    2,614
    Location:
    Somewhere.........
    At 500yd, the .223 does not have the velocity to 'blow up' on varmints.

    I do not know what the .22 Ruger is (maybe you meant .204 ruger?), but the hornet cant go to 500 either.
     
  7. 7.62X25mm

    7.62X25mm member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2008
    Messages:
    313
    22-250 is a notorious barrel burner!

    Most any necked-down 22 cal in extreme high velocity is going to erode the leade in a barrel. That's just physics.
     
  8. dirtyjim

    dirtyjim Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    1,152
    Location:
    alvin texas
    220 swift. most of the br shooters are getting well over 1500 rounds out of the barrels before setting them back. let the barrel cool & it will last a long time.
     
  9. Floppy_D

    Floppy_D Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2007
    Messages:
    2,156
    Location:
    NAS Pensacola
    223 is an easy answer. Price 22-250 compared to 223, for shiggles. 223 pierces body armor to 700m, do you suppose it will work out to 500m?

    22-250 is a hotter cartridge, albeit more expensive. The answer belongs to you... do you need that extra boost around 4-500 meters? I'd suggest learning your drops at various distances, and getting familiar with your optics. 223 can do the job, you just need to learn it's parameters.
     
  10. IdahoLT1

    IdahoLT1 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    I use my Savage 10FP chambered in .308 for varmint shooting. A 150gr .30cal bullet will be effected alot less by the wind compared to a 40gr .22cal bullet. So longer distances like 500yds might be more suitable for a heavier bullet. Not only that, but you can also buy mil surplus ammo for the .308, to help reduce the cost or be able to shoot more. just my $.02
     
  11. Auburn1992

    Auburn1992 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,015
    Location:
    Tennessee
    You could go all day shooting a 2-250. You would be sore after after like 40 rds of that 308.


    Plus, the 22 hornet is better suited for inside 250 yards, the 22-250 has better bunch (pretty significant) than a 223 at 500m.

    As well, the 22-250 really doesn't cost too much more than the 223... maybe a dollar

    As for barrel burning, you're not going to burn out a barrel past the point of hitting your target, generally. Unless your looking to keep those .5" groupings, just keep the same barrel until it gets way outta hand.
     
  12. sortie

    sortie Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    if there is NO and I mean no wind it can be done but even a .5mph wind and you can forget about it.

    I say get a 223 and be done with it
     
  13. IdahoLT1

    IdahoLT1 Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2008
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Boise, Idaho
    Not really. I have shot 120 rounds while shooting whislte pigs, on an afternoon. I usually shoot ~90 rounds and that will last 3-4 hours. Im more tired from holding the gun up and being sunburned than my shoulder is being sore from shooting. 110gr vmax's will do nasty things to a whistle pig and isnt hard on the shoulder at all.
     
  14. RonE

    RonE Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2007
    Messages:
    696
    Location:
    Rockport, Texas
    I would suggest the .223 or perhaps get a rifle and chamber it for 5.45X39mm. There is surplus ammo that comes close to the .223 velocities for about ten or eleven cents a round.

    If it was me though, I would get a .220 swift....Sadly, we have few ground squirrels and similar varmints here in South Texas.
     
  15. rust collector

    rust collector Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,049
    Location:
    Pierre, SD USA
    When price is a factor, the 223 is hard to beat. For more oomph, the 22-250 is a fine cartridge, but you will pay a lot more for brass and a bit more for powder. 220 swift is wretched excess, but some live for that.
     
  16. Girodin

    Girodin Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2008
    Messages:
    5,550
    Surplus 5.45x39 is probably not going to produce the type of accuracy one is after to shoot P dogs and the like at five hundred yards.

    .223 is the winner on price as others have said. When I last priced new brass it was around 12 dollars per hundred cheaper for the .223 than the .22-250. I still like the 22-250 more however. If the difference in ammo price is not a huge concern it would be my pick.
     
  17. SpeedAKL

    SpeedAKL Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,027
    Location:
    McLean, VA
    .223

    Looking for a bolt gun or semi-auto? Lots of choices out there either way.
     
  18. Lucky

    Lucky Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,919
    Location:
    Calgary, near Rocky Mountains - Canada
    Very cool then, .223 has it, others sound better but time to quote Voltaire "Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien."

    Now for a tricky bit - is there any way I can get it in a 700, long action, so later I could use the action for .338's?
     
  19. Sunray

    Sunray Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2003
    Messages:
    10,795
    Location:
    London, Ont.
    "...can't reload rimfire on my press..." Not on any press.
    "...22-250 is a notorious barrel burner!..." Who told you that nonsense?
    "... get it in a 700, long action..." No. .223 Rem 700's don't come in a long magnum action. There are other cartridges based on the .223 though. The 6mm x 45, for example.
    A .223 is not a 500 meter cartridge. A 69 grain Remington factory bullet sighted in at 200 drops 45.4" at 500 and has 473 ft-lbs of energy. A 90 grain .243 isn't much better.
    In any case, a gopher at 500 yards is smaller than this. '.' Hitting something that small takes a heavy barreled, bolt action, varmint rifle with carefully loaded ammo and a whole bunch of wind reading skill. Mind you, there's not many beasties that can teach you how to stalk as well. Every predator eats gophers and they know it. Makes 'em very wary. Being able to get close enough to kill 'em with a .22 is an extremely valuable hunting skill.
    Please join us at http://www.canadiangunnutz.com/forum/
     
  20. JimmAr

    JimmAr Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    223 works around to 300-400 yards..

    If your serious about 500m I would get the 25-06 or the 243..long barrel life..high velocity..reloaded cheapish..
     
  21. lev83

    lev83 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    22-250 would be my first choice. But i would not overlook a good value on a rifle in .223, 25-06, or .243. The .270 can also be an excellent varmint gun but is a little more expensive to shoot.
     
  22. rodregier

    rodregier Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,676
    Location:
    Halifax,NS Canada
    If you want to do a lot of shooting, .223 Rem is the answer. Moderate your outer distance specification to something like 300yd and .223 Rem will do the trick. An action well-suited to .223 Rem won't fit the larger cartridges. You'll have to buy a separate rifle for that. A Savage Model 10 bolt gun chambered in .223 Rem is good value for the money. There are others.
     
  23. Afy

    Afy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2006
    Messages:
    2,595
    .260
     
  24. NCsmitty

    NCsmitty Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,325
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Doping range is much easier with a 22-250 or lighter bullets in the 243. The 223 is good for 300 yds or so unless you have specialized equipment, and it's only advantage is availability of surplus practice ammo and components. :)
    A 22-250 barrel will often outlast the owner so that should not be a concern. Use of ball powders may hasten throat erosion, so be advised.

    NCsmitty
     
  25. rust collector

    rust collector Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    1,049
    Location:
    Pierre, SD USA
    Returning to your original post...

    You are talking about 22 rimfire as if you don't own one currently. Most have killed more gophers and small varmints with the rf than anything else by far, and it is essential for building skills. If you don't have a good, accurate rimfire rifle, I'd sure recommend starting there. Cost is miniscule.

    Next up would be a varmint gun, if you don't hunt larger game such as deer. If it might be used for deer, or for very long distances, you'll be happier with the 6, 6.5 or 7mm rounds. For shorter distances and small game only, the preceding recommendations are good ones

    If cost is a factor, you won't be shooting 338s. The gun you will want for that would be significantly different in respects other than the barrel. Once you have many rounds' experience, you will have a better idea of the specifics (or desirability).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page