Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Colt or USFA SAA revolver?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Kestrel, Nov 8, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    Is the Colt made better than the USFA SAA revolvers?

    Thanks,
    Steve
     
  2. Gunsnrovers

    Gunsnrovers Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,477
    Location:
    Lost Angeles
    USFA

    I believe that USFA makes a better revolver, but that the Colt will hold more value $ wise. If you're looking for a shooter made in the Blue Dome, I would get the USFA. If you want a safe queen to collect, get a Colt.

    Just my $0.02.

    Jeff
     
  3. Jim March

    Jim March Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,732
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
  4. Josey

    Josey member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2003
    Messages:
    1,476
    Location:
    Catfish Co, KY
    I would buy a Colt SAA. I have seen and shot a few USPFA and USFA pistols. They aren't that great. The fit and finish was terrific on their Omni Potent revolvers. The China Camps were nice but, rusted quickly. That was their design decision. They were high dollar Ubertis just like Cimmarons for a time. USFA now makes their own revolvers and outsources parts from USA suppliers. They are not really a great deal for your money. The cheaper Rodeo line is OK but, overpriced. Collectors do buy new USFA models and keep them in their safes. I have handled many Colts. The new Colt is turning out the BEST SAA ever! The last one I looked over was flawless and the grips seemed to be a perfect fit to the frame. They have even begun to use the old style press in cylinder bushing again. BP shooters will like that. The Colt has mystery, mystique, desirability and appreciates in resale. Why would anyone consider anything else? I do shoot Rugers in 44-40 myself. Why? I shoot hot BP loads. I know that Rugers are strong, cheap to repair or replace and have the "look". I could buy four used Rugers to one Colt SAA.
     
  5. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    see my remarks on that other thread:)

    The USFA Rodeo is good, if you like that class of gun. They have a little larger diameter cylinder than the SAA, so are a bit stronger.

    In a high end SAA, though, the polished/blue/color case USFA costs as much as a Colt, and the resale value is an unknown.

    The Colt New frontiers may be the best of both worlds, IMHO.
     
  6. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    tex,

    I thought the Rodeo was the same as the polished blue USFA, just with the lower finishing. Are you sure?

    Steve
     
  7. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    The Rodeos I have seen are matte (sandblasted) blue all over, except for the hammer, which is color cased. The high end USFA's have color cased frames, with bright polished blue barrel & cylinder, and now cost well over $1000 each. When they first came out, they were in the $800 range, which was a good deal.

    There are other variations, like the China Camp model which is in the white. There also have a couple of other minor variations, like target models and Bisley models
     
  8. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    tex,

    What I meant, was in reference to what you wrote about the larger cylinder diameter on the Rodeo. I thought there was no difference between them, other than the finish?

    Steve
     
  9. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    Ah okay...

    What I have read (forget which magazine) is the .45 Colt USFA cylinders are .015" bigger than Colts, to give a little more strength. The article didn't say if that was true of all their guns, or just the Rodeo. I don't own a SAA clone or Colt, so I can't confirm it either way. It's easy to confirm if you have a pair of calipers.
     
  10. stevelyn

    stevelyn Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,290
    Location:
    Fairbanksan in Aleutian Hell
    Ahem.......Have you thought about checking out the new Beretta Stampede? It can be had for less than the Colt or the USFA.
     
  11. mec

    mec Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,458
    Cylinder diameter is this much bigger than a colt. It is the same as a Uberti we had on hand
    [​IMG]
    Fit and finish is very nice
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    It takes 12 weeks to get one of these- they make them up as orders are received. The Rodeos don't take as long because they are kept in stock. The USFA company appears to care about marketing a quality product
     
  12. Kestrel

    Kestrel Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,168
    mec,

    Those guns are beautiful.

    Steve
     
  13. tex_n_cal

    tex_n_cal Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    1,160
    Location:
    CA
    mec - thanks for confirming the size - .025" is more better than .015", anyway:)

    I of course still want a .44 Special Colt. I was surprised to learn on the USFA website they don't offer the Special, just the Russian.
     
  14. mec

    mec Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,458
    Really?! I thought about a .44 Special myself but went ahead and got the .45. The article with these pictures is on www.gunblast.com with links to a piece by Jeff Quinn on the Rodeo.
    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page