Jim March
Member
Folks,
I have no use for McKinney either. She's a nut.
However.
Georgia is one of two states that have standardized on the Diebold "TS" voting machines. The "TS" is the older touchscreen that Diebold never created an individual-voter paper trail option for. So the votes are recorded electronically and that's it. Maryland is the other. There's a few TSes scattered around but they're mainly in those states.
The TS is the second worst voting machine in America, period, end of discussion. The worst? The Diebold GEMS central tabulator that counts the votes at county HQ from the TS or other Diebold machines in the field.
The third worst is the Diebold absentee ballot scanner.
I've just finished a massive project documenting the worst ills of these things. One set of problems related to Windows CE is such an incredible situation, it's possible to describe the Diebold touchscreen product line (TS and newer "TSx") as literally not legally meeting the definition of "voting machine" in 37 states, GA and MD included.
Here's the broadcast I just did on the subject minutes after finishing:
------------
There are now five files in the "Diebold fraud series" comprising the latest and most complete accounting of Diebold's sins to date:
http://www.equalccw.com/wincefraudwalkthrough.pdf – an overview of Diebold's Windows CE-related fraud. NEW TODAY: Appendix A constitutes a new page with additional evidence that this was deliberate on Diebold's part. Before we found that (again, appendix A) an argument could be made that Diebold might have declared the customized Windows CE code and Wyle ignored it. This is a specific statement that Diebold withheld the CE customizations from the test labs. Along with the Lee declaration, this in my opinion is the front-runner to putting Diebold flat out of the elections industry. Five pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/19202v2006.pdf - it's an ultra-condensed version of the file above, submitted to the California Secretary of State's site as an official request under California Election Code 19202. One page. Needs the Lee declaration in support.
http://www.equalccw.com/rrlee-wincedeclaration.pdf – the declaration of Dr. Richard Lee. Same as previously distributed, no changes. Three pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/thenasedblues.pdf – covers the possibility of NASED involvement in covering up the madness documented here and in items 1 and 2 of this list. ALL new. It's not "airtight" but like the rest it's "probable cause" for somebody with subpoena powers to sort out the truth: a gutsy district attorney could do it, a state AG would be better, or a very gutsy Federal prosecutor. The California SecState's office might be able to do it too, so go Bowen! Four pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/dieboldsinsandsecrecy.pdf - a more general listing (with links to evidence) of Diebold misconduct and cover-ups. 12 pages, but some big graphics. Over 9meg file size.
Folks, I'm pissed. More than that, I'm personally offended that Diebold is still in the vote biz. It's time for that to end.
And beyond that, it's time to point fingers at the oversight process that allowed them to run rampant. Because that certification and oversight process at the Federal level is the lynchpin behind ALL these vendors.
Everything here can be forwarded at will. The "WinCEfraudwalkthough" and "Lee declarations" must be a "matched set" of course...best if all five are mentioned as a set.
------------
As you can see, the page counts aren't all that bad.
I can't make you read it all, or even bits. If you're going to skip anything, skip the "19202" document and the "NASED" doc. "NASED" is the Federal quasi-agency that was supposed to be minding the shop when all this went down, and at best just slacked completely on oversight of the voting product testing process. Some evidence shows they actively covered up misconduct and incompetence concerning Diebold and one of their primary test labs but that's basically "advanced curriculum" material.
In the "Dieboldsins" document, pay particular attention to the section that has the picture of part of the TS motherboard in it.
I don't know if Cynthia McKinney won or lost. I don't care about that per se. What bothers me is that *nobody* knows for sure, except anybody who may have tampered either in Diebold or more likely a county elections office. I care about the election process working, because if it visibly doesn't we eventually end up with a very bad situation indeed.
I have no use for McKinney either. She's a nut.
However.
Georgia is one of two states that have standardized on the Diebold "TS" voting machines. The "TS" is the older touchscreen that Diebold never created an individual-voter paper trail option for. So the votes are recorded electronically and that's it. Maryland is the other. There's a few TSes scattered around but they're mainly in those states.
The TS is the second worst voting machine in America, period, end of discussion. The worst? The Diebold GEMS central tabulator that counts the votes at county HQ from the TS or other Diebold machines in the field.
The third worst is the Diebold absentee ballot scanner.
I've just finished a massive project documenting the worst ills of these things. One set of problems related to Windows CE is such an incredible situation, it's possible to describe the Diebold touchscreen product line (TS and newer "TSx") as literally not legally meeting the definition of "voting machine" in 37 states, GA and MD included.
Here's the broadcast I just did on the subject minutes after finishing:
------------
There are now five files in the "Diebold fraud series" comprising the latest and most complete accounting of Diebold's sins to date:
http://www.equalccw.com/wincefraudwalkthrough.pdf – an overview of Diebold's Windows CE-related fraud. NEW TODAY: Appendix A constitutes a new page with additional evidence that this was deliberate on Diebold's part. Before we found that (again, appendix A) an argument could be made that Diebold might have declared the customized Windows CE code and Wyle ignored it. This is a specific statement that Diebold withheld the CE customizations from the test labs. Along with the Lee declaration, this in my opinion is the front-runner to putting Diebold flat out of the elections industry. Five pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/19202v2006.pdf - it's an ultra-condensed version of the file above, submitted to the California Secretary of State's site as an official request under California Election Code 19202. One page. Needs the Lee declaration in support.
http://www.equalccw.com/rrlee-wincedeclaration.pdf – the declaration of Dr. Richard Lee. Same as previously distributed, no changes. Three pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/thenasedblues.pdf – covers the possibility of NASED involvement in covering up the madness documented here and in items 1 and 2 of this list. ALL new. It's not "airtight" but like the rest it's "probable cause" for somebody with subpoena powers to sort out the truth: a gutsy district attorney could do it, a state AG would be better, or a very gutsy Federal prosecutor. The California SecState's office might be able to do it too, so go Bowen! Four pages.
http://www.equalccw.com/dieboldsinsandsecrecy.pdf - a more general listing (with links to evidence) of Diebold misconduct and cover-ups. 12 pages, but some big graphics. Over 9meg file size.
Folks, I'm pissed. More than that, I'm personally offended that Diebold is still in the vote biz. It's time for that to end.
And beyond that, it's time to point fingers at the oversight process that allowed them to run rampant. Because that certification and oversight process at the Federal level is the lynchpin behind ALL these vendors.
Everything here can be forwarded at will. The "WinCEfraudwalkthough" and "Lee declarations" must be a "matched set" of course...best if all five are mentioned as a set.
------------
As you can see, the page counts aren't all that bad.
I can't make you read it all, or even bits. If you're going to skip anything, skip the "19202" document and the "NASED" doc. "NASED" is the Federal quasi-agency that was supposed to be minding the shop when all this went down, and at best just slacked completely on oversight of the voting product testing process. Some evidence shows they actively covered up misconduct and incompetence concerning Diebold and one of their primary test labs but that's basically "advanced curriculum" material.
In the "Dieboldsins" document, pay particular attention to the section that has the picture of part of the TS motherboard in it.
I don't know if Cynthia McKinney won or lost. I don't care about that per se. What bothers me is that *nobody* knows for sure, except anybody who may have tampered either in Diebold or more likely a county elections office. I care about the election process working, because if it visibly doesn't we eventually end up with a very bad situation indeed.