Chiappa adding RFID chips to their guns

Status
Not open for further replies.
The danger is allowing other gun manufacturers to adopt similar measures for convenience and then once they are already being used by one or more big firearm manufacturers a law being put in place requiring them and making it illegal to remove or damage them.
At which point the info required on those RFID tags will be standardized, for example per ATF specifications, which means anyone will have the means to scan for RFID tags using that format. It will become easy to scan for firearm RFID tags, and law abiding citizens will not have removed, tampered, disabled, or otherwise broken the law to interfere with them.
Such progression does not happen immediately, it is a process.
Didn't a ton of people panic over the "lawyer locks" or "Hilary holes" or whatever you want to call them? As I recall, the sky was falling and our freedoms were in clear and present danger because every gun was going to be required to have a lock manufactured into it. Look how that ended up playing out.
 
Save it for when they start putting RFID chips in guns over here.

As I understand, some HK pistols have had RFID chips in them since maybe as early as 2006.

5 years later and it turned into a non-issue until this Chiappa scandal.
 
Okay, did some more research on the RFID thing from HK, just because I was curious.

Turns out that for a while, HK offered the RFID chip as an option for Law Enforcement agencies ONLY.

The idea was, if that particular department or agency had strict enough practice and qualification policies, (IE, you WILL practice only on the department range, you WILL practice only with ammo we issue you, and you WILL fire x-number of rounds every time you practice) they could keep track of the round count of each handgun just by scanning the RFID chip each time the handgun is brought to the range to practice. The RFID wouldn't actually STORE that data, the computer software would just add a certain number of rounds to the round count in the database each time that specific RFID chip was scanned at the range.

Sig actually offered the same thing for a while, but in either case the idea was greeted with an overwhelming lack of enthusiasm, to the point that Sig apparently never produced a single handgun with an RFID chip in it, and HK dropped the idea also, and ceased to keep track of which of their handguns had RFID chips, and which did not when they were imported.
 
Sweet... Ill just hack the DB and replace the chips numbers with all of my dogs chip numbers and let whomever's watching scratch their heads... ha ha


I seriously need to keep stock in Reynolds Foil Inc.
 
We are one sour election from having our gun rights stripped. Anyone who thinks the anti-gun activists and politicians and, yes, police bureaucracies wouldn't demand RFID tracking of firearms--probably as a stepping stone to finding the guns once they've illegalized them--is MUCHO naive.
 
...anti-gun activists and politicians and, yes, police bureaucracies wouldn't demand RFID tracking of firearms...
At this point, the technology isn't there to do anything practical along these lines.

The RFID tags that will allow tracking/reading at any thing past a few inches are about as large as a typical pistol and the ones that are small enough to conceal can only be read a few inches away by any reader that could be remotely described as practical.

Chiappa made an inventory control decision, nothing more. This kind of thing only gets blown out of proportion because people don't understand the technology (and the limitations of the technology) behind the tiny RFID tags used for inventory control.
 
I don't see what the bIg deal is........because some hacker with a boat load of custom equipment and a pringles can-tenna might find out you have a gun from 300' away...?

cant the government use them to find our guns when the day comes when they are all banned and we are ordered to turn them in or face fines and/or imprisonment?
 
When the thread turns to gibbering paranoia instead of thoughtful, it's time to close it.

I'm not sure how this one survived so long.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top