I always find these discussions interesting. A few months ago there was the shooting in the washington mall and a few people questioned if the right thing to do if you were there and armed would be to defend someone in need or only worry about your own tail. The responses were along the lines of save your own butt, they had the chance to carry, legal liability, etc. Most people didn't seem like they would help someone in need in the situation. Many tore into the guy that did try to stop the kid and got shot in the process. Yet in this thread everyone commends this person and says we need more people like him, hopefully others would do the same, he should have been carrying. Whats the difference, am I missing something? I think both their actions are valiant.