Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

CZ 75B vs. FN FNP-9

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by TX expat, Jan 17, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. TX expat

    TX expat Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    152
    I realize these two are sort of like an apple and an orange, but I'm asking for thoughts and opinions anyway!

    I'm looking for a somewhat inexpensive paper puncher and I think I've narrowed it down to these two, so I thought I'd see what opinions I got from the knowledgeable folks on THR. I've had the opportunity to get my hands around both and I'm not put off by the way either one feels. They both have fairly similar new and used pricing, so I can't really use that as a deciding factor. I'm mostly looking for nothing more than a fun, reliable gun to play with at the range, but I've thought more than once about maybe getting into some of the competitive handgun sports, so this would probably also be the pistol that I used for that, if I ever get around to doing it...

    My only real criteria (other than a limited dollar amount) when I started doing some research was that I really wanted to get something SA/DA instead of one of the striker fired type pistols. I already have an XD and so I thought something different would be fun in a lower recoiling caliber. That's where I started, and these two guns are where I have ended up, so if you have any opinions or experience with either one, or even better, if you have experience with both of 'em, please give me your thoughts, ideas, suggestions, etc.
     
  2. sniper4usmc

    sniper4usmc Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    23
    I have both,,and CZ is more accurate then FNP
     
  3. metalman8600

    metalman8600 member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2010
    Messages:
    276
    I would go with the CZ-75b. It would have lesser recoil due to the weight, and it's a classic!
     
  4. Dunedain

    Dunedain Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2009
    Messages:
    44
    CZ 75 all the way. :)
     
  5. JohnGalt88

    JohnGalt88 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2010
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    Macon, Ga
    The CZ.

    For paper punching i would go with a CZ75 SA, they have an excellent trigger pull and are only 40-70 dollars more.
     
  6. rellascout

    rellascout member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2004
    Messages:
    5,149
    Location:
    VA
    Which one fits your hand better. I love the 75B but the length of pull is too long for me. The FN9 works. Its a poor man's Sig. IMHO

    They were a steal under $400. Then again I paid $350 for my 75B back when I had one. :)

    The problem with the 75B and all CZ is the trigger stacking. Without a custom trigger job by someone like Angus you will notice it. It is not a deal breaker but it is there. On the other side I feel the FNP9 is a little spongy.
     
  7. Lvl21nerd

    Lvl21nerd Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    i am biased, but i would go with the CZ anyways (again) because the thing i dont like about the FNP is the "cheap" look/feel of the decocker...and i guess the barrel could stand to be a bit thicker...its a good gun but i like a CZ quite a bit more
     
  8. Furncliff

    Furncliff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,216
    Location:
    Western Slope of Colorado
    Trigger is something to deal with on the CZ, but on the other side...oh man they are sweet. I prefer steel. I have the .22 Kadet conversion too, very fast switch and really nice to shoot rimfire with your full size 9mm.
     
  9. potmetal

    potmetal Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2010
    Messages:
    222
    Location:
    Missouri
    I'm gonna say the FN. I love both guns, have owned both, and put alot of rounds through both. The CZ is a classic design and a great shooting gun, but I found the FN to be easier to point, shoot, and keep on target.
    It's all in the way it feels in your hands, but I was very impressed with the FNP9.
     
  10. oasis618

    oasis618 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2009
    Messages:
    491
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    Both nice guns but my vote goes to the CZ without hesitation.
     
  11. speedway

    speedway Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2010
    Messages:
    249
    Location:
    Connecticut
    My FNP-9 is a tack driver. It is a pleasure to shoot. I would not hesitate to pick one up. They are available for short money since the FNX came out.
     
  12. jmr40

    jmr40 Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2007
    Messages:
    10,091
    Location:
    Georgia
    I've tried the CZ and was left unimpressed. I've not owned one of the FN's yet, but would buy one in a minute over the CZ.
     
  13. schmeky

    schmeky Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2006
    Messages:
    2,190
    Location:
    West Monroe, Louisiana
    I had a NIB FNP-45 and it was the best machined, fitted, and finished production pistol I have ever owned in it's price range. The machining was flawless. I never could shoot it as well as I thought it could shoot. This is the shooter, not the pistol.

    Accuracy wise, I can drill most anything with a CZ, the ergonomics and all steel construction suite me. I have handled some FNP-9's, but I prefer a CZ.

    Either way, you can't go wrong.
     
  14. TX expat

    TX expat Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2010
    Messages:
    152
    Well I'll say this, I'm actually glad to see that both have some strong words of support, because I really don't dislike either pistol. I was originally leaning towards the CZ, but the FN selections seem to be more available and a little less expensive, though not much. The FN trigger did feel the smoother of the two on a full pull, but from a cocked position, they were both pretty nice.

    I wonder if I can talk my wife into my need for both???
     
  15. Lvl21nerd

    Lvl21nerd Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Southern Illinois
    i think the CZ has cheaper magazines (Greg Cote, LLC...the anti-friction MecGars)

    AFAIK, the FNP mags are about $10 more each...if that matters to you
     
  16. viking499

    viking499 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2007
    Messages:
    3,426
    Never had an FN, but have had CZ's for years. Handled the FN's but they don't fit my hand like the CZ's do.

    My vote is for the CZ.
     
  17. iibao

    iibao Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    17
    Location:
    Texas
    I have a CZ, and love it. :D

    Hahahaha, good luck!
     
  18. CZ57

    CZ57 member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2005
    Messages:
    1,533
    Location:
    Heart of Texas
    CZ75 for a paper puncher.

    FNP if you think you might ever carry with it and I like the interchangeable backstraps for fitting the gun to your hand.;)
     
  19. wbwanzer

    wbwanzer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,158
    I've never owned or fired the FNP, but I have an FNX-9 that I picked up last week. (See my range report posted on this forum). I would say FNP or FNX. I've had two CZs. I liked them but couldn't shoot well with them. Didn't like the triggers. Sold both.

    My FNX has a really nice SA trigger pull. Much nicer than either of the CZs I owned.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page