Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CNN trashing .50 BMG's right NOW!

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by orangeninja, Aug 26, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. orangeninja

    orangeninja Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    CNN is running a .50 cal as the “PERFECT” terror weapon review right now. One of the things they show as it’s possible use is shooting down an airliner.

    Lets examine the hard facts:

    A Boeing 727, which is used in their demonstration; has a cruising speed of 570-605 MPH. It cruises at 30,000 to 40,000 feet. There are 5280 ft. in a mile. Thus to shoot down an airborne cruising airliner, or even “CRIPPLE” it as CNN says is possible, the would be terrorist has to:

    Fire a “hit” at a target approximately 5.68 to 7.58 miles away and the target is traveling at 570 to 605 MPH.

    They also pointed out that you could hit the plane at the airport either landing or taking off or as it taxied or sat…to which I say, “so what?” The cabin will not loose pressure as it would at 30,000 feet and all the pilot has to do is swing the plane around or bring it back down. The likelihood of a 727 being “shot down” even within a 1000 feet of being near the plane is probably hovering at around a 0%. As for the chances of a dumb ass hauling around a 4 to 6 foot long rifle that holds 1 to 5 rounds and avoiding detection by police, surveillance cameras and security, probably greater than 1%.

    To be quite honest it would be easier for a terrorist to build a bomb using fertilizer and diesel fuel…so I guess we should outlaw gas and cow ????? too.

    Just the facts Mama.

    Alduro…………out.
     
  2. afasano

    afasano Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    255
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    The first problem with that is, any bullet begins to slow down as soon as it goes out of the barrel. so how can it catch up with an airliner ; :barf: Let's not get too technical with these people.
     
  3. fgr39

    fgr39 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    350
    Location:
    MD
    I guess they had to counter Shooting Gallery. They just covered long range competitions using the fifty and showing that it is a sporting round.
     
  4. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    Yeah, they probably beleived what Micheal Bane said about soaking a .224" HPBT in a solution of sugar water and tequila for six months and harvesting the big ones. :scrutiny: :neener: :neener:
     
  5. miko

    miko Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Messages:
    495
    Imagine a spotter next to a sniper and another spotter on the side of the flight path equipped with theodolites.
    With such a setup it can be ensured that the sniper is shooting at the plane travelling head-on (no lead involved) at altitude no more than 500 yards and distance no more than one mile when the plane is at a peviously pre-determined spot at precisely known velocity. The velocity of the plane adds to the velocity of the bullet at the time of impact.

    The shooting can be done at night, with muzzle flash easily concealed from the pilots, from a vehicle.

    miko
     
  6. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    There is another thread here about the NYPD acquiring .50 BMGs. Is CNN suggesting that the NYPD is a terrorist organization?
     
  7. Taurus 66

    Taurus 66 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,485
    Location:
    Rochester, NY
    The media should turn their sights to shoulder fired AAWs, but even more important than the weapon is its user. Ban 50 BMG?? How about banning terrorists?! Get Alakhshmed, Muhammad Mullahhaha and Alyktu Rubitupandown out of the country alreay!! They're nothing but trouble.
     
  8. NeveraVictimAgain

    NeveraVictimAgain Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    344
    What is "Shooting Gallery"? If it's a TV show, when is it broadcast and on what network please?
     
  9. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    Shooting Gallery is on the Outdoor Channel- Dishnetwork channel 153. It was on tonight at 7:30, I think, and it'll be re-run a couple of times over the weekend and other times late at night.
     
  10. hillbilly

    hillbilly Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Messages:
    3,166
    Location:
    Iowa
    I'm SHOCKED!!!!

    You mean folks still actually watch CNN shows???????????

    That's incredible.

    hillbilly
     
  11. danny

    danny Member

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2003
    Messages:
    31
    Location:
    NW of Chicago
    I was in the Navy years ago before it went all missle. Our 3" and 5" guns could shoot down a plane at cruising altitudes but it took some fairly sophisticated radar to lock on and computers to calculate where the plane would be when the projectile got up there. Factored in target speed, wind, air density, and lots of other variables (27 in all). Even then, we sometimes would miss. The idea of a terrorist hitting one with a shoulder-fired rifle is ridiculous. He may as well throw rocks for all the good it would do.
     
  12. scott.cr

    scott.cr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2005
    Messages:
    101
    Location:
    Long Beach, Calif.
    The whole problem with this thread is that you're "examining the facts." Mainstream media will never examine the facts.

    One of the greatest lines of journalists is: "If it bleeds, it leads." It's the absolute truth as far as pro journalists go. They don't care about fact, just sensationalism.

    Right now I'm enrolled in a local university in their journalism program. Yes I am (actually, was) a professional journalist. I have to tell you, journalists are pompous and they love the fact that they can sway a nation.

    I had the hugest argument with my Jou 101 prof when he was all proud that what the media says can topple a U.S. President. My angle was that we were supposed to observe and report. His angle was how powerful the media is.
     
  13. mustanger98

    mustanger98 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,986
    Location:
    Union County, GA, CSA
    Some people just habitually ask the wrong question- "can we" instead of "should we."
     
  14. odysseus

    odysseus Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    946
    Location:
    US Citizen
    Watching it now... so far it's full of hype, paranoia, and hidden facts. It's definetely anti-gun.

    They call the .50 a "mini artillary shell" perfect for terrorists.

    Man...I need a shovel. :barf:
     
  15. Double Naught Spy

    Double Naught Spy Sus Venator

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    9,699
    Location:
    Forestburg, Texas
    The CNN segment has been on before.

    FYI alduro, posting to the forum isn't the same thing as instant messaging. I looked and CNN isn't showing this segment right now. Why? Because your right now when posted is now ancient history. Your time sensitive post is sort of like the telegram that arrived hours after the attack on Pearl Harbor that warned of the inbound attackers.
     
  16. RnR

    RnR Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Messages:
    140
    Location:
    MI, USA
    It's all in the timing...

    With Congress in recess, the <names witheld> probably think there is a greater chance to inject this kind of nonsensical reportage directly into the nervous systems of the elect few. The critters that work on the Hill likely don't get to watch much of the vast wasteland of TV "news" when in session.

    Might the anti's be trying to cut out the middle-person and go straight for the legislative juglar? Perhaps...
     
  17. MudPuppy

    MudPuppy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,529
    Location:
    UK and Texas
    While the whole 50BMG BS about being the "perfect terrorist gun" is just that, its also misleading on our part to say that the bad guys would be taking shots at the airliners while their at cruising altitudes. I mean seriously, if you were a bad guy, is that how you'd emply the weapon agains that target??

    I mean, stinger anti-aircraft missiles won't do the job under those circumstances, right?

    While I'm not going to go in the various ways that terrorists could be efficient (I'm sure most folks here are smart enough to figure out would work, the terrorists most certainly do--as proven with the last airliners knocked down with box-cutters, not to mention some cheap and easily mfg'ed bombs on buses in london, or trains in spain.), I find it ridiculous that the hype with the 50 is where it is.
     
  18. CARRY'IN

    CARRY'IN member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2005
    Messages:
    233
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay area
    I will go with Miko- it is possible to get hits on takeoff or landing if the plane is coming directly at you or away from you. And you could fire from inside a van, using it as a giant flash suppressor. Still hard to knock an airliner down though. Have to do alot of damage unless you are using an indendiary and are lucky enough to blow up a fuel tank. 50 is a great anti-helicopter weapon though. Helo's are easy to knock down. The 50 is an "anti-material" weapon and could be used for terrorist purposes but so can alot of things. I would say keep track of the weapons- perhaps enroll the shooters in a kind of swiss model "national militia." It's the only chance we have of holding on to them. Dont mean to sound anti 50 but the first time someone gets assassinated or a terrorist uses one here- they will be taken out of the hands of citizens. It's a sure thing.
     
  19. orangeninja

    orangeninja Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2003
    Messages:
    3,117
    Double Naught Spy

    "The CNN segment has been on before.

    FYI alduro, posting to the forum isn't the same thing as instant messaging. I looked and CNN isn't showing this segment right now. Why? Because your right now when posted is now ancient history. Your time sensitive post is sort of like the telegram that arrived hours after the attack on Pearl Harbor that warned of the inbound attackers."


    Yeah...thanks for explaining how a message board works. Really. Notice the time and date on the top of my post....yeah...all those funny numbers? Yeah, that's when the show was on in case you would like to reference the material or better yet, since CNN broadcasts in cycles, wait for them to show it again in 4 hours.

    So my appologies to Double Naught and all others who ran with all urgency to the television without checking the time and date of the post. :rolleyes:
     
  20. WarMachine

    WarMachine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    506
    Location:
    Earth
    I just cannot understand how people can live their lives believing this biased garbage. I encounter these kinda issues all the time since some people I know are relatively anti-gun, and say that guns should ONLY be used by military, police, or for defense. Since I use my guns for sport primarily they say I am just wasting my time and money and that I should put that money towards stuff I acutally need... :barf:

    I would like to see them to only spend their time doing stuff that is absolutely necessary to their survival with no time spent on luxuries or fun :cuss:

    Woah, I'm getting a little off-topic here. Rant mode OFF...
     
  21. Tylden

    Tylden Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2005
    Messages:
    153
    Location:
    Frankfort, Kentucky
    All I can say is I would have a real hard time hitting a deer moving at 10 mph at a range of 600 yards.....there would be absolutely no way in h*ll to hit a plane moving at 600 mph at a range of 30,000 feet. I think my chances of winning the lottery twice in one week would be a safer bet. :banghead:
     
  22. WarMachine

    WarMachine Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    506
    Location:
    Earth
    Yea, winning the lottery twice in one week, while being mauled by Big-Foot, during a solar eclipse, on the date of 06/06/06 at 3:08PM :rolleyes:
     
  23. MudPuppy

    MudPuppy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,529
    Location:
    UK and Texas
    Tylden, is that the shot you would take with the rifle if you were a terrorist? Or would you line up in the flight path on take off or landing--aircraft straight at you at a speed of less that 250?

    Someone here could do the math--a 700 meter shot, compensating for drop, increasing/decreasing speed and altitude of the aircraft. I still think its crap, but if our response to the 50 cal "threat" is "oh, a plane flies 5 miles up at 650 mph" the antigunners will make us look like fools or liars.
     
  24. benEzra

    benEzra Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    8,584
    Location:
    Down East in NC
    Actually, it's a LOT harder than you think, even if the plane is on the GROUND and coming straight at the shooter, as on takeoff.

    I ran this little scenario in a discussion with an anti about the supposed grave danger .50's pose to airplanes. He granted that a half-inch bullet isn't going to do diddly squat to an airliner, but argued that taking out both pilots or hitting both engine cores on takeoff would cause a crash. I ran the numbers, as follows:

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page