Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Colt 1892 left wheeler question

Discussion in 'Firearms Research' started by .45Guy, Mar 3, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. .45Guy

    .45Guy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,305
    I'm looking at an 1892 for parts. However this one has a cylinder with Rinaldo's initials stamped, yet the butt is without markings. Every other service left wheeler I've seen was property marked on the butt. Were some unmarked?
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2011
  2. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    Colt sometime used left-over military parts in commercial revolvers. See what the date of manufacture was on your revolver, in particular if it was made after 1903.

    www.proofhouse.com
     
  3. Jim K

    Jim K Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    17,615
    OK, I am rewriting this one. I assume the unmarked butt is what you have as a potential parts gun. That gun has had the butt markings removed at some point, and I think it could be trouble. That was commonly done when someone "borrowed" a gun from the Army and wanted to remove the military markings. If the gun was military, RAC should be on the left frame "knuckle" and under the barrel as well as on the cylinder. If it is a civilian gun, the knuckle should have the rampant colt trademark, but the Colt serial number should be on the butt.

    Jim
     
    Last edited: Mar 5, 2011
  4. Old Fuff

    Old Fuff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    23,908
    Location:
    Arizona
    I thought I could see the faint remains of a civilian serial nunber at the front of the butt. Maybe not. If there isn't one, Jim is right.
     
  5. .45Guy

    .45Guy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Messages:
    2,305
    Thanks guys. I decided to pass on it, as the price went higher than the individual parts would be.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page