Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Do you have group differences between bench and field positions?

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by prelaw09, Feb 25, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. prelaw09

    prelaw09 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    PRNJ
    Hi all,

    Another dumb noob question here, but do your groups open up when you go from a shooting bench to field positions (standing, sitting, or prone)? If so, how much?

    I ask because I got some trigger time with an AR the other day and after shooting from a bench on sandbags I was pretty impressed with my self. Then I wanted to see how I did in field positions. Boy, the bubble burst real quick.

    Prone my groups opened up from about 2 inches to about 3.5.
    sitting to almost 6
    standing I was barely still even on target.

    I was shooting a DPMS 20" A2. The ammo was the same for all shots. I did not have a Bipod. Range was 100 yards.

    Any thoughts?

    Thanks
     
  2. TMM

    TMM Member

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    1,049
    basically, the less support you have for the rifle, the more potential you have for bad groupings. i don't have much experience, but i've found breathing is important. as you breathe, you move. before the shot, i take a couple big breaths to oxygenate my system, then i hold a half breath, and then there's about 4 or 5 seconds when i'm steady enough to aim and fire well.

    also try using a sling...i found wrapping a sling around my left arm makes it a bit easier to steady the rifle. don't know if it's a "kosher" method, but it makes the crosshairs wobble less...

    tmm
     
  3. jbkebert

    jbkebert Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2009
    Messages:
    2,599
    Location:
    Kansas
    Sure your groups are bound to open up with less and less support. Shooting from the bench is great for sighting in and general practice. Not really a option in hunting applications. The lower you get to the ground the better you groups will be. Don't shoot standing if you can shoot sitting, Don't shoot sitting if you can go prone. I am no where close to being the best rifleman on this Forum but I am no slouch behind the trigger either. If you are wanting to shrink groups shooting offhand at 100 yards. Get a sling and learn how to use it to help steady the rifle. I once shot a DPMS in .308 and absolutly hated that rifle. It seemed to be heavier than Savage 12bvss and it is a heavy varmit rifle. Yes you can hold a heavier gun easier to keep on target to a certain point. Then weight at least in my experience hurts you performance.
     
  4. prelaw09

    prelaw09 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    PRNJ
    Thanks Guys

    Now I don't feel so bad. I was using a sling, but I could have not been using right. Also, what is the expected difference between the positions? Have any of you noticed a "normal" increase in group size?

    thanks
     
  5. mainmech48

    mainmech48 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,846
    Location:
    Indiana
    You betcha, Kimosabe. IME, the vast majority of the folks who claim otherwise for themselves speaketh through their sombreros.

    With dedicated and diligent practice your groups will improve dramatically. Get a copy of the Army or USMC Basic Marksmanship training manual for starters. Good info and inexpensive.
     
  6. prelaw09

    prelaw09 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    PRNJ
    Thanks Main. I'll pick up the USMC manual. But What I was asking was what do you guys think is a normal increase that you have noticed in your shooting? For instance, a 1 inch inch bench group becomes 2 inch prone to 3 inch sitting, etc. What have you gunnies experienced personally?
     
  7. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    42,990
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    Most of my pets are sub-MOA from the benchrest. In the field with a hasty rest, I can usually stay within maybe two MOA. Offhand? Varies from "not bad" to "minute of pie plate".

    I'm mostly a hunter. I sorta swing in and shoot on a deer, from the offhand position. And, I've done just fine on running deer. I just don't do worth a hoot when trying to shoot groups on paper from offhand. But, I don't eat paper...
     
  8. eye5600

    eye5600 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Messages:
    644
    If I've done my math right, the center of mass of a metallic silhouette target is 3 or 4 MOA, and (as best I know) no one gets them all. From a bench, it would be a piece of cake for lots of guys. Off hand, not so much.
     
  9. Eb1

    Eb1 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    Messages:
    3,010
    Location:
    USA
    When shooting standing you should not use your sling with your AR if you are training for HighPower Competition.
     
  10. trstafford

    trstafford Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2006
    Messages:
    295
    Location:
    (Olathe) Kansas City, KS
    directly proportional

    The difference in group sizes is directly proportional on the amount of time that you practice shooting from proper field positions.
     
  11. ny32182

    ny32182 Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2003
    Messages:
    5,701
    Location:
    Clemson, SC
    When you are shooting off a bench, the bench is doing the vast majority of gun support; when you are standing/sitting/whatever with no bipod, you are doing the support... and the bench is sitting more still than you are. The results are fairly easy to predict...
     
  12. mainmech48

    mainmech48 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Messages:
    1,846
    Location:
    Indiana
    pre, I don't think that this is something that can be so handily quantified.

    What's "normal" for me and what's "normal" for somebody like Lanny Bassham is always going to be wildly different any way you cut it.

    If I were to use his "normal" as a standard for deciding what mine should be it's highly unlikely that I'd ever be able to achieve a "normal" level of performance.

    Col. Cooper once said words to the effect of "Marksmanship isn't what you can do once, it's what you can do on demand." Personally, that makes for some pretty significant differences between what I can do on my 'good' days and a 'bad' one. I don't believe that I'm alone in this.

    When it comes to declaring what I could personally deliver on any given day, I really couldn't tell you for sure. Too many variables.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page