Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Colts XSE or S&W 1911 SC

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by stogiegila, Feb 25, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. stogiegila

    stogiegila Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    I'm struggling with a decision whether to get the Colt XSE in commander size or the S&W 1911 PD (scandium) or Stainless also in commander size.

    I'm convinced that I want the commander 4.25" size, but both the Colt and S&W seem to be very comparable. The S&W is approx. 8 ounces lighter due to the scandium frame, but if I go stainless, any weight savings is lost. But availability is harder :cuss:

    Opinions?

    PS..anyone interseted in a G19 3rd Gen ;)
     
  2. Texas Colt

    Texas Colt Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    Messages:
    629
    Location:
    Central Texas
    I would personally go with the Colt. I have a stainless XSE and I love it!

    If you want the lighter weight frame, get the Colt Lightweight XSE.
     
  3. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    I recently bought a Colt Commander XSE stainless with a stainless frame. I am not impressed with the overall workmanship of my particular pistol.

    My early model Kimber Classic Custom is superior in all regards as compared to the Colt. I suspect the S&W will be as well, although I do not own a S&W 1911.
     
  4. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    I've got an older XSE that has been absolutely a joy to own & shoot! Recommend them highly! :D
     
  5. Ala Dan

    Ala Dan Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,879
    Location:
    Home Of The First Capitol Of The Confederate State
    I don't own the S&W scandium frame commander length 1911; but I do own
    the all stainless 5" S&W 1911, product code #108282. It has run flawlessly
    from day one and has the Novak sights, beavertail grip safety, skeletonized
    trigger, and combat hammer. Just knowing that this particular gun runs right
    along side my more expensive Les Baer TRS, and without any problems; I'd
    have too vote for the S&W~! :scrutiny: ;) :D
     
  6. longeyes

    longeyes member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    7,227
    Location:
    True West...Hotel California
    You'll find the weight difference significant (Scandium S&W vs steel Colt). I don't own a Colt Commander but I do own the S&W PD and so far it's proven to be a very good pistol in all respects.
     
    Last edited: Feb 27, 2007
  7. Gordon

    Gordon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,293
    Location:
    central Kali.
    That IS a hard decision! I'll tell you I have several nice Combat Commanders (series 70's) and CCW my S&W1911PD instead, half a pound being alot. They both are reliable, my Gunsite Edition is dehorned with super Novak Gold bead sights.The S&W is everybit as accurate as a standard Colt Commander, it would take a Barsto Barrel to beat the S&W. The trigger on the S&Ws I've seen is much better than newer 80 series Colt, MUCH better.:)
     
  8. bofe954

    bofe954 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2004
    Messages:
    502
    I can't find a weight on Colt's site but the aluminum framed XSE (O4860XSE) should weigh about the same as a scandium S+W. It may be a little different but not 8 oz.

    The grip safety is a different shape on the Colt, I am not sure if you would really feel the difference, but you might.
     
  9. fastbolt

    fastbolt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,641
    Location:
    Within the lightning
    I had occasion to buy a Colt Stainless Government XSE and then a SW1911Sc 5".

    Both are fine examples of the 1911-type design. The XSE was my 4th Colt Model O Pistol.

    If I buy another 1911-type pistol ... it'll be another SW1911.;)

    I've been thinking about one of the Gunsite SW1911PD's, too. It would replace the original Colt Lightweight Commander I so foolishly traded off in the early 70's.

    Oh yeah, about having bought both a Colt XSE and a SW1911 ...

    When I reach into the safe to pick a 1911 to shoot for an extended range session, it's the SW1911Sc. ;)
     
  10. dairycreek

    dairycreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,459
    Location:
    North Plains, Oregon
    Can't tell you which you should choose but can tell you my personal experience with the S&W 1911Sc. I have owned and carried mine for about two years and, as you can see from the pic, it is an early model with the
    "billboard" on the side [​IMG]
    It is a Commander model and unoaded weight just 26 ounces which allows me to carry it in a IWB FIST #1 Clip holster [​IMG]
    Because of its weight it has been a marvelous concealed carry piece. It has been 100% reliable across its life so far and accuracy is more than just reasonable. I certainly recommend it without reservation.
     
  11. stogiegila

    stogiegila Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Great Info

    Thanks,

    I love the pics!
     
  12. GunNut

    GunNut Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,075
    Location:
    Washington State
    Go with the Colt Lightweight Commander XSE.
     
  13. rellascout

    rellascout member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    5,149
    Location:
    VA
    Colt better resale value and no schwartz safety.
     
  14. romma

    romma Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    3,208
    Location:
    Southeastern,CT
    Go with the Smith scandium! You know you want it! :)
     
  15. larry starling

    larry starling Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    723
    Location:
    north carolina
    Go with the Colt. My XSE's have been great...I can't say the same for my S&W or any kimber I have owned......:cool:
     
  16. mike56

    mike56 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2004
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    Central Connecticut
    Just finished the exact same "shopping" myself.
    I had and sold an early SW 1911. Had some problems, they very quickly took care of. But accuracy was never very good compared to my 5 inch guns.

    Found that the new Smith 1911and the colt lightweight commander had a $20 price difference.

    Had advice from some smith's that at the end of the day, the colt would be worth more. I did buy the colt and it has functioned great.

    One point I overlooked, was customizing the frame. The colt frame is anodized aluminum, with a teflon coating for hardness. Any modifications (checkering) will requie more cost to re-finish.
    That's were the Smith scandium pays off.
     
  17. lev83

    lev83 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2006
    Messages:
    233
    Not sure I understand the question...arent all 1911's made by Colt. Just kidding but I too think you should opt for the Colt
     
  18. treebeard

    treebeard Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2006
    Messages:
    775
    Location:
    LFOD in NH
    I had one of the more recent 1911SC's and while it was light and felt good in my hand I did not like the recoil while shooting 230gr. bullets, therefore I traded it.
     
  19. Biggums

    Biggums Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    128
    Colts

    I'd run with the Colt. I think they are the ""real deal" that will protect you and hold value all at the same time.
     
  20. Slvr Surfr

    Slvr Surfr Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2006
    Messages:
    298
    Location:
    DFW, Texas, USA
    Ive got the Scandium commander for CCW. Its the way to go. I think bang for buck they are the best! I think the Scandium will also go a long way toward longevity as well.

    [​IMG]
     
  21. Biggums

    Biggums Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2006
    Messages:
    128
    Colt

    The way I go!
     

    Attached Files:

  22. stogiegila

    stogiegila Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2005
    Messages:
    230
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    Decision has been made - Meet my new friend

    Well, after a long debate and ongoing comparisons at my local store I decided on a S&W 1911SC 4.25" in stainless.


    http://picasaweb.google.com/GiordanoJJ/SW1911/photo#5037862660263312658

    Here it is with his roommate. I'm not sure on how to post pictures, but hopefully one of the links will work.

    Thanks for all the help. I can't wait to take it to the range and test it out. Now I have to decide on a holster. I'm thinking Milt Sparks either the Versa Max II or Summer II
     
  23. jlh26oo

    jlh26oo Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2005
    Messages:
    1,053
    Nice. Congrats.

    I'm personally waiting until S&W starts nitrocarbing their commander size 1911's, so the steel (not just finish) will be as tough as that of your "roomate" there. They are already treating their sw1911pd 5" version, only company I know of that is doing so on a factory 1911 (chemical equivalent of tennifer that is). Don't know why they are limiting it to just that model.
     
  24. dbshabo

    dbshabo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2003
    Messages:
    202
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    I could have authored this post. I'm considering the same two pistols. I have never owned a Colt (part of the reason I'm looking at the XSE) but I do own an early model 5" S&W 1911 (with the billboard rollmark as noted in a post above this one). I have not had one problem with that gun. I've got about 2K rounds thru her now, flawless. I have changed out the recoil spring a couple times but that's normal.

    Both guns have things I don't want. The Colt has an ambi safety, don't think that would be good for IWB carry, it might become disengaged accidentally from being pushed against something I'm leaning against. I'm sure everyone who carries one will tell me that will never happen. I learned a long time ago to never say never in this crazy world. I don't like the extended baseplate on the S&W mags. I'm sure they can be replaced with flush fit plates. If not I could purchase replacement mags. I like the external extractor myself, unlike most 1911 fans.

    I may just buy an M&P 45 compact. I have a M&P 9c that I carry now. Sweet little gun I tell ya. Carries well, shoots straight, ammo is cheaper than .40 or .45, and shoots clean, very easy to clean.

    I do like the fact that both companies are American. I think both are excellent companies that deserve our business. One of them is gonna get more of mine. Enjoy your new friend.

    Shabo
     
  25. fastbolt

    fastbolt Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,641
    Location:
    Within the lightning
    Hey, an older thread revived ...

    Somebody had an interest in the topic and some time on their hands, it seems.

    Since my earlier posting in this thread I've picked up a M&P 45 full-size model (with thumb safeties, as a nod toward my long time use of 1911's, and night sights).

    It has become the first .45 pistol I reach for when getting ready to leave for a long session at the range. I finally had to start making myself leave it at home and take one of my 1911's to the range, instead. While I enjoyed running a few hundred rounds of duty-type loads through my XSE for a few range sessions, at the same time I missed the M&P 45.

    My M&P 45 has easily rivaled the inherent and practical accuracy of my XSE and SW1911SC 5" guns, even out to 50+ yards. Naturally, having night sights on the M&P makes it a bit more practical for low/reduced light sessions. For some reason I've just never gotten around to putting night sights on my 1911's, although several of my other 'working' guns have them. I suppose that indicates to some extent where my priorities have been shifting over the years.

    Although I also picked up a M&P 40c, I rather like the M&P pistol platform chambered in .45 ACP.

    I've handled and fired a fair number of plastic framed .45's over the years, and the M&P was the first one which has suited me this well. Of the nine .45 pistols I presently own, it's my only plastic .45.

    I'm fairly sure that I'll add either Mid-size or Compact M&P 45 to my retirement collection sometime. The shorter slide/barrel configuration interests me for actual carry use. The slightly smaller grip frame of the compact model interests me the most in this regard, at the moment, but I may well end up with both. ;)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page