copies of reports and documents
First to answer the question about Rick Brent's reason to enter the residence. He wanted to check the condition of the property.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
These documents were converted from image files to text files using OCR software. When I posted them here their format was changed and any handwritten notations did not transfer.
Lt Rob McDaniel's memo to Chief Wagoner concerning the accuracy of information in their reports. The concern was the names and identity information listed on the reports.
•
Memorandum
To: Chief Tom Wagoner
From: Lieutenant Rob McDaniel
Date: November 5, 2004
Re: Richard Petersen, concern review 04-40
I have addressed Mr. Petersen via the email that was sent today, in which I told him that I do not have any other action to take that could assist him regarding the April 15, 2004 incident. I also reviewed the Info Center listing on Mr. Petersen to look at the two names listed to see if they were the same person. Mr. Petersen had previously stated that he felt that we had given him the offense report of a case that was for a victim named Richard Earl Peterson. The former person, I believe, is Richard Neil Petersen. In Info Center there were two different dates of birth as well.
I met with Dee Ann Beaman from Records to confirm what we have for accurate records. She and I felt that both of these data entries were probably on the same person. That is why that the records had been merged into the same data listing. I checked CCIC for driver's license information. I discovered that both names had dates of birth listed the same, 11/08/53.
Richard Petersen was given copies of offense reports 04-3071 and 04-3415 on October 12,2004 through the regular records release process. Each case had been listed to different names, but both with the same date of birth.
I think that we acted properly in the records release and in meeting Mr. Petersen's requests. I would like you to note this and return this to the original complaint file. Thank you.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Vermilye's memo to "Police Department" and his effort to have me arrested for "going public" with information about the missing guns and the false reports related to the theft.
•
Kim Pals
From: Tom Vermilye
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:16 PM
To: Police Department
Cc: Karen Stevens
Subject: Richard Petersen "Notices"
Recently several people have contacted me regarding the "Notice" that Richard Petersen has been distributing throughout our fair city. The Notice makes references to the Chief retiring and Rick Brent and I being involved in alleged illegal activity.
Joe Berdin is in the process of compiling information about the situation and once complete, he plans to present a Criminal Libel case to the DA's office.
I have included information from Gary Patzer in my written statement; however, I know there are more of you who have heard of or actually received these notices. Would you please forward your information to Joe Berdin as to where you found the notices or what area of the city they were being distributed. Word has it that Petersen made 1000 copies.
Thanks and if you have any questions, you know where to find me.
Tom Vermilye
Ext. 2253
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Police Incident Report handled by LPD Captain Hecker. His response was to tell me he would not talk with me about their reports or allow me to file additional reports.
01 Police Agency Incident Report
Date_Time Performed By Comment Type Comment
05/12/2005 0848:53 JG Response HANDLED BY CAPT HECKER
Response Alarms ...
Date Time Alarm Number Performed By
User Time Stamps ...
*TimeStamp Description Time Performed By
Audit...
Date_Time Reason Request Comment Disposition Requested By Performed By
User Data ...
Field Description Field Data
Disposi tions ...
Disposition Time Set PerformedBy
Handled by Officer 05/12/2005 084925 Gordon, Jodi
V31
Date: 1/26/2007 Time: 10:24:03 Operator: J MG Program: Edittvlzr.exe Incident Number: 2005-00023170
Page 1 of 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from LPD Officer Frank Ryan to "Police Department" about serving me with Trespass Notices.
•
Kim Pals
From: Frank Ryan
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 20052:27 PM
To: Police Department
Cc: Don Williams; John Duval
SUbject: Richard Petersen Trespass Notices--Case 05-4648
Today Richard Petersen, 110853, was served three trespass notices under this case number. The locations covered are:
1. Reporter Herald, 201 E. 5th St.
2. Law Offices of Jack Weatherill, 1351 N. Lincoln
3. City of Loveland buildings (both bulldinqs), 500 E. 3rd
In conjunction with the City of Loveland trespass notice, a letter from Don Williams was given to Petersen in which he was notified he was not allowed at 500 E 3rd without prior written approval from the City Attorney. Petersen was also advised that, if he violated this notification, he would be charged with Unlawful Conduct On Public Property, CRS 18-9-117.
At this time the Police & Courts Building is not included as "off limits". Copies of all notices and Den's letter are in Dispatch.
Mr. Petersen refused to sign any of the Notices but was, in fact, served and the consequences of violation were explained to him. Needless to say, he disagrees with the actions taken by the PD and City.
If Mr. Petersen violates any of these notices, please take enforcement action.
01/26/2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo from LPD Officer Ray Miller to Luke Hecker and others suggesting that the City Attorney consider adding the Police Department to his list of no trespass locations.
•
Kim Pals
From: Ray Miller
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2005 7:40 AM
To: Luke Hecker; Bob Klinger; Tim Brown; Leslie Young; John Manago; Rob McDaniel
Subject: RE: Petersen
Luke,
I would maybe just ask John if he could add the Police Dept. address to his letter also.
Ray Miller
Information Services Division Loveland Police Department 81 O~. 10th St.
Loveland, CO 80537 (970)962-2213
[email protected]
From: Luke Hecker
sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 13:52
To: Ray Miller; Bob Klinger; Tim Brown; Leslie Young; John Manago; Rob McDaniel Subject: FW: Petersen
FYI.
From: John Duval
sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 10:58 To: '
[email protected]'
Cc: Don Williams; Karen Stevens; Luke Hecker Subject: FW: Petersen
Cliff,
This morning I left you a voicemail about the problems we are having with a citizen named Richard Petersen coming to the City's offices. Attached is the letter I explained in my voicemail that I would like to provide to Mr. Petersen giving him notice that he cannot enter the City's two buildings at 500 East Third Street without making prior arrangements through the City Attorney's Office. I would like to send him this letter on the assumption that it would form the basis to charge and arrest Mr. Petersen for "unlawful conduct on public property" under CRS Section 18-9-117 if he enters one of the City's buildings without getting the prior permission required in the letter. But, before I sent Mr. Petersen this letter, I wanted to run this by you to see if you think this would even be a prosecutable offense through you office? Thanks for your help on this.
John Duval
962-2541
01/26/2007
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LPD Report detailing the handling of my attempt to file complaints about the numerous false statements made by Vermilye and Brent.
01 Police Agency Incident Report
Comments ...
Date_Time Performed By Comment Type Comment
07/12/2005 14:46:37 Automatic by System Response (Premise] pd - guard station number is 679-4480
07/12/2005 14:47: 19 MS Response COMPL IS IN THE LOBBY WITH NUMEROUS REPORTS IN HAND CLAIMING INCONSISTENCIES
07/12/2005 14:50:07 KL Response a41 has some paper work to serve on him
07/12/2005 14:50 11 KL Response v16 paged
07/12/2005 14:52:35 KL Response will serve it when the capt has been contacted
07/12/2005 14:52:35 KL Response per v16 send a sgt out
07/12/2005 14:54:18 KL Response need to tell him we are not talking with him about our reports and if he wants to sue us go a head. and if he doesn't leave we will
arrest him for trespassing
Response Alarms, ..
Date Time Alarm Number Performed By
User Time Stamps …
TimeStamp Description Time Performed By
rrne amp escription une
Audit...
Date_Time Reason Request Comment Disposition Requested By Performed By
User Data ...
Field Description Field Data
Dispositions .. ,
Disposition Time Set PerformedBy
Handled by Officer 07/12/2005 15:26:06 Lindschrnidt, Kalie
A41
S1O
Date: 1/26/2007 Time: 10:24:47 Operator: JMG Program: EditMgr.exe Incident Number: 2005-00036386 Page: 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
LPD Officer Steve Friedle's report about Brent's confirmation that his written statement to Friedle was false. In that statement, which Brent claimed was prepared with the assistance of his attorney, explained how his sister and brother-in-law gained possession of property I had reported as stolen.
Activity Number: Loveland Police Department
OR 2004-008880/2
On Tuesday, 072605, an e-mail was sent to me by RICHARD PETERSEN stating that information in my report I had completed at an earlier time was not correct. PETERSEN stated he has never lived at 222 Acacia Drive as recorded in my supplemental report dated 011705. PETERSEN also stated that the location that I mention in my report of Nickel and Boise is incorrect and the actual location of where the storage unit was 11 th Street and Boise.
PETERSEN also stated the list of items in my original report is incomplete and does not list all of the stolen property or its total value. In my original report dated 110804, PETERSEN gave me a list of items that he believed were missing. PETERSEN told me there were still several boxes left in the storage shed that he had not gone through.
I told PETERSEN I would be listing the items he had placed an asterisk by as being confirmed as stolen. He told me that would be fine and he would get back with me regarding the other items. Therefore, the items that are listed in my original report would not match that of the list that PETERSEN gave to me. As such, there is no need in including those items in the report since his list is attached with the case file as being an all inclusive list. Furthermore, this case was reviewed with the Larimer County District Attorney's Office Deputy District Attorney Renee Doak and she declined to file this case as a criminal case. She said it was civil in nature.
In regards to the supplemental report that stated PETERSEN lived at 222 Acacia Drive, this information came from a written statement that was given to me by RICK BRENT. In RICK BRENT'S statement on the second line it stated "MR PETERSEN lived in our rental property located at 222 Acacia Drive, Loveland, Colorado."
On Monday, 072505, I left a voice mail message on BRENT'S cell phone and home phone asking him to call me regarding the e-mail that PETERSEN had sent to me. When I returned to work on Saturday, 073005, I had a voice mail from BRENT, who stated PETERSEN did not ever live at 222 Acacia Drive. This is in conflict with the written statement that BRENT had given to me on 122304. Furthermore, any discrepancies that PETERSEN or BRENT may have with my reports would be solely based on the information that they gave to me, which I used as a basis to complete my reports.
On Saturday, 073005, I sent an e-mail to PETERSEN explaining to him that I did an additional supplemental report to address the issues he had with my report.
END OF NARRATIVE/jj
5/16/20072:47 PM