Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do they not make them like they used to?

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Nightcrawler, Feb 18, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,950
    Location:
    Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
    To hear a lot of more seasoned gun owners talk, the quality of American and foreign firearms in general used to be much higher. Sure, today we have better materials and engineering. But many say that better quality control was applied back in the day, and guns left the factory with good triggers, good finishes, good fit, etc.

    "Pre-64" Winchesters command a high price. Why? What happened in 1964?

    So, what's the scoop? I call on the knowledge of THR members that have been around for more winters than I. Did they make them better back in the day? If so, how come quality has dropped? If quality is down, why are prices up? Why do gunowners in general put up with it?
     
  2. bogie

    bogie Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,569
    Location:
    St. Louis, in the Don't Show Me state
    They changed the construction of the bolt. Pre-64 was a controlled feed mechanism.
     
  3. blades67

    blades67 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,771
    Location:
    Mesa, Arizona, USA
    In '64 Winchester changed from a claw-feed bolt to a push-feed bolt. Nothing wrong with it, just some folks hate change because it require them to think and most people don't like to do that.:rolleyes:

    My Kimber Custom II has better fit and a better trigger than my Colt MK IV Series 80 ever did and it cost less overall because the Colt required work. Talking about "the good old days" is just their way of saying "help, I'm getting old and I can't get up!":evil:
     
  4. Nightcrawler

    Nightcrawler Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,950
    Location:
    Utah, inside the Terraformed Zone
    What about revolvers? A lot of Smith & Wesson collectors say that their quality has dropped in the last 10-15 or so years.
     
  5. MountainPeak

    MountainPeak Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    784
    S&W's high luster blueing use to be a thing of beauty that was affordable for many more people. As the more labor intensive costs rose so did manufacturing costs. As litigation costs have risen, some manufacturers attempted to hold the line in pricing by reducing their costs. In my opinion, the result was a lesser quality firearm. Just 2 examples, of one mans opinion. Mine.
     
  6. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    The options in firearms are far, far, far greater than ever; the options in very high qualty firearms, however, keep diminishing.

    Once upon a time, I looked down my nose at used guns, but they're about all I buy any more.
     
  7. Marshall

    Marshall Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    5,569
    Location:
    Oklahoma, Green Country
    I'll take today's firearms any day, we are making history right now!
     
  8. Redlg155

    Redlg155 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    2,724
    Location:
    NW Florida
    If I'm not mistaken you can still get a new manufactured controlled feed model 70. If I remember correctly, they were rather pricey.

    The problem today is that weapons are put together by assemblers and not craftsmen. A craftsman has a critical eye towards the fit and quality. An assembler only cares that the parts go together so they can get to the next one in line.

    Good SHooting
    RED
     
  9. Bergeron

    Bergeron Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    435
    Location:
    Lafayette, LA
    Well, I remeber shooting a friend's pre-A1 1911 along with my USP. Compared to the 1911, my USP was much more comfortable, reliable, and accurate.

    I think that in general, today's firearms are of higher quality than what we had previously.
     
  10. cheygriz

    cheygriz Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,245
    Location:
    High up in the Rockies
    They don't make them like they used to!

    Thank God!

    The old timers considered aesthetics above all else. If a gun had "really nice wood" and "good, high lustre bluing" and close fit and finish, it was considered a high quality gun. It didn't matter if it didn't shoot worth a damn, and the rifling washed out in 1500 rounds, as long as it was pretty, they liked it. Even today, you can still find guns with wood stocks and bluing.

    Personally, I prefer to spend money on reliability, durability, phosphate or polymer finish, ergonomics and accuracy. Give me a synthetic stock, a chrome lined chamber and bore, and a fast, easy handling, rugged, durable rifle. I like pretty in women, not in guns.

    I'll take modern guns over the older guns any day.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page