Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Don't interrupt a Sheriff deputy's beer!

Discussion in 'Legal' started by jsalcedo, Feb 8, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. jsalcedo

    jsalcedo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    3,683
    Free-Fire Zone

    Interrupt a sheriff's deputy's beer? Prepare for a hailstorm of lead!

    When Harris County sheriff's deputies return fire, they really return
    fire. Especially if they're at a bar.

    The December 27 drive-by shooting at the venerable West Alabama Ice
    House didn't get much notice from the media, it being just another bit
    of the gunplay that tends to liven up a night on the town here.

    But gee, it sounds like it was fun.

    Three off-duty deputies were at the icehouse about midnight, and things
    seemed quiet enough. Then a 1992 Ford pickup truck screamed down the
    street, with two twentysomethings in it, one of whom started firing a
    .22-caliber pistol.

    The cops tried to get the license plate but couldn't, so they settled
    back to their table. Soon they heard the telltale sounds indicating the
    truck was about to make a second pass. "By that time the guys had
    loaded up and said, 'If he comes back again, forget about it, we're
    returning fire,' " says Burt Springer, the lawyer representing two of
    the deputies.

    And did they ever. Somewhere around 40 shots' worth. Investigators
    reportedly ran out of the little markers used to identify spent shell
    casings and had to borrow paper cups. Basically, Springer says, the
    deputies emptied their guns.

    Not to put too fine a point on it, but.all the shots missed. The truck
    was shot up like Swiss cheese, but neither the driver nor the trigger-
    happy passenger was hit. They were stopped a mile or so later -- not
    because they were driving a truck riddled with bullet holes, but
    because they ran a red light.

    (Deputies do have to keep up their target-shooting qualifications in
    Harris County, but those tests are not taken in bars.)

    Sheriff's spokesman Lieutenant Robert Van Pelt says the department's
    internal affairs division is still looking into the incident, but
    Springer thinks nothing will come of it. Since no one was hit, the
    district attorney's office did not send anyone to the scene, making a
    grand jury review more unlikely.

    Springer says the deputies had been at the bar only a short time and
    weren't drunk. Not that it would matter: "Even police officers who've
    been drinking are allowed to defend themselves," he says.

    If only they could aim.

    http://www.houstonpress.com/issues/2004-02-05/hairballs.html/1/index.html
     
  2. FPrice

    FPrice Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    3,380
    Location:
    People's Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Was there an old movie on the TVthat night in the bar? "The Gang That Couldn't Shoot Straight"?
     
  3. El Tejon

    El Tejon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    18,083
    Location:
    Lafayette, Indiana-the Ned Flanders neighbor to Il
    Hmmm, must be that same Tejas lawman who said something about a ditch and a pile of brass, no?:D
     
  4. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    And of course the rest of us aren't ....... :rolleyes: :(
     
  5. idd

    idd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2004
    Messages:
    281
    Location:
    Texas

    Au contraire, this is Texas. Self-defense is still respected.
     
  6. 4v50 Gary

    4v50 Gary Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2002
    Messages:
    18,528
    Self defense is a God given right and even felons are entitled to defend themselves against unlawful deadly force or against great bodily injury. The real question is how much to shoot back considering that handguns are relatively ineffective against moving vehicles and the possibility of collateral damage.
     
  7. Azrael256

    Azrael256 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,135
    Location:
    Dallas
    Good shoot, IMHO. Raise your hand if you would've done differently.
    Only problem I see is that it was only the deputies returning fire. Should've been the whole neighborhood.
     
  8. WonderNine

    WonderNine member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Messages:
    4,331
    Location:
    always offline!
    Unfortunately I think this is indicative of police marksmanship in general....
     
  9. JPM70535

    JPM70535 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    667
    Location:
    Sunny Florids
    My thoughts exactly, those Deputies desperately need a refresher at their Academy.
     
  10. Thumper

    Thumper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,904
    Location:
    Rosenberg, Texas
    No kidding, I mean, they couldn't even hit a passenger of a moving vehicle while under fire. Geez... Det. Murtaugh always gets 'em right between the eyes with his little .38...

    :D
     
  11. LawDog

    LawDog Moderator Emeritus cum Laude

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Messages:
    2,101
    *snort*

    Anyone here wonder what the driver did when the first round went through the glass?

    Other than that.

    I imagine that parking there while they shot at him wasn't on the list.

    Hitting an accelerating car, at midnight, isn't as easy as one might think at first blush.

    LawDog
     
  12. Ryder

    Ryder Member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Messages:
    2,433
    Location:
    Mid-Michigander
    Questions

    Can't help but wonder why there was no mention of self defense here on the part of these off duty cops. Any windows shot on the bar? Bullet holes in the exterior walls or doors? The story leaves me with the impression that these two guys with the .22 were only raising hell shooting into the air. Death sentence for disturbing the peace?

    These cops just went and sat back down after the first pass. Wouldn't they call that in if there had been real danger?

    News reporting aint all it's cracked up to be!
     
  13. TarpleyG

    TarpleyG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2002
    Messages:
    2,981
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Tallpine beat me to it. As much as you can argue the drink and carry thing you have to admit that statement is very elitist considering normal CHL holders aren't allowed to carry in a bar and aren't allowed to drink and carry. These cops violated both of those "laws".

    GT
     
  14. HankB

    HankB Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Messages:
    5,213
    Location:
    Central Texas
    Very true. It's my observation that police marksmanship, if graphed, would follow an inverted - but lopsided - bell curve. Now, granted, there are a certain number who are pretty doggoned good. But the majority are, to put it bluntly, almost as dangerous to themselves as the bad guys. (I've heard the same from more than one police firearms INSTRUCTOR.) The only time they shoot is at their annual or semiannual qualification.

    I suspect if you took a bunch of randomly selected cops out and had them shoot something like the IDPA classifier, you'd end up with a bunch of "Novice" shooters.
     
  15. TallPine

    TallPine Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    7,734
    Location:
    somewhere in the middle of Montana
    Okay ... try this yourself, then

    I really hope they have internet service in jail so you can tell us how it worked out.
     
  16. cordex

    cordex Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Indiana
    No argument from me, 'Dog.
    'Course, that does beg the question: "If you can't reasonably expect to make reliable hits on a moving vehicle with unknown occupants in a (presumably) populated area, should you be blazing away at it?"


    Azrael256,
    *raises hand*
    I'd be searching for hard cover, not emptying magazines at a moving vehicle.

    But that's me and I'm not a police officer.
     
  17. QuickDraw

    QuickDraw Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    684
    Location:
    The Great State of California (Bay Area)
    Did I miss the part where the yahoos in the truck were shooting AT the bar?
    What would have happened if the cops had put several into the driver,
    him losing control,crashing into an orphanage full of blind,crippled,
    children.Justifiable shooting?
    I thought eveyone in Texas drove around shooting in the air,
    cowboy style! :D (just kidding)

    QuickDraw
     
  18. TheEgg

    TheEgg Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2002
    Messages:
    1,363
    If it is bad public policy for me, a CHL license holder, to be able to carry my handgun into a bar and have a few beers (it is illegal and will get you arrested on a felony charge in Texas), then it is bad public policy for deputies to be able to carry their weapons into a bar for a few beers.

    Oh, wait, I forgot -- some are "more equal" than others.

    :barf:
     
  19. Orthonym

    Orthonym Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Southern Florida
    Was there a telephone in that bar?

    One would think that the off-duty deputies would have enough presence of mind,after repelling the first drive-by and getting back to serious recreation,to get on the phone to dispatcher, 911, or whatever, and get some other folks, on the clock, out there to take care of the situation.

    Wait- No!
    Don't tell me this was one of those counties with such a small population that the entire Sheriff's staff was in the bar!
     
  20. Cosmoline

    Cosmoline Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2002
    Messages:
    23,648
    Location:
    Los Anchorage
    Actually that sounds darned impressive for short guns. I think even gun owners have watched too many sillwood movies. Seeing James Bond drop some BG with his Walther at 200 meters eventually alters your subconscious mind. So you imagine it's an easy matter to nail a bunch of people in a fast-moving motor vehicle with only sidearms.

    If you actually need to hit something, especially something that's moving fast and shooting back at you, you need a long gun.

    The posse that ended the Barrow Gang's reign of terror realized this. They used Remington Autos, Colt Monitors, and assorted hunting rifles. And the end result was shall we say, a little more decisive :D
     
  21. Thumper

    Thumper Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,904
    Location:
    Rosenberg, Texas
    Naw, man...Harris County is Houston. It's hard to tell from the article, but maybe they didn't have a whole lot of time. The article just says "soon."
     
  22. Orthonym

    Orthonym Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    1,354
    Location:
    Southern Florida
    It ain't the marksmanship, exactly.

    It's the attitude,dude! (My opinion subject to correction if/when I get better info). As it happened, the rowdy folks weren't all that dangerous, and were caught. What if they had been seriously dangerous? (I.e., sober, heavily armed Mohammedan fanatics?)
     
  23. labgrade

    labgrade Member In Memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    1,289
    Location:
    west of Loveland, CO
    1) "Reporting" this incident in such an editorial fashion lends no credence to the author.

    2) Nothing mentions the officers were having anything alcoholic - merely they were in a place that served some. Don't know 'bout down south, but perfectly legal here in CO.

    3) I kinda do wonder why there was no reporting of reporting of (yes, I meant to write it that way) the first drive-by. Perhaps the occifers did, but it wasn't reported in the article as such? I dunno. Whole thing really does sound anti-cop biased to me.

    4) " ... but.all the shots missed. The truck was shot up like Swiss cheese, ... "

    Don't know 'bout y'all, but "swiss chees" doesn't sound like "all the shots missed."

    5) From all information, the occifers may have been waiting outside, the truck drove by at 15 feet & every shot was well-directed into where they were supposed to go. Depending upon circumstances, background, etc. it may be that they were every bit circumspect in their application of fire.

    6) Not a darned thing you can tell from such a slip-shod article.

    7) Makes for a great attempt at cop-bashing though, huh? - with zero substantiation.

    Howz that, Art? :D

    labgrade, (peacemonger)
     
  24. cordex

    cordex Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,714
    Location:
    Indiana
    In Texas, I believe the "51% Law" applies ... to Concealed Handgun permittees, anyway. Doubt it applies to police.
    I think the author was trying to say "all the shots missed the perps".
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page