Boy, your story sounds a lot like mine. The now X-wife told her lawyer she was ‘uncomfortable’ with my firearms in the house, so she had the Sheriff’s department remove them. At the first hearing, after I’d moved out, the judge ordered they be returned to me because ‘uncomfortable’ wasn’t a valid reason to take my firearms. Her lawyer tried very hard to argue that I could become violent and wanted the judge to keep them, permanently. That didn’t fly though, and she (yes, a female judge) denied their petition. This is in the very liberal state of Washington too.
The deputy was impressed at how secure I kept them; locked in a hard case with two padlocks- and trigger locks on each. They also apologized for cutting both padlocks off the case. They took good care of them for the month or so that they had them too, no bangs or scratches or other signs that they messed with them.
The problem came later when I went to buy a new handgun. At that point, we still had mutual no-contact restraining orders. If you check YES to the restraining order question on the form, the gun shop cannot sell you the gun. If you turn the form over and read the explanation for that question, you will find that there has to be a finding by a judge of domestic violence or some wording to that effect. If anyone has the form handy, please let us know how that reads exactly. But anyway, if you read the explanation of the question, you can honestly answer NO and buy your firearm.