Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

comparison needed on charter arms bulldog and ruger sp101

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by Revolver Ocelot, Apr 11, 2011.

?

which one

Poll closed Apr 18, 2011.
  1. ruger sp101 .357 mag

    42 vote(s)
    91.3%
  2. charter bulldog .44 special

    4 vote(s)
    8.7%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Revolver Ocelot

    Revolver Ocelot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,470
    I'm getting ready to buy either a ruger sp101 or a charter arms bulldog in 44 special, I'm looking for opinions on the two revolvers as well as a picture showing a size comparison if anyone happens to have one.

    So tell me what you think of these two revolvers and how they compare.
     
  2. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    I have both and like both , but for different reasons..

    My Charter bulldog was made in 1980 in Stratford, Conn. and is a lightweight , 20 ounce gun with a 2.5 inch barrel. The recoil with my 240gr bullets is rather stiff. I carried it for many years IWB and recieved great comfort looking at the big lead bullets , especially in the Cold months of the year. In the summer I would carry the Colt Agent in the pocket. When Colt came out with the magnum carry , I went to it and retired my Bulldog , but still carry the Agent in the warmer months. I sometimes carry the Ruger SP101 in 357 mag., when I am hunting as a backup gun , but rarely as my daily carry gun. It weighs 26 oz and the Magnum carry weighs about 21 oz. If you can manage the weight ,the Ruger is a fine gun too.
     
  3. 32 Magnum

    32 Magnum Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2007
    Messages:
    445
    Location:
    Lehigh Valley - Eastern PA
    I don't have a comparison with the Ruger, but attached is a comparison pic. showing a "TARGET" Bulldog - same size frame as the Bulldog 44 - next to a S&W Mod 19 K frame. The SP101 is a bit smaller than the 19.
    IMG_2844.jpg
     
  4. snooperman

    snooperman Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    2,143
    I forgot to mention...

    that I have fired thousands of rounds through the lightweight Bulldog over many years without any problems with the gun and it still shoots great and the action is tight too. The hand on my SP101 went bad and had to go back to Ruger for some work. However, I do believe it to be a well made gun and should serve you well. For a carry gun, of the two, I would go with the bulldog, because of the weight.
     
  5. madcratebuilder

    madcratebuilder Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2007
    Messages:
    5,020
    Location:
    Northern Orygun
    I don't have a SP101 for comparison, but here's a Bulldog next to a S&W M640 J frame. I don't think you can find this caliber in a smaller package.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
  6. ldhulk

    ldhulk Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2011
    Messages:
    98
    I would put my money on the Ruger. The sp101 is built like a tank, and the company is one of the leaders in the industry. Charter Arms changed ownership more than once, and quality has varied through the years. Like with Taurus, you might get a jewel or you might get one that disassembles itself the first time you take it to the range.
     
  7. memphisjim

    memphisjim Member

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2008
    Messages:
    1,265
    ruger sp101
    but the son of sam killer used a charter 44
     
  8. newbuckeye

    newbuckeye Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2011
    Messages:
    462
    Location:
    Ohio
    +1 for the ruger. My .357 sp101 next to my Sig 1911.....

    [​IMG]
     
  9. foghornl

    foghornl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    7,403
    I had a mid-70's vintage Charter "Bulldog" .44, and it served me well. Charter has been through SEVERAL owners, and quality varied quite a bit, particularly in the 80's & early 90's.

    Lately, Charter seems to be producing as good a revolver as anyone in the lower-price category.
     
  10. Vern Humphrey

    Vern Humphrey Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    18,375
    Location:
    Deep in the Ozarks
    Yes, Charter Arms quality has varied quite a bit. Ruger quality is steady and dependable. And their customer survice is superb. That alone would lead me to choose Ruger.
     
  11. Lucky Derby

    Lucky Derby Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    2,142
    Location:
    Colorado Rockies
    Either caliber will get the job done. The .44 does so with less drama.
    That said, having owned a couple of Charter Arms Bulldogs, and currently owning an SP101, I can say the Ruger is the superior weapon. The CA's I owned were nothing but trouble. I really wish someone would make the Bulldog concept in a consistantly decent quality platform.
     
  12. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    I've said before I really wish there was an enlarged SP in .44 Special. Ruger isn't listening, though. The Bulldogs I've seen have not been up to scratch. Wobbly triggers and a generally cheap construction. I think people hold on to the good ones.
     
  13. Revolver Ocelot

    Revolver Ocelot Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2006
    Messages:
    1,470
    I tried looking for some of the six series revolvers or the gp100's that were converted to 44 spl (no one does it anymore) but haven't had any luck. If I got one though the six would probablly be better in size I'd go for a fixed sight gp100 that was converted as something just feels wrong about a 5 shot six
     
  14. Deltaboy

    Deltaboy Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2008
    Messages:
    6,262
    Location:
    Texas
    I vote for the Ruger. And I carry a Charter everyday but my Charter is from 1972 and is one of the best Charters ever put out.
     
  15. Leathermarshmallow

    Leathermarshmallow Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2010
    Messages:
    107
    Location:
    West Virginia
    I own both. The ruger is a better revolver and if I could keep only one, it would be the ruger.
     

    Attached Files:

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page