Could use a hand with newspaper poll (it's quick)

[Auslander808]

First off, Hello..New guy here with a request for assistance.
This http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/nationworld/sns-ap-miami-shooting,0,5107701.story was the story that led to the newspaper throwing up an informal poll on whether or not to ban guns. Informal, yes. But it'll get printed for sure... if it goes the way the paper wants of course! The heck no was leading by about 20%. Then 1/2 an hour went by and they got an enormous influx of "Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned." So maybe somebody did the same as I'm doing and posted to the Brady website...or we are going against a bot. Could use a quick vote to help the numbers.
POLL- http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news...-0124-miami-shooting-poll,0,2714959,post.poll
Thx in advance
Someone will be able to use these numbers as "evidence" for their cause. Let's hope it's us!

 

[indoorsoccerfrea]

did it

 

[Auslander808]

Greatly appreciated. The Heck No's have come up quite a it in the last hour or so since a few have started making the request and just jumped back into the lead!

 

[HK G3]

I'm torn between "Heck no" and " Yes, but only for idiots."

 

[camacho]

Done!

 

[udonb]

Done. With pleasure.

 

[J.R.W.]

Done, Heck No back in the lead @ 52.8%

 

[ultradoc]

it is done. thanks.

 

[Odd Job]

One vote from across the pond added.

 

[Prophet]

Heck, no! added.

 

[moooose102]

did my part. and will continue to ANYTIME i can!

 

[UnclePete]

I checked Heck No.

 

[MP3Mogul]

Did my part...

 

[Shovelhead]

Current stats.

Heck, no. (4664 responses) 49.7%

I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (306 responses) 3.3%

Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (4341 responses) 46.2%

Yes, but only for idiots. (77 responses) 0.8%

I'm not sure. (4 responses) 0.0%

9392 total responses (Results not scientific

 

[orionengnr]

unable to access the page...
Got it...on the third try.

 

[zx12rider]

Done

Always willing to help.

 

[Old Fuff]

When I try to vote I get an error message. Maybe they are unhappy with the current results.

 

[indoorsoccerfrea]

we're losing...

 

[Lightninstrike]

Done.

 

[Auslander808]

When I try to vote I get an error message. Maybe they are unhappy with the current results

Same poll, different link- http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/breakingnews/sfl-0124-miami-shooting-poll,0,1890571,post.poll

On several sites it's been noticed that the Yes Ban's are most likely using a bot to vote for them. It sits stagnant for hours and then jumps exactly 1000 in 2 seconds.

 

[JImbothefiveth]

Voted no. People like the killer will not obey the law, so people should be allowed to defend themselves.

 

[armedandsafe]

Just now results

Heck, no. (14569 responses)

59.9%

I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (770 responses)

3.2%

Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (8838 responses)

36.4%

Yes, but only for idiots. (120 responses)

0.5%

I'm not sure. (10 responses)

0.0%

24307 total responses (Results not scientific)

Keep at it, people!

Pops

 

[Auslander808]

I'm watching their bots at work right now. The Yes Ban's are jumping up at 10 per second right now. After a few hundred while I was watching it has stopped again. It'll stay that way until the program hits it again later

 

[HighNoon777]

lol I did a search before posting and you beat me to it. I can't do the bot thing, but I can definitely get in a good 10 votes per day.

As in, 10 votes from other people of course.

 

[bromdenlong]

It currently stands at



Heck, no. (28005 responses)

45.6%

I'm a gun supporter, but this recent case has me rethinking the access given. (774 responses)

1.3%

Yes, this is a wake-up call that guns need to be banned. (32479 responses)

52.9%

Yes, but only for idiots. (178 responses)

0.3%

I'm not sure. (14 responses)

0.0%

61450 total responses (Results not scientific)