Chertoff: Mexico Troop Reports Overblown

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rusher

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
156
Location
Gaston,NC
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MEXICAN_MILITARY?SITE=FLTAM&SECTION=US


Chertoff: Mexico Troop Reports Overblown

By ELLIOT SPAGAT
Associated Press Writer

SAN DIEGO (AP) -- Reports of Mexican soldiers frequently crossing onto U.S. soil are overblown, and many of the incidents are just mistakes, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said.

Chertoff's remarks followed a newspaper report that Mexican military units had crossed into the United States 216 times since 1996. The report by the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin of Ontario on Sunday was based on a Homeland Security Department report.

Chertoff estimated there were only about 20 crossings a year, and said "a significant number of those are innocent things" in which police or military from Mexico step across the border because they're not aware of exactly where the line is.

"I think to create the image that somehow there is a deliberate effort by the Mexican military to cross the border would be to traffic in scare tactics," he said Wednesday.

Rafael Laveaga, a spokesman for the Mexican Embassy in Washington, declined to comment. He stood by earlier remarks that the Mexican military has never deliberately stepped onto U.S. soil. He declined to say if there were any unintentional crossings.

The head of a labor union that represents about 10,500 U.S. Border Patrol agents dismissed Chertoff's remarks as a "diplomatic response" to a long-running problem on the U.S.-Mexico border.

"It really doesn't surprise me that he's playing the diplomat," said T.J. Bonner, president of the National Border Patrol Council. "This is a guy whose time on the border can be measured in hours, not years."

Bonner said Mexican soldiers - possibly some Army deserters - are providing protection for drug runners.

"It's all about the drugs," he said. "The lure of the riches of the cartel, they're too many for many of their solders to resist, whether they're corrupted on active duty or take up with other bands."

Homeland Security recorded an annual average of 21.6 Mexican military incursions since the 1996 fiscal year, according to the Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Incidents peaked at 40 in 2002 and dropped to nine in the 2005 fiscal year that ended in September.

The Border Patrol's El Centro sector, which covers southeastern California, recorded the most incursions since 1996 (58), followed by Tucson, Ariz., (39), El Paso, Texas (33) and McAllen, Texas, (28), according to the newspaper. Del Rio, Texas, recorded only three incidents, the fewest of the agency's nine sectors along the southwest border.

Peter Nunez, the U.S. attorney in San Diego from 1982 to 1988, said it was difficult to know if the reports are overblown without additional information.

"Who's reporting these things?" he said. "What are the details?"

---

Associated Press writer Lara Jakes Jordan in Washington contributed to this report.
 
I love it. Well, not really.

We get a report that a foreign army has incurred upon our borders, are aiding in illegal acts and now we're being told by our own government that we don't need to worry about it? Then what exactly should I be worrying about? One politician covering for another politician, not even from the same country. But they're trying to make it that way. :barf:
 
longeyes said:
It's not a border, it's a "region"--weren't we told this a while ago? You can't violate what's not there.
Heh heh...That sounds like a defense that Johnny Cochran might present for a rapist and the analogy isn't completely inappropriate in this case, I believe.
;)
Biker
 
One thing I've learned is that people in the Bush administration never lie. I believe him.
 
odysseus said:
New title for the article - Chertoff: Nothing to see here, move along now.
That's exactly what is happening. They are hoping that a good chunk of Americans will take him at his word, and think nothing is wrong.
 
Last night at the gym they had CNN on the monitors, and the talking head was really ripping Chertoff a new one - I don't have a transcript, but he basically said that if Chertoff doesn't think armed Mexican troops repeatedly crossing the border for no good reason was no big deal, and that he wanted US Border Patrol to soft-pedal it, then that was indicative of big problems in the way he was running Homeland Security.

Again, this was on CNN, sometimes known as the Communist News Network or Clinton News Network.
 
Chertoff is either out of touch or trying to minimize the issue so the Administration doesn't look so bad. This is going to bite Bush in the *ss big time.
 
Chertoff estimated there were only about 20 crossings a year, and said "a significant number of those are innocent things" in which police or military from Mexico step across the border because they're not aware of exactly where the line is.

Maybe we should build a big wall to make it extremely obvious... I'm sure i would get the same leniency if I inadventently crossed into Canada, right? What line? I don't see any line?

idiots.
 
...but boy you better believe all those terror alerts they issue are the real thing, though...

lpl/nc (of course no self respecting terrorist would sneak across a border that leaks like a seive...)
 
Mexican army intrusions

Simple answer. lay extra large mixed type land mine fields place large amount of multiple language signage and razor wire.cover it with heavy roving military patrols then step back and see just HOW MANY accidental intrusions you see I think it would stop very quick.
 
I don't know about other states, but since my home is less than 10 miles from the Arizona/Mexico border, I'm sort of familiar with it. Every single foot of the border which I've seen has been fenced and there are signs at intervals which let you know that it's an international border.
Granted, in some areas, it's only a barbed wire fence and easily crossed, but it's still a fence.
I haven't seen many fences on the border region on the Mexico side so if you're wandering about and come to a fence, wouldn't you suspect it might be an international border? Of course you would.
"Accidental crossings" are total nonsense.
 
Bottom Gun said:
I don't know about other states, but since my home is less than 10 miles from the Arizona/Mexico border, I'm sort of familiar with it. Every single foot of the border which I've seen has been fenced and there are signs at intervals which let you know that it's an international border.p.

BG - Are you near Yuma?

Over in that area there is definitely a presence of Border Patrol and fencing throughout it.
 
Pilot said:
Chertoff is either out of touch or trying to minimize the issue so the Administration doesn't look so bad. This is going to bite Bush in the *ss big time.

He's not out of touch - the agenda is to pass the Bush guest worker plan. These little negative factoids that pop up that could impact passing this plan need to be addressed quickly - with whatever pablum the public is willing to swallow. That's Chertoff's job - he's a fireman putting out fires - and as we're learning it doesn't matter what he throws on the fire.
I don't think it'll bite Bush. His plan is going to implemented.
 
"Chertoff estimated there were only about 20 crossings a year...."

Oh, is that all? Hardly worth bothering with, is it?:cuss:
 
That's less than two per month. Oh well, at least they're "accidental".

Makes you wonder how they ever make it back home if they navigate that poorly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top