Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Differences between sig an glock?

Discussion in 'Handguns: Autoloaders' started by Mossy Bloke, Apr 4, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Mossy Bloke

    Mossy Bloke Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    98
    I'm looking at getting a 357. Can someone tell me the differences between a p229 and say, a midsize glock in 357?

    I know this is probably comparing apples to oranges, but just indulge me. Personal opinions are welcome.
     
  2. Handy

    Handy Guest

    Glock .357/Sig .357:

    Plastic frame/aluminum frame
    Light "Safe action trigger"/DA/SA trigger
    Striker/hammer
    Built in grips/replaceable grips
    1 frame lever/2 frame levers
    Really tough finish/decent finish
    Really expensive mags/almost as expensive mags
    Slim/not so slim
    A basic 9mm pistol with .357 barrel as an afterthought/a gun built around .40/.357 ammo family.

    Personal opinion: .357 Sig is an expensive and difficult to load specialty cartridge. Consider a 9mm for price and capacity or a .45 for oomph.

    Of the two pistol types, they both do well, but I feel the DA/SA trigger of the Sig offers safer carry and more options.
     
  3. Dave T

    Dave T Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Messages:
    831
    Location:
    Mesa, AZ
    SIG has two distinct trigger pulls and sets rather high in the hand (increased felt recoil). It is also expensive.
    Glock has one spongy trigger pull and sets lower in the hand (less felt recoil). Some say the polymer (plastic) frame flexes and soaks up some recoil. Glock is cheeper than the SIG by a couple hundred bucks.
    I prefer and recommend to my students a consistant trigger pull so I would go with the Glock of these two (I carry 1911s) but this is so subjective it boils down to individual preference.
     
  4. CWL

    CWL Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    6,505
    Personal opinions?

    Sigs are like a well-tuned German sportscar.

    Glocks are like a well-tuned pickup truck.

    They both get you to your destination. You probably won't care about dinging-up the pickup.
     
  5. treeprof

    treeprof Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    773
    Location:
    Ohio
    Those guys have covered it well. I have both SIGs and glock in 357 SIG, and enjoy shooting both makes. Both the ergonomics and operation are different, as explained above. Grip-bore angle is quite different as well, and you may prefer one over the other as it relates to your natural point of aim. SIG's have the edge in overall feel and accuracy IMO, but I more often have the Glock with me - the pick-up truck analogy at work.
     
  6. 10-Ring

    10-Ring Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    12,037
    Location:
    California
    In this case, I'd go w/ the SIG.
     
  7. arizona

    arizona Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2003
    Messages:
    106
    Sig

    I have had both in 9mm and recommend the Sig. IMHO the Sig feels better in the hand, not as thick. Also, is safer and more accurate.

    The Glock has a tougher finish.
     
  8. HadEmAll

    HadEmAll Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2003
    Messages:
    250
    Location:
    San Antonio, Texas
    Everything's been pretty well covered except one thing. The SIG is almost guaranteed to be somewhat more accurate than the Glock when fired single-action, but I'll go out on a limb and state that for 99% of shooters, the Glock will be more accurate (hit closer to where you actually intend to hit) than the SIG for the first shot out of each pistol, IF the SIG is fired double-action. That first shot is important to me, so I'd go for the Glock if you're going to carry it for SD. Basically, in my opinion, the SIG is the better range gun, the Glock the better carry gun. Both are great.
     
  9. C. H. Luke

    C. H. Luke Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2003
    Messages:
    524
    Location:
    NE
    Not a .357S fan as reload. Have had a G32 and have a SIG P229
    {with both .40 & .357S bbl's.}. 229 shoots with typical SIG "Softness", the Glock did not.......

    Other than that the SIG reeks of pure Class!
     
  10. cratz2

    cratz2 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    4,233
    Location:
    Central IN
    I'm not a fan of the round and not a big fan of either Glocks or SIGs but between the two, I'd probably go for the Glock. The SIGs don't seem to have more recoil per se, but tend to be flippier in the hand, esp when comapring the smaller guns.

    It's a shame more companies don't offer the 38 Super and 9x23 in more factory guns. 9x23 offers 357 SIG performance in a smaller diameter case allowing more rounds in a given magazine length and a infinitely stronger case and easier to load/reload package as well.
     
  11. firestar

    firestar member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    1,761
    If you get the SIG, you can buy SIG .40 cal replacment bbls really cheap right now and be able to shoot either cal. I would not buy a .357 sig because I don't like to pay $1 per shot but that is just me. I would also suggest a 9mm, there are some pretty hot loads for the 9mm out there that will give you some real speed and energy.

    The SIG and the Glock are strong guns that you will probably never wear out but the SIG will be much more accurate and there is more pride of ownership in owning the best production pistol on the market. The Glock is fine if you want a plastic framed Ruger with no hammer for three time the price.:rolleyes:
     
  12. TechBrute

    TechBrute Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    3,264
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    Oooh, oooh... Get the Sig!! It costs 50% more so you can brag to your friends about how much you spent. Oh yeah, while you're in the mood to spend money, buy lots of ammo to practice with, because the DA/SA trigger pull on the Sig takes WAAAAY more training to learn to shoot well under stress. Also, with the extra $200, you get all the neat, but useless, buttons, levers, switches and other such gizmos on the Sig.

    Recap: No one can knock the quality of a SIG, but the DA/SA trigger pull was deveoped due to lawyers and insurance companies. It is NEVER preferred to a consistent trigger pull among shooters.

    Oh yeah, just get a .40S&W, regardless of the gun.:D
     
  13. Don Gwinn

    Don Gwinn Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Messages:
    6,385
    Location:
    Virden, IL
    Never say never. . . . some people like DA. I don't really prefer it, but I've learned to shoot a P220 pretty well and don't consider it a major problem. I shoot my 220 better than my G30, but then the 30 has that shorter grip.

    People will tell you that you need a lot of training to "overcome the obstacle" of DA. I would say that the corollary is that you need a lot of training to be so good that DA is a major hindrance to your shooting ability.
     
  14. Quintin Likely

    Quintin Likely Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    898
    Location:
    Relay 3, Target 17
    firestar said...

    Now, there's no need to be rude...

    I've got both, a Glock and a Sig although neither of mine are in 357 SIG...my P239 could be, if I bought the 357 barrel and magazines though. The Sig feels like its put together more solidly than my Glock is, but they're both fine shooters regardless of caliber.

    My advice? Get your hands on Glock 31/32/33 and a Sig, shoot both, buy whatever suits you best. It is, afterall, gonna be *your* cannon.
     
  15. T.Stahl

    T.Stahl Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    739
    Location:
    near Hamburg/Germany
    Several, independent sources told me that Sigs can rust.
    vs.
    I've never heard that Glocks rust.
     
  16. faustulus

    faustulus Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,185
    Location:
    Middle Tennessee
    Both are excellent guns it comes down to which feels better in your hands. Both have their pluses, what it comes down to for me is the grip angle. The glock grip is different from 99 percent of the guns on the market, if you don't have any other pistols I don't think this would be a problem, for me it renders the gun useless. You cannot go wrong with either.
     
  17. Handy

    Handy Guest

    Techbrute,

    DA triggers were developed for handguns in the 19th century. They have proved to be the preferred carry method for the majority of shooters for the last 100 years. The largest majority of police and military, East and West, prefer DA triggers above all else for people that actually use firearms.


    So, which "shooters" are you talking about? Those that teach classes, compete in competitions, or write for magazines?

    The lawyers came into the game a little late to influence much of anything.


    Also, saying that a Sig is a bad value compared to a Glock is ludicrous. Sigs have barely changed price in 15 years. Glocks have doubled.
     
  18. Mr. Purple

    Mr. Purple member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    32
    SIGs rust, the 220, 226 and 228 with the stamped slides (45 and 9mm).

    SIGs in 40 (226, and all caliber 229, and 239s) have stainless slides and are less likely to rust.

    Glocks all have tenifer finish and don't rust.

    Having handled copies of both brands, I find both to be outstanding and purchase a matter of personal preference.
     
  19. dan_s

    dan_s Member

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2003
    Messages:
    53
    Location:
    Sterling, Va.
    Forget the comments you may read about the 357 Sig being difficult to load. It is not...
     
  20. Waste of Money

    Waste of Money Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2003
    Messages:
    51
    Location:
    Ulster Cty, NY
    If you're concerned about the price of 357SIG ammo, worry no more. The cost has been dropping for the past year or two and now equals 40S&W costs for practice fodder ammo.

    Check outGeorgia Arms and look for "Canned Heat". They're excellent quality reloads and priced lower than anyone. I tried many calibers and have had no failures.

    Some folks carry the Sheer Power Plus which are new brass stuffed with Gold Dot bullets and plenty hot.
     
  21. blades67

    blades67 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,771
    Location:
    Mesa, Arizona, USA
    Differences between SIG and Glock?

    The way they feel in your hand, what they're made from, how much they cost and how they light the fire. Other than that, there's not much difference.:D
     
  22. Quintin Likely

    Quintin Likely Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    898
    Location:
    Relay 3, Target 17
    Admitedly, I haven't owned my Sig very long, but I've gotta ask:

    Under what conditions exactly does a Sig rust?

    Lack of maintenance? Leaving it in the bathtub? Does your gun cabinet get rained in to or something? Do gremlins break in your house and ride Sigs around in the toilet like a canoe? Do you hang it up in the closet in a leather holster after toting it around on a hot and humid day?

    And if you really wanted to be picky, the slide release on a Glock could rust. ;)
     
  23. vanfunk

    vanfunk Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2003
    Messages:
    665
    Location:
    The widening gyre
    Inconsistent trigger pull on a SIG? Hmm, My SIG's have a consistent 10 lb. double action for the first pull, then a consistent 4 lb. single action for each successive squeeze.

    I have both SIG's and Glocks, don't have much of a problem figuring out what's in my hand when I'm firing it, or hitting what I'm shooting at (assuming it's under 25 yards away :evil: )

    They're both great gun designs:cool:

    vanfunk
     
    Last edited: Apr 7, 2003
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page