Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Didn't know Lasers were this far along....

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by berettaprofessor, Apr 9, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. berettaprofessor

    berettaprofessor Member

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,850
    Location:
    Kansas
    This news story about the Navy deploying a laser weapon stunned me this morning; http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2013/04/08/navy-to-deploy-laser-to-destroy-drones-small-boats/?hpt=hp_t5

    I had no idea lasers like this were any more than a dream right now; I understand infrared lasers on battlefields making life uncomfortable for an antagonist, etc, but laser power able to actually destroy a small boat? Drones? Do they really exist or is this some journalists misconception of what it actually does?

    And if it's real, where do I get one? (man-portable, of course!)
     
  2. Romeo 33 Delta

    Romeo 33 Delta Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    402
    I think Federal regulation of "firearms" is about to get a bit more complicated. (tongue firmly planted in cheek)

    I read/heard that the cost per shot is about $1.00 (Ammo's really cheap ... however the firing platform is REALLY EXPENSIVE)!
     
  3. brigadier

    brigadier Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    404
    A friend of mine who's a Romanian army vet told me they had stuff like this when Ceausescu was in power.

    My understanding is that the us military's hesitance to use lasers as weapons has in the past been mainly because of their uncontrolability and ease of being turned on the user.

    TBH, I am still skeptical of this new system for those reasons.
     
  4. alsaqr

    alsaqr Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,351
    Location:
    South Western, OK
  5. mgmorden

    mgmorden Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2009
    Messages:
    4,570
    Location:
    Charleston, South Carolina
    Um, a laser is FAR more controllable than conventional arms. There's no recoil forces, and its a stream beam that follows a very specific path. Its not quite the same as sci-fi where the Stormtroopers can't hit anything - the laser is at an invisible wavelength and is just a brief pulse rather than some laser bolt you see shooting out of a gun, but they're incredibly precise and they're no more susceptible to be "turned on the user" than any other weapon.

    The main thing that has held up deployment of lasers for so long are power requirements. It takes a LOT of energy to fire a laser powerful enough to do damage to structures and personnel in an instant. Putting them in a fixed location works well for defensive uses but no offense due to the fact that all shots must be line of sight. We're finally getting to the point though where our power generation/storage capabilities can put this on some (large) moving platforms like a large airliner-sized plan, or a ship.

    I wouldn't hold my breath on a handheld sized one anytime soon, but this type of large laser has become viable for military use.
     
  6. blakeci

    blakeci Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Messages:
    155
    Location:
    Clayton, NC USA
    Is there something wrong with me if the first thing I thought of when I read this thread was Dr. Evil making air quotes and saying "Lazer":evil:
     
  7. brigadier

    brigadier Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    404
    Allot of people seam to be mimicking Dr. Evil nowadays.
     
  8. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,091
    There is many big issues with laser weapons. Reflection off objects is a big one. A small percentage of a beam strong enough to damage objects will have the power to blind friend and foe alike with unshielded eyes.
    Consider that even lasers not strong enough to do more than slowly burn something can permanently damage the eyesight of those nearby if they even reflect under 1% of the beam off a water droplet or reflective surface for a split second.
    Now ramp that up to a big powerful laser strong enough to actually destroy objects.
    .0001% of this beam can probably blind you for life if it reflects off a wave for a fraction of a second.



    The blinding capabilities of such weapons are what I think they are ultimately aiming towards anyways. If they are technically aiming at a boat to destroy it and blind everyone on board as a side effect, they are not really using an illegal blinding weapon right?
    Oops did we blind everyone on board for life prior to boarding or destroying with minimal resistance with conventional arms?


    In the future warfare may involve common use of such things that permanently blinds everyone around who is not wearing something over thier eyes.
    Which has ramifications for rebels and civilians facing government forces as well.
    The dictator of the future may fly over and blind half the town that is resisting them.
     
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2013
  9. JustinJ

    JustinJ Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2011
    Messages:
    4,046
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    "He said the "solid-state laser is a big step forward to revolutionizing modern warfare with directed energy, just as gunpowder did in the era of knives and swords.""

    I wonder if this means the whole laser is solid state? If so that is amazing. To generate sufficient energy to destroy a boat it has generally required very large chemical lasers such as the one being developed to shoot down missiles from a converted 747. One problem with lasers though is that they probably won't be terribly hard to defeat by using an outer layer of reflective or other types of materials.

    The link below is about the converted 747 anti-missile platform:
    http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2010/10/22/boeings-airborne-laser-fails-second-shootdown-test/
     
  10. FourTeeFive

    FourTeeFive Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    Messages:
    1,077
    Location:
    PNW WA
  11. 85win

    85win Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    Messages:
    32
    Location:
    South Central KS
    A few years back, the US Air Force fit one of these on a 747. The work was done in Wichita, Kansas for a year or two. The laser was meant to be flown to conflicts and was suppose to be able to shoot missiles, etc down while in flight. I cannot remember if the project got completed.
     
  12. hso

    hso Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2003
    Messages:
    47,960
    Location:
    0 hrs east of TN
    Ships mounted weapons are just a tab beyond our scope (especially directed energy weapons).
     
  13. Sam Cade

    Sam Cade Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2005
    Messages:
    5,228
    Location:
    Rural Kentucky, surrounded by Amish

    That would be Article 1 vs Article 3 wouldn't it?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protocol_on_Blinding_Laser_Weapons
     
  14. Al Thompson

    Al Thompson Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    8,847
    Location:
    South Carolina
    Ditto to what hso said. :)
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page