Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Cheap scopes and mounts, who has them?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by SIGfiend, Sep 20, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SIGfiend

    SIGfiend Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    286
    Hi guys, I'm trying to find some high-end $100-$150 scopes. Can you please list names of sites that sell quality names like Leapers for below market prices. Of course I want it to be for a brand new product. Thanks!
     
  2. Lennyjoe

    Lennyjoe Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,069
    Location:
    Southwestern Ohio
  3. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,682
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    Not to be snob by any means, but..

    Isn't that a bit of an oxymoron? :confused: IMO, if you want a decent $150 scope, buy a used Nikon/Burris/Sightron on eBay or AuctionArms.
     
  4. waterhouse

    waterhouse Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2005
    Messages:
    4,300
    Location:
    Round Rock, TX
    I'm with rbernie on this one. Almost every scope I own is a leupold or Sightron, both great companies, and they were all bought used on ebay or through exchange boards of forums like this one. A lot of time you can get what was a retail $230 sightron for $140 used, and they work just as well as the new ones.

    So my suggestions for a good website would be ebay.
     
    Last edited: Sep 20, 2005
  5. USSR

    USSR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2005
    Messages:
    8,581
    Location:
    Finger Lakes Region of NY
    You have been given some good advice. There are no "high-end $100-$150 scopes". Buy a used scope if you cannot afford new. You get what you pay for in optics.

    Don
     
  6. SIGfiend

    SIGfiend Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 2004
    Messages:
    286
  7. Cindog

    Cindog Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2003
    Messages:
    199
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    If you must go cheap, then go Swift. Just be sure you stick to one of their Premiere grade scopes. A little more but still less than Leupold, Sightron, etc. is a Mueller.
     
  8. Soap

    Soap Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    3,735
    +1 to what USSR said.
     
  9. Essex County

    Essex County Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2005
    Messages:
    1,247
    Although I own some leupolds..........

    I have a couple of "default" scopes that I go to for project guns (it seems I always have going on). For a fixed Weaver's K series is hard to beat. I just mounted a K-6 this morning. To kick it up a little, in a variable I think the Bushnell 3200's are great. Anytime I've gone cheaper I've had regrets........... Essex
     
  10. MachIVshooter

    MachIVshooter Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2005
    Messages:
    14,848
    Location:
    Elbert County, CO
    +1

    There are, however, some "good" scopes in the $150-$200 range, such as the Nikon Prostaff or Buckmaster 3-9x. The Simmons ATV and Aetec also fall into this category. I have a Nikon Prostaff 3-9x on a Ruger .280 and a Simmons ATV 4.5-14x on my G-3. For a little more, you can get a Leupold Vx-II 3-9x (~$250). Decent Burris and Weaver scopes become available over $250. I have a Remington 700 LVSF .17 Rem. with a Weaver Classic V16 4-16x 42mm fine reticle 1/8 MOA dot (the fine reticle is not a good choice for big game hunting, though).

    IMO, a variable 3-9x, 3.5-10x, 4-12x, 4.5-14x or 4-16x with an objective lens between 36 and 42mm and a duplex crosshair is best for hunting. Anything that starts at higher than 4.5x magnification really limits your field of view. And you should never need more than 16x on any antelope, deer or elk at a reasonble distance. Objective lenses under 36mm make low-light shots more difficult. 30mm tubes and 50mm objectives offer great light gathering, but require mounting much higher above boreline, thus creating more confusing and radical trajectory/line of sight.

    There is a reason that 1" tubed, 32-40mm 3-9x scopes have been the standard for the last half-century.
     
  11. greg531mi

    greg531mi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    611
    Location:
    MI
    Since Bushnell bought Tasco, the Tasco line has improved. I bought the World Class 3x9x40, was surprised what I got for $29.95....It made the Simmons, Barsaka's, Leapers, and other under $100 scopes l looked through, look like junk, compared to the World Class. It seems they improved it, and I think, it is a good value. The older ones were junk, but the new W.C. are clearer and brighter than anything else in the price range. Don't get the pronghorn, or low priced Bushnells.
    The best thing to do, is to go to the sporting goods store, and look through them and compare, that is what I did....,
     
  12. ajax

    ajax Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    396
    Location:
    Fairview Heights,Illinois
    Go nikon best bang for the buck in that price range because there is nothin good about leapers.
     
  13. kirkcdl

    kirkcdl Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2004
    Messages:
    708
    Location:
    ORYGUN
    My guess is that what you want is the top models of a lower priced brand of scopes.Try www.cdnninvestments.com

    You might also check out www.kalinkaoptics.com Russian optice are the best value on the market,US dollars go a long way in Russia these days.Good Luck...
     
  14. gulogulo1970

    gulogulo1970 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2003
    Messages:
    862
    Location:
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Simmons Aetec

    I have a couple of Simmons 2.9X10X44mm Aetecs on my 300 Weatherby and a 308 Savage 99 and could not be more impressed with their ability to hold zero shot after shot, year after year.

    Great value for the money. They haven't given me a reason not to like them.
     
  15. Geno
    • Contributing Member

    Geno Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2005
    Messages:
    15,276
    Depends on what and where one hunts

    When I used to hunt the open MI bean fields with my .30 Wea, I used Leupold 3.5-10 and 4.5-14. Then, I switched to a Wea. Mark V in .270 Win and limited my shots to 300 yards or less. For that, a simple Tasco 4X was awesome. I never had to rezero. I know...extreme choice, but so was the distance varience extreme.

    Now, I hunt with pistol only...my next and final point...do NOT overlook the T/C scopes...they are strong, take a beating and do not lose zero. Finally, they are right for your price range. T/C does make both pistol and rifle scopes, I think in the following powers: 1X; 4X and 3X-9X, both standard and illuminated.

    http://www.tcarms.com/

    Doc2005
     
  16. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,682
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    My Simmons AETEC was just plain crap for repeatability. It'd not LOSE zero so much as it wouldn't adjust to the same place if you needed to switch zero betwen different loads.
     
  17. IThunter

    IThunter Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2005
    Messages:
    83
    Location:
    Indiana
    i am also a firm believer in you get what you pay for when it comes to scopes...my bushnell sportsviews is dark and gray when compaired to my new Nikon Buckmaster...and the only reason i have the bushnell is because it was on the rifle when i bought it.
     
  18. MAUSER88

    MAUSER88 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2004
    Messages:
    664
    Location:
    NJ
    Maybe a little more than you want to spend, but the Bushnell 3200 Elite is a real nice scope at just under $200.00 Cheaper Than Dirt had them in stock and for a good price.
     
  19. rockstar.esq

    rockstar.esq Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,475
    Totally Controversial Opinion

    Unlike the otheres here, I won't flog you for not foregoing your meals for a month in order to have the Uber tacticool future vision scope. However I do belive that once you experience the cream of the crop, the humble offerings are much less stimulating. Clarity and adjustability are the two most obvious differences one will likely notice. That said. I for one absolutely hate this trend where every hunting rifle must be equipped with adjustable turrets capable of allowing you to "shoot the square" ad nauseum. The price points on scopes with rangefinding functions are abnoxiously high. It seems that in order to make a shot one must have the hottest magnum chambering with a high power scope that get's "dialed in" only after laser rangefinding down to the nanometer! If you have the personal restraint and patience to establish a zero with your rifle and a given load. I believe you can hit just as well without bankruptcy. If you think about it, there are more quality optics in your mid range cameras and their prices are often well below that of scopes who have fewer moving parts. I know that a camera doesn't have to tolerate recoil but all things considered, the quality of reticles hasn't improved nearly as much as the lens quality has. Seems to me that somewhere along the line, shooters bought into the notion that you simply must meet or exceed the cost of a rifle in order to obtain worthy optics. Precision is not the same as consistency. Everyone can shoot a one hole group with only one shot. Who cares if the "click" isn't perfectly 1/4" at 100. Most shooters can't shoot that difference offhand, many rifles couldn't do that with the rifle in a vice! I say buy what seems reasonable to you. Don't assume that an imprecise mechanism can't be relied upon for repeatability. AK's are a great example of this concept.
     
  20. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,682
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    How does our suggesting that it's better to drop $125 on a used Buckmaster or $150 on a used Monarch instead of dropping $100 on a pimped-out Leapers get you to this statement?
     
  21. The Jackal

    The Jackal Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2005
    Messages:
    77
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    Nikon and Weaver. No contest. My grandfather had a 25yr old Weaver 4x that held it's zero until one to many bangs in the back of the truck threw the front lens outa whack.

    Nikon makes a decent 3-9 for about $150 and a 2-7 for about $130.
     
  22. Dr.Rob

    Dr.Rob Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    14,885
    Location:
    Centennial, CO
    Tasco used to be a great value... leaps and bounds better than Simmons etc. I've never broken a Tasco though I've had a Weaver and Redfield fail.

    You CAN get by with an inexpensive scope, you should NOT skimp on your mounts.
     
  23. rockstar.esq

    rockstar.esq Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,475
    rbernie
    "How does our suggesting that it's better to drop $125 on a used Buckmaster or $150 on a used Monarch instead of dropping $100 on a pimped-out Leapers get you to this statement?"

    SIGfiend (Thread starter)
    "Of course I want it to be for a brand new product."

    Man wanted a new scope, and he wanted to know about getting one.
    Personally, I live over a week on $25.00 - $30.00 worth of food. Your suggestion would cost at least that and it still wouldn't be what he asked for. More to the point, the constant yammering about "you get what you pay for" is what I was responding to. I don't mind buying used equipment, in fact milsurp is the way to go in my book. SIGfiend stated that isn't what he was looking for.
     
  24. rbernie
    • Contributing Member

    rbernie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2004
    Messages:
    20,682
    Location:
    Norra Texas
    But you failed to address the truly perjorative component of your quote - "the Uber tacticool future vision" part. I'm still waiting to hear how a Buckmaster conforms to that description. :rolleyes:
     
  25. Hawkmoon

    Hawkmoon Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    3,454
    Location:
    Terra
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page