Closest to Ron Paul, followed closley by Obama. That's a little inaccurate though as my views do not reflect black and white answers to some of those questions.
Actually, there is only one thing that I potentially don't see eye to eye with Ron Paul on and that's the 2nd amendment. He has not yet made it clear whether or not he believes the states have the right to deny the 2nd amendment rights to it's citizens. The constitution and it's authors made it very clear that this is an unconditional national right. Again, I don't actually know where he stands on this. My views perfectly match his in every other way that I know of.
Now, why he has my vote, apart from the above:
1. "Voting for a winner" has really screwed this country up bad, and especially now that there is only one candidate that is at all any good, now is a better time then any to break away from this proven destructive philosophy. It's better to tell the crooks that they're loosing by voting for someone with little chance then for a crook, and right now, they are all (Democrat and republican) equally bad so without Ron Paul, I wouldn't even trouble myself with voting this year.
2. He's the only candidate who is not PROMISING to break his oath of office before even making it. When you are sworn in as president, you swear an oath to uphold and protect the constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic. When we have people promising to attack Iran, infringe on our gun rights, spy on us and do anything with taxes but get rid of them, then how can you trust them at all?
Paul has a perfect constitutional record. Even the one thing he's being hounded on, was actually him following the law. If you can't trust him, then you can't trust anyone, regardless what your views are.
3. I have been in the business of promoting Ron Paul and get a good look at his support. Regardless what the polls say, I think you'll be in for a surprise when the actual voting starts. Even the big boys are calling this a Dark Horse election and for a reason.